Mohamud Hashi, known among his supporters as the “Joker” of Somaliland politics, embodies a blend of strategic acumen, longevity, and the ability to adapt to an ever-changing political landscape. With a political career spanning over 35 years, Hashi has evolved from a parliamentarian and government minister to the leader of the Kaah Party—a role that cements his legacy as a key player in Somaliland’s political arena.

A Storied Career and Rising Influence

Hashi’s political journey began in 1993 when he joined Somaliland’s Parliament. At the time, he was a prominent member of the opposition and served as a parliamentarian for 12 years. He later took on significant roles, including mayor of Burco and ministerial positions in successive governments, becoming a household name in Somaliland’s political discourse.

Despite his long tenure, Hashi has been described as a “white politician,” a term implying a relatively unblemished reputation in a political culture often marked by factionalism and patronage. Abdinasir Haji, an expert on Somaliland politics, points out that Hashi’s rise and sustained relevance stem from his ability to build alliances and influence key decision-makers.

Hashi himself has acknowledged his role as a “King Maker,” reflecting his knack for shaping political outcomes, even from behind the scenes. His supporters’ chants of “political hero” during his victories within Kaah attest to his enduring popularity and his ability to galvanize a loyal following.

A Vision for Political Change

Hashi has publicly articulated a desire to overhaul Somaliland’s political culture, emphasizing a departure from personality-driven leadership. In his own words, the Kaah Party’s mission is “a vision to change a vision.” This reflects his commitment to institutional reform and a broader, issue-based political dialogue.

However, his critics argue that his strategies—often centering on alliances and coalitions—are primarily tactical maneuvers to secure influence. Hashi’s ability to negotiate political spaces, such as his partnership with the Waddani Party, underscores his pragmatism, but it also raises questions about the ideological consistency of his reformist agenda.

From Kulmiye to Kaah: A Clash of Titans

As a co-founder of the Kulmiye Party, Hashi was instrumental in the party’s ascent to power, including its 2017 election victory under President Muse Bihi. However, his relationship with Bihi soured when the anticipated transition of Kulmiye leadership to Hashi did not materialize. This fallout marked a turning point in his career, prompting his eventual departure from Kulmiye and the establishment of the Kaah Party.

Kaah emerged amidst political turbulence, particularly during disputes over the legality of opening political associations. Hashi seized this opportunity to consolidate his position, rallying support from parliamentarians and former allies across party lines. His ability to navigate these disputes reflects his deep understanding of Somaliland’s political fabric.

Alliance with Waddani: A Strategic Gamble

Hashi’s recent alliance with the Waddani Party, which secured the presidency in Somaliland’s most recent elections, has further elevated his political clout. While the specifics of his influence in the upcoming administration remain uncertain, Abdinasir Haji notes that their coalition agreement likely guarantees Kaah a stake in the new government. This could manifest in ministerial appointments or advisory roles, reinforcing Hashi’s position as a key player in shaping Somaliland’s political future.

Hashi himself, in a pre-election interview, emphasized the significance of this alliance, stating that it would ensure Kaah’s active participation in governance. However, the extent of this influence will largely depend on the dynamics within the coalition and the evolving priorities of the Waddani-led administration.

A Politician of Contradictions

Mohamud Hashi’s career exemplifies the duality of Somaliland’s politics. On one hand, he is celebrated as a reformist and a visionary committed to institutional change. On the other, his reliance on alliances and political maneuvering invites scrutiny over his methods and long-term objectives.

His supporters see him as a “political hero” and a unifying figure who can transcend party lines. Yet, his detractors question whether his strategies truly serve the nation’s democratic aspirations or merely entrench his own influence within the system.

The “Joker” in Somaliland’s Future

As Somaliland moves into a new political chapter under Waddani’s leadership, Mohamud Hashi’s role will be closely watched. Whether he continues as a powerbroker behind the scenes or assumes a formal position within the government, his influence is undeniable.

Hashi’s journey from parliamentarian to mayor, minister, and party leader underscores his adaptability and resilience. His political legacy, marked by both alliances and reforms, reflects the complexities of Somaliland’s democratic experiment. For now, he remains the “Joker” in the nation’s deck—a wildcard capable of reshaping its political fortunes.

