Why Somalia’s Prime Minister Hamza Abdi Barre Canceled His Visit to Lasanod?

Explore the critical implications behind the Somali Prime Minister’s fear amid rising military tensions and historical echoes.

Just when the complex political narrative in the Horn of Africa appears to be taking a new turn, perturbing developments have emerged regarding Somalia’s Prime Minister, Hamza Abdi Barre. His intended visit to Lasanod was abruptly canceled amid unsettling intelligence reports, citing fear for his security. The implications of this decision lay bare the profound tensions that exist not just within Somalia, but also in the broader context of geopolitical rivalries that could reshape the region’s future.

Sources have confirmed to WARYATV.com that Barre’s cancellation was no mere political maneuver. High-stakes intelligence indicated credible threats against his life, potentially stemming from the rapid advancements in Somaliland’s military capabilities. The integration of cutting-edge technologies like Artificial Intelligence (AI) and advanced drone operations, supported by collaborations with foreign powers, has reshaped the strategic landscape. Such developments have not just concerned Barre; they have sent ripples of apprehension across Mogadishu.

The Somali Prime Minister’s fear is compounded by relative isolation in a world teetering on the brink of chaos. With Somalia’s historical traumas, such as the Isaaq genocide during the Barre regime, still echoing in the hearts of its populace, Barre’s recent rhetoric and support of groups like Hamas have raised eyebrows, drawing ire both locally and internationally. Today, Barre’s declaration that “Israelis and Jews are children of pigs and monkeys” reveals a veiled hypocrisy. While striving for international recognition, his comments risk alienating Somalia from crucial Western allies, jeopardizing aid that is essential for national recovery.

Somaliland, empowered by its new military capabilities, has established itself as a formidable regional player. The reports suggest that the Somali government is aware that Lasanod—an area that has historical ties to past conflicts—may not be a safe haven during Barre’s visit. Intelligence from former Israeli operatives and other sources indicates that there were plans to neutralize Barre in Lasanod, playing into the long-standing history of political assassinations in that city. The poisonous atmosphere of mistrust in Lasanod—a place marked by the tragic assassination of Somalia’s second president—creates a perfect storm of danger for Barre.

What makes this situation more precarious is the burgeoning collaboration between Somaliland and Israel, which promises to enhance intelligence capabilities. This strategic partnership not only empowers Somaliland militarily but also operationalizes the transfer of technology that could heighten the stakes for Somali politicians who would dare to encroach upon Somaliland’s sovereignty.

In the wake of these tensions, it raises important questions regarding the Somaliland government’s reticence about the imminent threats. While they have mobilized resources for defense and intelligence, why is there a lack of communication with their own populace concerning these risks? It could be argued that there exists an anxiety within the Somaliland elite about exposing their citizens to these realities, yet information is the bedrock of effective governance.

Somaliland has moved beyond survival; it is actively working towards recognition and self-determination. As foreign influences shape the geopolitical dynamics of the Horn of Africa, maintaining open channels of communication and fortifying civilian understanding is essential. By failing to do so, the government risks creating a populace ill-prepared for the eventuality of conflict or geopolitical shifts that could affect them directly.

Somalia’s political landscape may be fraught with the opportunism of its leaders, but it is also rife with genuine danger. With Barre’s recent remarks aligned with extremist views and the failure to address key local issues—such as the ongoing violence in Lasanod—the Prime Minister not only gambles with his political capital but also the well-being of the Somali people.

Should Barre’s government continue in its current trajectory, it risks further destabilization as external forces seek to exploit internal divisions. This developing conundrum should serve as a critical reminder to both the government and citizens of Somaliland of the larger conflicts that could soon come knocking at their door.

In conclusion, the cancellation of Hamza Abdi Barre’s visit to Lasanod reflects a broader crisis of governance, self-awareness, and regional stability. As Somaliland positions itself strategically in an era of technological warfare and geopolitical wrangling, the need for clarity, reassurance, and collective action from its leaders has never been more urgent. The stakes are too high for silence or complacency.

Deportees caught in limbo as Somalia scrambles to verify identities and deliver aid from distant embassies.

Somali nationals deported from the U.S. are stranded in Panama without consular support. Somalia confirms it is working to verify their identities and assist with their return.

Somalis Stranded in Panama After U.S. Deportations Highlight Fragile Diplomatic Gaps.

Far from the shores of Mogadishu and beyond the reach of their own government, Somali deportees are now stranded in Panama, victims not just of a ruthless U.S. immigration crackdown but of a diplomatic void Somalia has yet to fill. This is not just a humanitarian issue — it’s a stark indictment of a world system that deports the vulnerable faster than it can protect them.

