Top stories
Exiled Iranian Prince Appeals to Israelis for Support in Funding Civil Disobedience Against Islamic Regime

Reza Pahlavi’s Call for Israeli Support in Funding Iranian Civil Disobedience
Reza Pahlavi, the exiled crown prince of Iran and vocal critic of the Islamic Republic, has called for an unprecedented alliance between Israelis and Iranians to overthrow the clerical regime in Tehran. Speaking at the Israeli-American Council (IAC) national summit in Washington, D.C., Pahlavi urged Israelis to help fund civil disobedience movements within Iran as part of his broader strategy for regime change.
This appeal is particularly significant given the deep-rooted animosity between Iran’s current rulers and Israel, exacerbated by decades of aggressive anti-Israel rhetoric and actions by the Iranian regime. Pahlavi’s outreach to Israelis symbolizes a sharp break from the ideological positions of the Islamic Republic, instead advocating for collaboration and solidarity between two historically hostile nations.
During his speech, Pahlavi emphasized the need for Israeli Americans, the Israeli government, and the global diaspora to support Iran’s civil disobedience movements, particularly through financial assistance. These movements, which range from labor strikes to protests, have grown in significance as the Iranian population becomes increasingly disillusioned with the regime’s repressive tactics.
Pahlavi’s appeal for Israeli involvement is grounded in his belief that external support is crucial for sustaining domestic opposition to the regime. He highlighted the difficulties that sanctions have posed for diaspora Iranians in sending financial assistance to activists inside the country, calling for a revision of U.S. sanctions to facilitate this support.
Pahlavi’s strategy is twofold: applying external pressure on the regime through sanctions and diplomatic isolation while simultaneously empowering the Iranian people to resist from within. He views Israel’s involvement as instrumental in this dual approach, particularly in providing resources and technological expertise to aid civil resistance.
Pahlavi’s outreach to Israel stands in stark contrast to the Islamic Republic’s anti-Israel stance. Since the 1979 revolution, Iran’s rulers have viewed Israel as a key adversary, funding and supporting militant groups like Hezbollah that threaten Israeli security. In recent years, tensions have escalated, with Iran’s regional influence and its nuclear program becoming flashpoints in Middle Eastern geopolitics.
However, Pahlavi’s vision for Iran rejects this adversarial posture. He envisions a future where Iran can peacefully coexist with its neighbors, including Israel, and work together on issues such as technological advancement and water management—areas where Israel excels. During his April 2023 visit to Israel, Pahlavi explored opportunities for collaboration, especially in areas like agriculture and water conservation, both critical issues for drought-stricken Iran.
By advocating for a partnership with Israel, Pahlavi positions himself as a pragmatic leader focused on Iran’s development and regional stability. His message to the Iranian people is clear: the regime’s aggressive foreign policy has only isolated Iran from potential allies and stunted the country’s growth.
While Pahlavi enjoys significant support within the Iranian diaspora, particularly among those who oppose the current regime, there are factions that remain skeptical of his outreach to Israel. These critics, some of whom support Palestinian causes, accuse him of aligning too closely with Israel, a country they view as an aggressor in the region.
Pahlavi addressed these concerns directly in his interview with Voice of America (VOA), emphasizing that his efforts are focused on Iran’s long-term interests. He pointed out that embracing Israel, particularly in technological and economic partnerships, would provide tangible benefits for Iran, helping to address pressing issues like water shortages and agricultural inefficiencies.
For Pahlavi, the Israeli-Iranian partnership is not about taking sides in regional conflicts but rather about positioning Iran to benefit from the resources and expertise that Israel can offer. His vision of a post-regime Iran includes normalized relations with Israel, the Arab world, and the West—a stark contrast to the isolationism of the current regime.
Pahlavi’s appeal to Israelis is just one part of his broader campaign to overthrow the clerical regime in Iran. He has consistently called for greater international support, both from governments and civil society, to pressure the regime while empowering the Iranian people. His message is clear: the people of Iran have already shown their discontent, but they need additional resources and international solidarity to bring about meaningful change.
Pahlavi also sees the regime’s support for groups like Hezbollah as a destabilizing force in the region, arguing that eliminating the regime would not only benefit Iran but also contribute to regional peace. By cutting off the regime’s financial and logistical support for militant proxies, Pahlavi believes Iran could play a constructive role in the Middle East, rather than fueling conflict.
Reza Pahlavi’s outreach to Israel marks a pivotal moment in the Iranian opposition’s strategy for regime change. By seeking Israeli support for civil disobedience movements in Iran, Pahlavi is signaling a new era of potential cooperation between two nations that have been adversaries for decades. His vision for a post-regime Iran is one of peace, prosperity, and regional integration—values that stand in stark contrast to the current regime’s policies.
For Pahlavi, the path to regime change runs through solidarity, both among Iranians and with the international community, including Israel. The success of his campaign will depend on the extent to which he can unite these forces and sustain the momentum for change within Iran.
Middle East
The Iran Leak that Shook Israel’s Security State