As Somaliland gears up for its presidential elections scheduled for November 13, 2024, over one million registered voters will head to the polls to determine their leader for the next five years. With incumbent President Muse Bihi Abdi representing the ruling Peace, Unity, and Development Party (KULMIYE), he faces competition from Abdirahman Mohamed Abdullahi, known as “Irro” of the Waddani party, and Faisal Ali Warabe of the Justice and Development Party (UCID).

Candidates and Their Promises

In interviews, all three candidates have committed to strengthening Somaliland’s democracy, promoting economic development, and pushing for international recognition—something Somaliland has sought for 33 years without success.

President Muse Bihi Abdi, who has served since 2017, has highlighted the potential progress on a maritime deal signed with Ethiopia earlier this year. “Somaliland is ready to implement the MOU [Memorandum of Understanding], and we are awaiting Ethiopia so we can move forward,” he stated. He emphasized that this agreement serves both Somaliland’s need for recognition and Ethiopia’s need for access to the sea.

Irro, who previously served as Speaker of the House of Representatives for over 11 years, indicated his intention to resume talks with Somalia regarding Somaliland’s statehood aspirations. “If elected, I will resume the talks if the Somaliland interest lies there,” he remarked, acknowledging the pressure from the international community to engage in dialogue despite the longstanding goal of gaining recognition.

Faisal Ali Warabe proposed establishing a national unity government to achieve recognition for Somaliland. “If elected, I will lead Somaliland to recognition and a more prosperous road,” Warabe asserted.

Regional Tensions

The upcoming election occurs during a period of heightened tensions between Somalia and Ethiopia, primarily revolving around the recent Memorandum of Understanding. This agreement allows Ethiopia access to a 50-year lease of 20 kilometers of the Red Sea coastline, a deal that Somalia views as a direct threat to its sovereignty.

The signing of this agreement in January 2024 led to significant backlash in Mogadishu, prompting Somalia to expel Ethiopian diplomats and close Ethiopian consulates in the region. Despite the response, Ethiopian officials maintain the deal does not encroach on Somalia’s territorial integrity.

Additionally, previous rounds of talks mediated by Turkey in July and August 2024 have failed to resolve the dispute, with Somalia insisting on Ethiopia’s withdrawal from the agreement and Ethiopia maintaining its position.

Looking Ahead

Somaliland’s last presidential elections in 2017 faced significant delays, attributed to technical and financial constraints, sparking criticism from opposition parties. This electoral process will be crucial for Somaliland’s political future, especially in light of the ongoing regional tensions and its quest for international recognition.

As the elections approach, the Somaliland National Electoral Commission has emphasized its commitment to a transparent and fair electoral process. The outcome will not only affect the political landscape within Somaliland but could also have broader implications for the region’s diplomatic relations and stability. Voters will decide if they wish to continue under Bihi’s leadership or if they will embrace a new direction offered by Irro or Warabe.

Democratic National Committee (DNC) official Lindy Li has called her campaign a “$1 billion disaster.” Li, a member of the DNC National Finance Committee, voiced her frustrations during an appearance on Fox & Friends Weekend on Saturday, describing the failed bid as not only costly but also burdened by unmet promises and strategic missteps.

“The truth is this is just an epic disaster, a $1 billion disaster,” Li said, adding that the campaign is reportedly grappling with between $18 million and $20 million in debt. “I raised millions of that. I have friends I have to be accountable to and explain what happened because I told them it was a margin-of-error race.”

Li specifically took aim at campaign chair Jen O’Malley Dillon, saying Dillon had assured donors and strategists that Harris was positioned for victory. “She even put videos out saying Harris would win,” Li said. “I believed her, my donors believed her, and so they wrote massive checks. I just feel like a lot of us were misled.”

The discontent following Harris’s loss, especially among high-profile DNC members, has exposed a rift within the Democratic Party over its electoral strategy. Some party members argue the campaign failed to resonate with progressive voters, while centrists contend that Harris leaned too far left, alienating moderate swing voters in key states. In the end, Harris lost all seven battleground states, cementing President-elect Trump’s victory and prompting an urgent reassessment within the Democratic camp.

Party Divisions Over Strategy

The aftermath of the election has revealed deeper ideological divides within the Democratic Party. Some factions argue the campaign didn’t push far enough to the left to energize the party’s progressive base, while others believe the Democratic platform veered too far left, potentially alienating moderates and undecided voters in critical swing states.