According to Somali officials, the government is scrambling to confirm the number and identities of its citizens now stuck in Panama after being deported from the United States. These individuals, caught in the crosshairs of President Trump’s hardline immigration machine, were dumped into a Central American holding facility — with no embassy, no aid, and no clear path home.

The Somali Foreign Ministry has directed the deportees to contact its nearest embassy — in Havana, Cuba, over 1,400 kilometers away. That solution, if one can call it that, underscores Somalia’s current diplomatic reach: distant, disjointed, and still recovering from the collapse of a once-functional state. The Somali ambassador in Cuba is reportedly prepared to assist, but how that help reaches those confined in Panama is anyone’s guess.

The scene now unfolding is the product of Trump’s revived deportation policy, one that critics say lacks safeguards for the stateless and the misidentified. This is not just about Somalia — it’s about the weaponization of borders and the disregard for what happens after the deportation plane takes off.

The stranded Somalis are not criminals. They are political footballs in a U.S. domestic war against immigration, repackaged as national security. But once the headlines fade, the human fallout becomes someone else’s problem — in this case, Somalia’s. And Somalia, with a handful of embassies and little leverage, is left struggling to respond.

These deportees are living proof that being forcibly removed doesn’t bring resolution — it births a new kind of exile, one without identity, agency, or address. Somalia’s diplomatic corps, however earnest, isn’t yet built for this scale of complexity. The question is: will anyone step up to fill the gap before these lives disappear completely in the cracks of global bureaucracy?

What now? Washington has moral responsibility. These Somalis will wait in hotel rooms in a foreign land, invisible to the world — casualties of power, paperwork, and politics.

Federal prosecutors add 2021–2024 charges to existing case against Sean “Diddy” Combs, deepening alleged criminal enterprise tied to Combs Enterprises.

Sean Combs faces two new federal charges for sex trafficking and transporting individuals for prostitution. The expanded indictment increases legal jeopardy for the music mogul. 

The legal storm surrounding Sean “Diddy” Combs has intensified with the filing of a superseding indictment on Thursday, adding two more serious federal charges to his already explosive criminal case. The new allegations mark a dangerous expansion in both timeline and scope, casting a darker shadow over one of hip hop’s most iconic and once untouchable figures.

Federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York now accuse Combs of sex trafficking by force, fraud, or coercion between 2021 and 2024, and of transporting multiple individuals with intent to engage in prostitution during the same period. These fresh counts augment previous charges spanning from 2009 to 2018, bringing the alleged criminal activity almost up to the moment of his September 2024 arrest.

While Combs has pleaded not guilty and continues to deny all allegations through his legal team, the latest indictment frames his empire — Combs Enterprises — as a full-blown criminal organization operating for two decades, committing acts of racketeering, kidnapping, arson, bribery, forced labor, and sexual abuse. Prosecutors argue that the very machinery of his music, fashion, and liquor businesses was used not only to protect his brand but to enable and hide his alleged crimes.

In what could become one of the most consequential trials involving a celebrity in decades, jury selection is set to begin May 5, with opening statements expected May 12. If convicted, Combs could face decades in prison.

In parallel, Combs is drowning in civil litigation — with over two dozen lawsuits filed against him for sexual assault, trafficking, and rape. The criminal trial will undoubtedly cast a long shadow over those proceedings, and vice versa.

What began as whispers of misconduct around Combs has now erupted into a federal case revealing what prosecutors describe as a “persistent and pervasive pattern of abuse” — not just as an individual, but as the leader of a corporate system that allegedly preyed on the vulnerable behind the glitz and gloss of celebrity culture. This is no longer just about Combs the artist or entrepreneur. It’s about Combs the alleged crime boss.

Ethiopia Deploys 2,500 Troops to Crush Al-Shabaab and Stabilize Somalia Under New AU Initiative.

Ethiopia deploys thousands of troops under the African Union’s new peacekeeping force in Somalia, intensifying efforts to eliminate Al-Shabaab and reshape regional power dynamics. 

Ethiopia’s involvement marks a pivotal moment. Once facing resistance from Somalia over a deal with Somaliland, Ethiopia’s role was secured through diplomatic breakthroughs facilitated by Turkey. The new mission’s objective is unambiguous: to bolster Somali security forces and aggressively reclaim territory from Al-Shabaab militants, notorious for deadly attacks destabilizing East Africa.

Ethiopia joins forces from Uganda, Djibouti, Kenya, and Egypt—each contributing significant military personnel. Particularly notable is Egypt’s deployment of 1,100 troops, reflecting Cairo’s broader ambitions amid tense disputes with Ethiopia over the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam. These strategic moves underscore how the fight against Al-Shabaab intersects with larger geopolitical rivalries.