Did Netanyahu just leak Israel’s war plans to save his image? Netanyahu under fire after NYT bombshell reveals Israeli plans to strike Iran; officials call it “one of the most dangerous leaks in Israel’s history.”
A crisis is unfolding in Israel—not just over Iran’s nuclear threat, but over a leak that’s ignited a political firestorm in Jerusalem. A senior Israeli official has told The Jerusalem Post that the recent New York Times report detailing Israeli plans to strike Iran’s nuclear program with US support is “one of the most dangerous leaks in Israel’s history.”
This isn’t just about national security. It’s about political survival.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu now finds himself at the center of a storm, with multiple Israeli politicians accusing him of deliberately leaking the classified operation details to shield himself from political fallout. His critics argue that the leak served as a distraction—a calculated maneuver to silence accusations that he talks tough on Iran but fails to deliver decisive military action.
Former defense minister Avigdor Lieberman didn’t hold back, tweeting: “How lucky we were that Netanyahu wasn’t prime minister when we bombed the nuclear reactors in Syria and Iraq.” His point? Past leaders acted. Netanyahu, critics say, leaks.
The revelation that Israel seriously weighed a joint strike with the US against Iran’s nuclear facilities—one that could have started a regional war—has sent shockwaves across both the intelligence and military communities. Not only was the IDF reportedly prepared to carry out the operation, but the entire strategy was contingent on US approval, which Trump ultimately denied in favor of diplomatic talks.
Now the damage is twofold: Iran has been tipped off, and Israel’s deterrence narrative has taken a hit.
While Netanyahu continues to claim that Iran will never be allowed to go nuclear on his watch, the Israeli public and global observers are left wondering: Did he just sabotage one of the most sensitive defense strategies of the decade—for the sake of headlines?
This leak doesn’t just threaten operational secrecy. It weakens trust within Israel’s security establishment, sends mixed signals to Tehran, and erodes confidence among US allies. In the end, the greatest threat to Israeli security might not come from Iranian centrifuges—but from within Israel’s own political machinery.
Top stories
Al-Shabaab’s Resurgence Exposes Flaws in Somalia’s War Strategy

Militant capture of Aadan Yabaal questions Mogadishu’s military momentum amid eroding public trust and fragile international support.
The fall of Aadan Yabaal to Al-Shabaab isn’t just a battlefield loss—it’s a strategic and psychological blow to the Somali government’s credibility. President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s attempt to reassure the nation that “momentum shifts” are part of war may ring hollow to a public that’s heard the same line since the early 2000s. After two years of claiming gains, how did the jihadists storm a symbolic stronghold with apparent ease?
Al-Shabaab’s capture of Aadan Yabaal shows the Somali military’s offensive was never as comprehensive or irreversible as claimed. Frontline forces remain underfunded and stretched thin. Tactical vacuums and inconsistent control of retaken towns are leaving doors wide open for ambushes. If elite units can’t hold strategic hubs like Aadan Yabaal, then what is really under government control?
President Mohamud’s warning about waning international support is an admission of dependency—Somalia’s war effort hinges more on foreign aid than national resolve. With US counterterrorism strikes declining, AMISOM rebranded into a lighter version, and donor fatigue mounting, the illusion of “progress” is rapidly dissolving. Al-Shabaab isn’t just surviving—it’s adapting, exploiting weaknesses, and regaining ground.
The president may plead for morale, but it’s morale in Mogadishu that’s collapsing. Every time Al-Shabaab plants its flag in a reclaimed town, it sends a louder message: Somalia’s government doesn’t have a monopoly on violence—or on legitimacy. Community militias like Ma’awisleey may be willing to fight, but they can’t hold ground without serious logistical backing. Without air support, intelligence coordination, and a functioning national army, this war will keep repeating itself.
If Somalia wants to avoid becoming a permanent failed state, its leaders must stop spinning failures into PR soundbites and start admitting the cracks in the system. The enemy is inside the walls—and still marching.
EDITORIAL
Somaliland’s Political Class: Selling Out a Nation for Profit