Li noted that, even on election night, there was a sense of confidence within the campaign that she struggled to understand. “I asked them, ‘Are you privy to internal numbers that I am not seeing?’ because I study this so carefully, and I just wasn’t seeing any basis for that level of confidence.”

Calls for Reflection and Strategic Realignment

The post-mortem on Harris’s campaign has led to calls from within the party to revisit its messaging and voter outreach strategies, particularly after failing to secure the support of crucial voting blocs in competitive states. Some Democrats are now urging the party to conduct a comprehensive analysis of its messaging, assess the public’s priorities more accurately, and strengthen its connection with voters.

As Democrats look toward the next electoral cycle, the party’s approach to addressing these concerns could be key to rebuilding its base and regaining voter confidence in the coming years.

Amnesty International has issued an urgent appeal to the Mozambican government, calling for an end to violent repression of protesters challenging last month’s election results. Demonstrations, fueled by allegations of electoral manipulation, have erupted across the country, with the government’s response turning increasingly forceful. Human rights groups report that at least 20 people have lost their lives in post-election violence, and escalating tensions show little sign of easing.

On Thursday, hundreds of protesters took to the streets of the capital, Maputo, setting tires ablaze and blocking main roads. Police used tear gas to disperse the crowds, and witnesses reported incidents of rubber bullets being fired. Amnesty International’s Cidia Chissungo noted the severe strain in Mozambique as authorities move to quell dissent.

“There are cases of people who have already been shot. We cannot confirm how many died this morning,” Chissungo said. “We are still analyzing all the evidence we’re receiving. Arrests are happening not only in Maputo but also in Nyambane province, and the police have been firing rubber bullets. There is massive tension today, and nobody knows how this will end.”

Allegations of Electoral Irregularities

The protests erupted following the October 9 election, in which Daniel Chapo, the candidate for the ruling Frelimo Party, was declared the winner with over 70% of the vote. Frelimo has governed Mozambique since independence nearly five decades ago. However, opposition parties and civil society groups have criticized the election process, claiming the results were rigged in Frelimo’s favor. The Mozambican government has denied the allegations, insisting the election was fair.

Electoral observers, however, noted multiple irregularities, including limited transparency and reports of voter intimidation. These concerns have galvanized opposition supporters, who are calling for greater accountability. Amnesty International has highlighted the excessive use of force by security forces, which, it says, only serves to deepen the divide.

“Police should respect people’s right to protest,” Chissungo said. “There are cases of people simply standing on the streets, and police decided to arrest them. If citizens are demanding answers and seeking clarification over the election, it is the authorities’ duty to listen. Using violence against protesters only exacerbates the situation.”

Internet Restrictions Add to Mounting Tensions

In addition to the physical crackdown, Mozambican authorities have implemented internet restrictions, hampering citizens’ access to information and stifling communication. Human Rights Watch’s Africa advocacy director, Allan Ngari, criticized the restrictions, emphasizing that access to the internet is integral to exercising freedom of expression, facilitating peaceful assembly, and supporting livelihoods.

“Sometimes the internet is available, sometimes it isn’t—it’s not a full shutdown but rather intermittent restrictions,” Ngari explained. “This violates multiple rights, including the right to freedom of speech and peaceful protest, as well as access to information. The internet is also a source of income for many, and the restrictions impact their ability to earn a living.”

On Thursday, internet access was unexpectedly restored after days of disruptions, although uncertainty remains about future access. For many Mozambicans, restricted connectivity has exacerbated the sense of disenfranchisement and fuelled perceptions that the government is trying to suppress information.

Regional Repercussions

The situation has drawn the attention of neighboring countries, particularly South Africa, which shares a border with Mozambique. Citing security concerns, South Africa temporarily closed its main border crossing with Mozambique on Wednesday and advised its citizens against travel to the country until tensions ease.

As protests continue and calls for governmental accountability grow louder, the response from Mozambique’s leadership will be critical in determining the course of the unrest. Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have both urged Mozambican authorities to lift restrictions on protests and internet access and to approach citizens’ demands with transparency and restraint.

The Mozambican government’s reaction to this unrest could set the tone for how the country navigates growing domestic discontent. With accusations of electoral fraud still hanging in the air, the call for a peaceful and democratic resolution will likely intensify.