Funding and sovereignty remain contentious issues, with Somalia demanding clear agreements like the new Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) to safeguard national interests. Still, the mission faces financial uncertainty, relying heavily on international aid from the United States, EU, Turkey, and China.

The real test for Ethiopia and its partners will be effectiveness on the ground. Despite decades of international intervention, Al-Shabaab remains lethal, recently targeting Somali President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s convoy. The coalition’s success in dismantling Al-Shabaab’s strongholds will determine if this latest effort brings lasting peace or further regional turmoil.

Ultimately, Ethiopia’s bold troop deployment could turn the tide against terrorism—if regional politics and resource struggles don’t undermine the mission first.

Court demands U.S. bring back Kilmar Abrego Garcia, wrongly deported despite legal protection, spotlighting chaotic enforcement under Trump policies.

A federal judge has ordered the U.S. government to return Kilmar Abrego Garcia from El Salvador after an unlawful deportation, exposing deep flaws in Trump’s aggressive immigration agenda.

A U.S. District Court has ordered the government to immediately return Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a legally residing Maryland man wrongfully deported to El Salvador. Judge Paula Xinis gave the administration until April 7 to reverse what she called a blatant legal violation that left Abrego Garcia stranded and separated from his U.S. citizen wife and young child.

The Trump administration, which had already admitted to the error, claimed it lacked the authority to bring him back. The judge disagreed. “They put him there, they can bring him back,” said Andrew Rossman, part of Abrego’s newly formed legal team from Quinn Emanuel.

The deportation, executed in March alongside mass removals of alleged gang affiliates, was part of a broader Trump initiative invoking the 1798 Alien Enemies Act—a move that critics call unconstitutional and reckless. But Abrego wasn’t even deported under that archaic wartime law. Despite a 2019 court order protecting him, he was loaded onto a third flight, hastily removed, and dumped in a country he legally shouldn’t have been sent to.

Judge Xinis didn’t hold back, interrogating DOJ lawyer Erez Reuveni over why the U.S. hadn’t taken steps to return the man it wrongly deported. Reuveni’s response: even he didn’t have an answer.

The White House’s reaction? Defiance and deflection. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt sarcastically suggested Judge Xinis should “contact President Bukele” for help. Meanwhile, DOJ has already filed to appeal the ruling—signaling an ongoing fight over executive overreach and accountability.

The case underscores the Trump administration’s increasing reliance on obscure laws and sweeping executive authority to detain and deport, often without due process. In the chaos, lives are destroyed. Abrego Garcia’s five-year-old U.S. citizen child has been forced to live without his father. His wife sat in court witnessing a government openly confess it had no grounds to deport him—and still refusing to fix it.

This ruling isn’t just a judicial slap—it’s a warning shot. If the U.S. government continues to break its own laws in the name of “border security,” then the courts may become the last line of defense for human rights on American soil.

Somaliland health officials blame traditional slaughter and improper drug use after camel meat poisons entire family in Saaxil region

A sick camel slaughtered for Eid in Somaliland left 21 family members poisoned. Health officials warn against consuming medicated animals without proper veterinary clearance.

A Tradition Gone Toxic: How an Eid Camel Slaughter Poisoned a Whole Family in Somaliland

21 members of a single family found themselves battling for their lives after consuming meat from a sick camel—a haunting reminder of how ancient customs and modern medicines can collide with deadly consequences.

The incident unfolded in Himin village, where a family slaughtered a camel that had recently fallen ill. The animal had been treated with medication, but when no improvement was seen, it was killed for the Eid feast—a common pastoral tradition in Somali communities where wasting meat is taboo.

But this time, that tradition proved toxic.

Dr. Ismail Hussein Abdullahi, Director of the Ministry of Health in Sheikh District, confirmed that the illness stemmed from improper administration of veterinary drugs. “The medication may have been injected into the wrong vein, causing toxic accumulation, particularly in the liver—often the first part of the animal consumed during such celebrations,” he told the BBC.

The liver, considered a delicacy, turned out to be the most lethal part. Those who consumed it fell critically ill. Vomiting, diarrhea, and dehydration set in rapidly, with eight people still hospitalized in Burco, including the parents and sister of Nur Farah Bulaale, one of the victims.

While most of the family is recovering, the case has sparked fresh concern in a region where such incidents have occurred before. In 2008, more than 60 people were poisoned in a similar episode—proof that these aren’t isolated accidents but a systemic health oversight.

The Ministry of Health has now urged the public to stop slaughtering sick animals and avoid consuming any meat from livestock recently treated with medication without proper veterinary clearance. But changing rural customs takes time—and a deeper push for awareness.