Somaliland’s greatest obstacle isn’t foreign policy — it’s internal corruption, nepotism, and betrayal from politicians who profit while the nation suffers. WARYATV exposes the rot.
While the people dream of recognition, their leaders cash in on betrayal.
Somaliland’s path to recognition has never been blocked by Mogadishu, Ethiopia, or even the UN. It has been sabotaged from within. Behind the speeches and flag-waving lies an elite class of politicians and businessmen who treat the nation not as a cause to fight for, but as a franchise to milk.
These men—most unelected, many unqualified—have spent decades playing the long game of stagnation. They talk sovereignty while banking silence. They chant patriotism while laundering public funds. And worst of all, they have created a system where anyone smart enough to challenge the decay is labeled a threat.
This is the intellectual apartheid of Somaliland: Educated minds are shunned, sidelined, and smeared because they expose what the ruling class desperately wants to hide—their fear of change, their fear of meritocracy, and their fear of losing control.
The result?
- Corruption reigns unchecked.
- Healthcare and education are abandoned.
- National planning is a joke.
- Recognition is sabotaged deliberately—because an internationally recognized state comes with rules and transparency, and that threatens the clan cartel currently in charge.
Somalilanders aren’t poor because of geography. They’re poor because the elite keep them that way. They’re told to wait, to pray, to believe in “diplomatic progress” while deals are cut behind closed doors and loyalty is bought, not earned. And the biggest betrayal? Business elites who actively oppose recognition, because they fear competition more than they love their flag.
Hadrawi warned us. Intelligence is punished. The thinkers, the visionaries, the honest ones—they are exiled, not by the world, but by their own people in power.
Somaliland isn’t failing because of external pressure. It’s failing because of internal cowardice. A nation hijacked by men who want the title of president, not the responsibility of statehood.
The people must stop idolizing thieves and start demanding truth. Somaliland’s dream is not dead—but it’s being strangled in silence.
Time to break the silence.
Analysis
America Pulls the Plug on Somalia: UN Funding Blocked, AUSSOM on the Brink

Trump eyes embassy closures as US rejects UN plan to fund peacekeepers in Somalia — Mogadishu’s last lifeline in peril.
The US shocks the UN by rejecting funding for African Union forces in Somalia, just as Trump weighs closing the US Embassy in Mogadishu. With Al-Shabaab advancing and oil politics heating up, is Somalia doomed to implode?
The United States just signaled the collapse of Somalia’s last fragile security architecture — and it did so with chilling clarity. Washington has publicly rejected UN efforts to fund the African Union Stabilization Support Mission in Somalia (AUSSOM), effectively gutting any hope for predictable peacekeeping operations in a country teetering on the edge of collapse.
This isn’t just a bureaucratic snub — it’s a geopolitical death sentence for Somalia. Al-Shabaab militants are already testing the vacuum, launching a multi-pronged assault on Adan Yabaal, a key military base in Middle Shabelle. If confirmed, the town’s fall would mark the largest strategic loss since Somalia launched its offensive against terror in 2022.
UN Secretary-General António Guterres warned the Security Council: no funding, no peace. But the US—under Trump’s second-term posture—is slamming the door shut, labeling Somalia as unfit for a hybrid funding model under Resolution 2719. Diplomats are in a panic. Meanwhile, Trump is reportedly planning to close up to 30 diplomatic missions, with Mogadishu’s embassy topping the list.
Somalia’s response? Desperation disguised as diplomacy. The FGS is now peddling oil blocks in contested territories like Nugaal Valley. In a flashy announcement on X, Somalia’s ambassador to the US declared “Somalia is open for drilling,” targeting American firms with an offer it legally and militarily cannot secure.

Somalia’s Ambassador to the United States, Dahir Hassan Arab
The move comes after Somalia’s recognition of SSC-Khaatumo — a region still engulfed in the political wreckage of its war with Somaliland.
This isn’t about development. It’s about weaponizing recognition, resource manipulation, and fake sovereignty in a bid to win Trump’s favor and undermine Somaliland’s momentum.
But while Hargeisa builds forests and attracts foreign media praise, Mogadishu is drowning in debt, insurgency, and denial. The West is tuning out, and even the UN is losing patience. The US, once Somalia’s diplomatic oxygen, is now pulling the plug.
Somalia is not rising — it’s being unplugged.
Commentary
China Slaps Trump With Brutal Reality Check as Trade War Turns Global