Former President Donald Trump captured the presidency again, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris by winning several crucial battleground states and securing an unusual breadth of support across demographics. Despite polling that indicated a close contest, Trump’s campaign strategy proved effective in galvanizing a broad coalition, drawing in constituencies that historically lean Democratic, including young Black men, Latino men, and younger voters.

A Broad-Based Appeal

According to an analysis by The Associated Press, Trump’s coalition included voters from a wide array of backgrounds: union and non-union workers, Black, Hispanic, Asian, Arab, and Muslim Americans. His success with diverse communities underscored his campaign’s ability to appeal beyond his traditional base. “They came from all corners,” Trump declared after his victory, asserting that his support spanned a larger portion of the electorate than in his previous campaigns. The former president is now on the verge of becoming the first Republican presidential candidate in two decades to win the popular vote.

Trump’s legal controversies—34 felony charges related to falsifying business records and a federal jury’s finding that he was liable for sexually abusing and defaming former columnist E. Jean Carroll—did not seem to deter voters. Political scientist Samuel Abrams of Sarah Lawrence College noted that some candidates seem “Teflon-covered,” with negative coverage failing to reduce their appeal. In Trump’s case, his perceived connection with voters’ economic frustrations outweighed public disapproval tied to his legal battles.

The Power of Populist Messaging

Central to Trump’s strategy was a “America First” message aimed directly at voters’ economic struggles. “I understand your struggle,” he would say, resonating with an electorate feeling the sting of inflation, high gas prices, and a generally uncertain economic outlook. Abrams noted that Trump’s rhetoric often distills complex issues into promises of economic relief, a tactic that connects with voters feeling financially squeezed.

Trump’s campaign was agile in its use of social media and alternative platforms to reach younger audiences, particularly targeting young men. His appearance on the widely popular “Joe Rogan Experience” podcast, which drew nearly 47 million views on YouTube, exemplified his strategy of reaching voters outside traditional political media.

Arizona State University’s Thom Reilly highlighted how this approach filled a void left by more conventional campaigns. “They targeted young men. They targeted those that didn’t vote. They targeted individuals who struggled under inflation,” Reilly said, adding that this approach attracted voters who previously felt disconnected from the political process.

Kamala Harris’ Uphill Battle

Harris faced significant challenges, particularly due to her compressed campaign timeline. After President Joe Biden’s unexpected withdrawal from the race in July, Harris had roughly 100 days to establish a distinct platform, a timeframe that hampered her ability to build a robust strategy. Reilly observed that Harris struggled to differentiate herself from Biden, particularly on economic issues, while also failing to consolidate a clear stance on pivotal matters like immigration and economic policy.

Her close association with the Biden administration, which faced scrutiny over its economic record, likely hindered her campaign. “It was clear that the American public wanted change,” Reilly noted. For many voters, Harris represented a continuation of Biden-era policies, especially on economic management, which remained unpopular with significant parts of the electorate.

Another factor that hampered Harris’s campaign was her lack of exposure to primary battles, as Biden withdrew after the primary season had ended. “It was an enormous mistake to have not put her through that test of fire,” Abrams argued. Primaries serve as a proving ground for candidates, helping to reveal weaknesses and test resilience. Harris’s inability to face her competitors head-on in primary contests may have left her ill-prepared for the general election’s intensity.

The Economy Takes Center Stage

Many analysts believe Harris miscalculated by focusing on issues like abortion rights, which resonate with certain voter groups but don’t reach as wide an audience as economic concerns. Republican strategist Jason Cabel Roe argued that abortion, while polarizing, doesn’t directly affect as many voters as issues like inflation and wage stagnation. Roe noted, “All voters have to deal with inflation, gas prices, home energy prices, less take-home pay,” a sentiment echoed by voters in exit polls where economic issues ranked as the top concern.

While some speculated that Harris’s identity as a woman of color may have impacted her campaign, Abrams contended that Trump’s appeal transcended demographic differences, with his economic messaging ultimately resonating more strongly. “I don’t think this really had to do with race and ethnicity or gender at all this time around,” he said. Instead, Trump’s message appeared to cut across identity lines, reaching people who felt left behind or unsupported in the current economy.

Moving Forward

As Trump prepares to take office, his victory raises questions about the durability of traditional political coalitions. By drawing significant support from demographic groups that have historically leaned Democratic, Trump has demonstrated the potential of populist economic messaging to shift voter allegiances. The results suggest a recalibration in American politics, one where issues of financial security and individual well-being can outstrip longstanding partisan loyalties.