This tragedy is a stark warning for communities across the Horn of Africa: in an era of evolving medicines, relying on tradition without science can have devastating consequences. What should have been a day of unity and celebration nearly turned fatal for an entire family. The lesson? Life-saving caution must now take precedence over long-held custom.

With arrest warrant looming, Netanyahu lands in Budapest—exposing a growing alliance between embattled leaders and illiberal democracies

Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu visits Hungary in defiance of ICC arrest warrant, highlighting his deepening ties with Viktor Orbán as both leaders face mounting domestic and international pressure.

An Autocrats’ Embrace: Netanyahu’s Budapest Visit Defies ICC, Emboldens Orbán

Benjamin Netanyahu’s four-day visit to Hungary is more than just a diplomatic pit stop—it’s a calculated snub to international justice and a revealing glimpse into the new safe zones emerging for embattled leaders who operate on the fringe of liberal democracy.

Landing in Budapest, the Israeli Prime Minister sought refuge in one of the few European capitals openly defying the International Criminal Court. Since the ICC issued an arrest warrant in November over alleged war crimes in Gaza, Netanyahu has carefully avoided travel to ICC-signatory countries—until now.

But Hungary under Viktor Orbán is no ordinary ICC member. Orbán was among the first to denounce the ICC’s move against Netanyahu, branding it “cynical and unacceptable.” It’s a diplomatic shield the Israeli leader eagerly accepted—at a time when his international movements are under unprecedented legal constraint.

While the official schedule touts ceremonial visits and photo ops, the real draw is Budapest’s geopolitical utility. It offers Netanyahu something rare: a platform to operate like a normal prime minister while under the shadow of an arrest warrant. More crucially, Hungary provides a discreet backchannel for foreign policy maneuvering, shielded from the watchful eyes of ICC-enforcing states.

But this visit is also deeply symbolic. It highlights the troubling axis forming between right-wing illiberal regimes: leaders who dismantle judicial independence, curtail press freedoms, and now, openly thumb their noses at international law. Netanyahu and Orbán are not just political allies—they are co-architects of a world order where accountability is optional, and democratic backsliding is masked as nationalism.

Their shared struggle for political survival—Netanyahu amid mass protests and deep war fatigue, Orbán under rising domestic opposition—makes this meeting more than ceremonial. It’s a transactional alliance of convenience, reinforcing the narrative that the rules-based international system is breaking down.

This visit might win Netanyahu a temporary reprieve from isolation, but it also exposes the shrinking map of democratic allies willing to host him. And as Orbán continues to cozy up to global outliers like Putin and Xi, Hungary’s embrace of Netanyahu becomes not just a diplomatic gesture, but a strategic alignment—one that should unsettle defenders of both international justice and liberal democracy.

Macron slams Trump’s tariff blitz as “brutal and unfounded,” calls for EU-wide retaliation and suspension of major French investments in the U.S.

French President Emmanuel Macron has called on European firms to freeze U.S. investments in response to Trump’s sweeping tariffs, escalating transatlantic economic tensions and threatening multibillion-dollar deals.

Tariff War Escalates: Macron Urges Freeze on U.S. Investments, Threatens EU Retaliation

In a sharp escalation of the transatlantic economic standoff, French President Emmanuel Macron has called on European companies to immediately suspend planned investments in the United States, following President Donald Trump’s aggressive rollout of reciprocal tariffs on global trade.

“Investments to come or investments announced in recent weeks should be suspended until things are clarified with the United States,” Macron declared on Thursday, sending shockwaves through both European boardrooms and Washington’s economic circles.

The move directly targets high-profile French commitments such as CMA CGM’s $20 billion U.S. port infrastructure plan and Schneider Electric’s $700 million expansion to support America’s AI-powered energy needs. Trump himself had championed these deals just days earlier as evidence of a booming U.S. industrial revival — a narrative Macron now seeks to unravel.

The French president didn’t stop at corporate caution. He signaled the EU might deploy its anti-coercion mechanism, a potent tool designed to counter trade bullying, while hinting at countermeasures in digital services and U.S. financial interests. “The response this time,” Macron warned, “will be more powerful than what we did after the steel and aluminum tariffs.”

Calling Trump’s tariffs “brutal and unfounded,” Macron framed the White House’s move as a direct assault on the rules-based international order. “This is a shock to global trade,” he said, pledging that Europe would respond industry by industry, deal by deal.

The clash marks a critical juncture in U.S.-EU economic relations, with billions of euros in corporate commitments hanging in the balance. And it’s not just France watching nervously — European leaders now face a defining choice: comply, retreat, or retaliate.

If Macron’s call catches momentum, it could spark the most serious economic rupture between Washington and Europe in over a decade — and send a chilling message to foreign investors weighing Trump’s “America First” doctrine against rising geopolitical risk.