Chinese state media blasts Trump’s tariff war, accuses U.S. of freeloading on globalization while Xi strengthens Asian alliances.
China lashes out at Trump’s economic nationalism, accusing the U.S. of hypocrisy as global trade realigns. Rare earths, aircraft, and semiconductors are next in this economic war.
Beijing just turned up the heat—and made it personal.
China Daily, the official mouthpiece of the Chinese Communist Party, has delivered a scathing editorial aimed squarely at Donald Trump, telling him to “stop whining” and stop pretending the U.S. is a victim of global trade. “The U.S. is not getting ripped off by anybody,” it declared. “It has been taking a free ride on globalization for decades.”
The insult isn’t just rhetorical—it’s strategic. Trump’s aggressive tariff campaign, which now includes up to 145% duties on Chinese imports, has sparked the fiercest economic duel in decades. But China isn’t retreating. Instead, it’s choking U.S. exporters and fueling regional alliances that sideline Washington altogether.
Xi Jinping’s surprise regional tour, now overlapping with this tariff escalation, is no coincidence. Xi is quietly building what he calls a “strategic alliance of destiny” with Malaysia and ASEAN countries. Translation: Beijing is done playing by Trump’s rules. While the U.S. ratchets up tariffs and threatens new probes into semiconductors, pharma, and rare earths, China is reinforcing control of critical global supply chains.
The stakes? Massive. The Hong Kong postal service just banned packages to the U.S., Boeing deals are stalling, and Chinese firms are moving supply lines away from American manufacturers. Rare earth export bans are already shaking markets, and Beijing’s shadow diplomacy is redrawing global trade corridors.
Trump says, “The ball is in China’s court.” But Beijing just spiked it—with force.
Bottom line: This is not just a trade war. It’s a global economic realignment. And China’s message to the world? America’s time as the global economic sheriff is over—and it has only itself to blame.
Top stories
Russian Cult Leader Arrested in Argentina Over Child, Drugs, and Alleged Slavery

Russian cult leader Konstantin Rudnev resurfaces in Argentina in bizarre case involving childbirth, possible sex trafficking, and guru-worship.
Arrested in Argentina, Russian cult figure Konstantin Rudnev is under investigation for coercion, drug crimes, and using childbirth for citizenship. Cult control or criminal empire?
Bariloche, Argentina — a place known for lakes and mountains — is now at the center of a spiraling international scandal.
In a twisted blend of cult fanaticism, immigration schemes, and alleged sexual slavery, Russian national Konstantin Rudnev, a self-proclaimed alien guru from Sirius and former convict, was arrested at the city’s airport following the suspicious birth of a child claimed to be his. That child may now be the key to exposing what authorities say could be a disturbing network of human trafficking cloaked in cult mysticism.
Hospital staff had already flagged the nervous, malnourished 22-year-old Russian woman and her handlers days before the birth. The moment her companions insisted the baby carry Rudnev’s surname — despite her visible fear and silence — alarms were triggered. Within days, Argentinian police swooped in. Rudnev was arrested along with over a dozen of his alleged disciples, all showing signs of cult control: malnourishment, secrecy, and submission.
The investigation, led by prosecutor Fernando Arrigo, is looking into whether Rudnev sought to exploit Argentina’s citizenship-by-birth policy. His alleged aim? Obtain legal status and protection by fathering a child in the country — possibly against the mother’s will.
But this is no ordinary immigration scam. Authorities recovered disturbing evidence from multiple rented properties: drug-laced pills, satellite communications, fasting punishments, and cells lined with floor mattresses and blacked-out windows — all hallmarks of coercive cult behavior.
Rudnev’s resume reads like dystopian fiction: convicted in 2013 for rape, drug crimes, and running a cult that stripped people of their autonomy, he told followers he was sent by aliens to save humanity. His book The Way of the Fool mocked jobs, families, and logic — encouraging complete submission.
Now, Rudnev is in custody, but the shadow of his cult still lingers. Were the followers victims or willing disciples? Was the newborn a passport, a symbol, or something darker?
If Argentina’s probe reveals that Rudnev resurrected his Russian cult to traffic women and abuse citizenship laws, this will be more than a bizarre spiritual scam — it will be one of the most chilling cross-border cult cases in recent memory.
Top stories
Trump’s Second Term: Speed, Shock, and a Nation Struggling to Keep Up

