Sweden’s military is seeking long-range strike capabilities that would allow it to hit targets deep inside Russia, arguing that only such systems can deter Moscow as Europe faces its most volatile security environment in decades.
In a report delivered to the government this week, the Swedish Armed Forces urged the acquisition of cruise missiles with ranges of up to 2,000 kilometers — more than enough to reach well beyond Moscow and deep into Russian military infrastructure.
Defense Minister Pål Jonson said the recommendation reflects lessons drawn from the war in Ukraine, where Russia has relied heavily on long-range missiles, ballistic systems and drones to pressure Kyiv from afar.
“The experience from the war in Ukraine indicates that Russia is vigorously developing its long-range capabilities,” Jonson told Reuters. “We must build a stronger deterrent against that threat.”
The distance between Stockholm and Moscow is roughly 1,000 kilometers — meaning a 2,000-kilometer weapon system would give Sweden the ability to strike far beyond Russia’s western military districts if ever required.
Sweden’s air force has already ordered the Swedish-German Taurus cruise missile, which has an estimated range of 500 kilometers and can be equipped on the JAS 39 Gripen. But Jonson suggested that the government may pursue additional platforms as part of a broader shift toward deeper strike capability.
The military’s report also warns that Russia is expected to expand its overall force capacity within the next five years, despite battlefield losses in Ukraine. To counter that trend, the Swedish Armed Forces recommended significant investments in air and missile defense, enhanced intelligence collection, and expansion of Sweden’s drone and satellite reconnaissance programs.
The proposal reflects Sweden’s new strategic posture as the country prepares to integrate fully into NATO. Long-range strike capabilities, currently limited to a handful of alliance members, would mark a major evolution in Sweden’s defense doctrine — one aimed at both deterring future aggression and reinforcing the alliance’s northern flank.