Trump’s administration will face the challenge of delivering on his promises in a politically fractured country, with critics ready to scrutinize his next steps. For Harris and the Democratic Party, the defeat signals a need to rethink strategies for addressing the economic and social concerns that cut across the American electorate. The outcome underscores the urgency of responsive governance in an era where voter sentiments are increasingly shaped by economic uncertainty and frustration with established political institutions.

The night Donald Trump secured a second term as president of the United States, a distinct group of voices — often associated with the so-called “heterodoxy” — erupted in celebration. These male podcasters, influencers, and personalities, many with sizable followings among young men, have long marketed themselves as free-thinking, anti-establishment figures, evading traditional political labels. But as Trump’s re-election became a reality in the early hours of Wednesday, they openly embraced the hyper-masculine vision that he championed.

This group — which includes notable figures like Joe Rogan, Elon Musk, Jordan Peterson, and controversial YouTube influencers like Sneako — has built an influential platform on masculinity, defiance of political correctness, and skepticism toward liberal social policies. As Trump’s victory unfolded, they not only endorsed it, but celebrated it with the fervor of newfound ideological certainty. Where once they might have shied away from publicly committing to Trump, they now reveled in his win, proudly aligning themselves with his populist, anti-woke rhetoric.

Joe Rogan’s Endorsement of Trump: A Pivot to the Right

Perhaps one of the most high-profile figures in this shifting landscape is Joe Rogan. Once a Bernie Sanders supporter and later a vocal libertarian, Rogan’s transition to backing Trump is a key example of the “heterodox” turn toward the right. His podcast, The Joe Rogan Experience, boasts an 81% male audience, many of whom echo Rogan’s evolving political leanings. Rogan’s embrace of Trump came after a series of interviews, including one with Elon Musk, who has become a central figure in this new political alignment.

On election night, Rogan’s reaction to Trump’s projected victory was a visceral expression of approval: a brief, unrestrained exclamation of “holy shit” as he watched Trump’s election party. In a post-election video, he attributed his shift toward Trump to Musk, whom he called a key influence in helping him see Trump as the best option for America’s future. This endorsement from Rogan, who once considered himself more centrist or even left-leaning, was a significant signal of the political realignment taking place among his fanbase.

Elon Musk and the Far-Right Embrace

Elon Musk’s shift from a progressive icon to a figurehead for far-right discourse has been well-documented over the past few years. After his 2022 acquisition of Twitter, Musk, who had previously voted for Obama and opposed Trump in 2016, increasingly aligned himself with the conservative wing of the political spectrum. Following Trump’s victory in 2024, Musk posted a cheeky image on X (formerly Twitter) holding a sink in the Oval Office — a reference to his own media takeover — accompanied by the phrase “let that sink in.” This playful yet pointed message not only celebrated Trump’s victory but also underscored Musk’s role in amplifying right-wing narratives.

Musk’s influence has extended to amplifying controversial figures like Alex Jones, Nick Fuentes, and other far-right personalities. His engagement with content dismissing transgender rights and promoting transphobic rhetoric has become a hallmark of his public persona, particularly after his daughter publicly came out as transgender. Musk’s online platform now serves as a megaphone for far-right voices, solidifying his place within this new political ecosystem that celebrates Trump’s return to power.

Young Men and the Hegemonic Masculinity of Trumpism

One of the most striking trends in the 2024 election was the overwhelming support for Trump among young men, particularly those aged 18-29. Exit polls revealed that men in this age group preferred Trump over his opponent, Kamala Harris, by a 56% to 42% margin. This demographic, many of whom have faced economic dissatisfaction and societal pressure, finds resonance in Trump’s traditionalist views on gender roles and masculinity.

A 2021 study identified belief in “hegemonic masculinity” — the idea that men should be dominant, tough, and emotionally stoic — as a key predictor of support for Trump. The heterodox figures who champion these values, such as Jordan Peterson and Sneako, have tapped into the frustrations of young men who feel alienated by contemporary gender norms and progressive social policies. These influencers preach a return to traditional gender roles, where men are expected to be strong, assertive, and, above all, in positions of power. The glorification of hyper-masculinity among these influencers has provided a script for their followers to reject what they view as the softness of modern society.