From mass firings to trade wars and geopolitical whiplash, Trump 2.0 is chaos on steroids—and the global fallout has just begun.
Trump’s second term is moving faster than Washington, Wall Street, or Main Street can absorb. Tariffs, purges, and reversals are fueling confusion, economic anxiety, and global instability.
“Move fast and break things” isn’t just Trump’s method—it’s now U.S. policy.
In his second term, President Donald Trump has stormed out of the gate like a man racing against time—and reality. From slapping 145% tariffs on China to firing thousands of federal workers by weekend email, Trump is governing with the urgency of a president who knows the clock is ticking. With GOP control of Congress and midterms looming, he’s pressing executive power to its constitutional limits—and maybe beyond.
The results? Chaos, confusion, and contradiction.
Trump’s team has reversed itself multiple times on major issues: trade with China, tech tariffs, deportations, and economic messaging. Even his own allies are scrambling to understand what policy applies on any given day. Canada, burned by steel and aluminum tariffs, says it has “no idea what’s actually been lifted.” Inside the U.S., small business owners like Mark Overbay are trying to plan pricing around a policy that changes with Trump’s tweets.
The “panic index” is spiking. Consumer confidence is collapsing. Supply chains are disoriented. Retirement funds are bleeding again. Even Social Security callers are getting busy signals at record rates as agencies buckle under hasty mass firings.
Meanwhile, Trump’s ambitions have no ceiling. In just 100 days, he’s tried to end the Russia-Ukraine war, restart Iran nuclear talks, annex Greenland, punish Canada, rebuild U.S. factories, and turn Gaza into a luxury resort.
This is not governance—it’s global whiplash.
“There’s no method. No strategy. Just raw speed and spectacle,” says one Canadian diplomat. Judge James Bredar slammed the firings: “Move fast? Fine. Break things? Not the law.”
But Trump’s allies say that’s exactly the point. He doesn’t want to govern slower. He wants revenge, legacy, and transformation—at warp speed.
Whether the system—and the world—can withstand that pressure? That’s the real test of Trump 2.0.
Top stories
Trump’s Iran Gamble: Talks May Backfire, Strengthen Tehran’s Terror Regime, Warns INSS Expert

Trump’s “premature optimism” in nuclear talks could help Iran supercharge its arsenal and destabilize the Middle East, Israeli security expert says.
Dr. Benny Sabti of INSS warns that Trump’s direct talks with Iran may embolden the regime, accelerate its nuclear ambitions, and weaken Israel’s security edge.
Is Trump walking into a trap with Tehran? That’s the warning from Dr. Benny Sabti, a top Iran analyst at Israel’s Institute for National Security Studies (INSS), who is sounding the alarm over Washington’s newest nuclear diplomacy push with the Islamic Republic.
In an exclusive with Maariv, Sabti torched President Trump’s “premature optimism,” calling it not only a diplomatic blunder but a strategic risk to Israel, Saudi Arabia, and the broader Middle East. “You don’t call talks successful after two hours,” Sabti fumed. “You’re signaling weakness—and Iran knows how to exploit that.”
The core concern: Trump may be laying the groundwork for a return to the very nuclear deal he pulled out of in 2018, without full dismantlement, without iron-clad inspections, and with potential sanctions relief that could flood Iran’s economy with foreign currency. That, Sabti warns, would revive the regime—and bankroll its terror proxies.
While Iran plays hardball, the U.S. still hasn’t eased sanctions, but the regime senses a win. “They’re calculating,” Sabti said. “Partial relief is enough to reactivate Iran’s global trade machine. Once that happens, there’s no turning back. You’re not weakening Iran—you’re rescuing it.”
Even more dangerous is the false theater unfolding in Iran’s parliament, which Sabti dismisses as staged political drama. “There’s no real disagreement in Tehran,” he warned. “It’s all for show. The regime isn’t compromising—it’s stalling.”
Sabti also took aim at Trump’s reliance on Oman as mediator, noting the sultanate’s long history of cozy ties with Tehran. “You can’t win a war of pressure if your middleman is working both sides,” he said.
Bottom line? Sabti doesn’t believe diplomacy will stop Iran’s nuclear ambitions. “You have to go all in—sanctions, sabotage, even military options. This ‘a little here, a little there’ approach? It’s suicide.”
And for Israel? “If the Iranians believe they’ve outplayed the Americans, they will sprint toward the bomb. And we’ll all pay for it.”
-
Analysis1 month ago
Saudi Arabia’s Billion-Dollar Bid for Eritrea’s Assab Port
-
ASSESSMENTS2 weeks ago
Operation Geel Exposes the Truth: International Community’s Reluctance to Embrace Somaliland as a Strategic Ally
-
Somaliland3 months ago
Somaliland and UAE Elevate Ties to Comprehensive Strategic Partnership
-
Africa1 year ago
How Somaliland Could Lead the Global Camel Milk Industry
-
Analysis1 year ago
Iran escalates conflict, attacking Israel; US forces help Israel to intercept Iranian projectiles
-
Top stories11 months ago
Gunmen Kill 11 in Southeastern Nigeria Attack, Army Reports
-
Analysis1 year ago
Israel and Iran on Edge: Tensions Escalate Amidst Rising Threats
-
TECH11 months ago
Zimbabwe Approves Licensing of Musk’s Starlink Internet Service