The Rise of the ‘Bro-Centric’ Political Scene

The rise of Trump’s support within the heterodoxy also marks a larger shift away from traditional political campaigning. Trump’s strategic use of podcasts, social media, and unconventional media outlets allowed him to bypass traditional methods like door-knocking and grassroots canvassing. Instead, his campaign capitalized on the growing influence of figures like Rogan, Musk, and Peterson, whose platforms were instrumental in amplifying his message to young, disaffected men. This unorthodox method of engagement may have played a pivotal role in Trump’s re-election victory, signaling that the future of political campaigning may increasingly depend on the “bro-centric” online spaces that cater to right-wing ideologies.

Emboldened by Victory, the Heterodoxy Moves Right

As Trump’s second term begins to take shape, the heterodoxy stands poised to continue shaping the political discourse. Figures like Sneako, Jordan Peterson, and Dave Portnoy have fully embraced their rightward shift, with many others in the heterodox ecosystem echoing the sentiment that liberal and progressive politics have failed them. With Trump’s victory, they feel emboldened in their rejection of the mainstream political establishment and increasingly aligned with the far-right agenda. Whether through their online platforms, media ventures, or public statements, this new wave of political influencers is not just a passing trend — they represent a growing faction within the broader right-wing movement, one that is only gaining momentum as their support base continues to expand.

In the aftermath of the election, the heterodoxy has emerged as a key player in the ongoing transformation of American politics. With their messages resonating powerfully with young men in particular, this group is likely to remain a fixture in the political landscape for the foreseeable future, shaping public discourse and influencing the direction of conservative politics in America.

As former U.S. President Donald Trump appears poised for a historic return to the White House, world leaders swiftly offered their congratulations, marking a response to Trump’s unexpected comeback. While the VOA has not yet declared an official winner, projections indicate that Trump has overcome his Democratic opponent, Kamala Harris, in a series of critical swing states, rekindling relationships with allies and signaling potential challenges for diplomatic and military alliances worldwide.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, one of Trump’s staunchest allies during his first term, was among the first to extend his congratulations. In a message underscoring the “great alliance between Israel and America,” Netanyahu framed Trump’s apparent win as a “powerful recommitment” to the longstanding U.S.-Israel relationship. Similarly, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy emphasized Trump’s “peace through strength” approach, expressing optimism that a second Trump presidency could expedite a peaceful resolution to Ukraine’s conflict with Russia.

NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte echoed these sentiments, acknowledging that Trump’s leadership will be “key to keeping our Alliance strong.” Trump’s first term was marked by criticism of NATO, as he argued for increased European contributions to defense spending. Yet, in his congratulatory message, Rutte focused on the opportunity for NATO to reinforce its strategic stability, a notion echoed by European leaders aiming to smooth relations with the Trump administration.

French President Emmanuel Macron, who had a complicated relationship with Trump during his initial tenure, congratulated the president-elect and expressed readiness to collaborate on mutual goals, particularly regarding defense, innovation, and climate policy. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, emphasizing the “special relationship” between the U.K. and the U.S., expressed confidence in continued cooperation on issues from security to technological innovation.

Across Europe, congratulations came from both traditional allies and populist leaders. Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Commission, praised the “true partnership” between the U.S. and the EU, a relationship previously tested by Trump’s imposition of tariffs on European imports. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, a long-time Trump supporter, called his win the “biggest comeback in U.S. political history,” underscoring Orban’s alignment with Trump’s conservative policies.

Asia’s leaders followed suit, marking what they hope will be a prosperous chapter for their countries’ relations with Washington. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, calling Trump a friend, expressed eagerness to strengthen U.S.-India collaboration on strategic and economic fronts, building on their close rapport from Trump’s prior term. Meanwhile, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Philippines President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. expressed their confidence in the enduring U.S. partnerships in the Indo-Pacific region. Marcos Jr. framed the U.S.-Philippines alliance as a “force for good,” while Albanese highlighted shared values and security commitments.

Notably absent from the congratulatory messages was Russian President Vladimir Putin, though former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev took to social media to celebrate Harris’s apparent loss, signaling the Kremlin’s ongoing interest in U.S. internal politics.

With Trump on the brink of an official second term, international allies and adversaries alike brace for an era marked by an “America First” approach that is likely to reshape alliances and foreign policy priorities in the coming years.