The United States on Thursday firmly rejected the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) decision to issue arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, accusing them of committing war crimes during Israel’s ongoing military operations in Gaza.

A White House spokesperson dismissed the ICC’s actions, stating the court has no jurisdiction over Israel, which is not a party to the Rome Statute that governs the ICC. The U.S., also a non-member of the court, has long maintained that the ICC should not investigate nationals of non-member states unless referred by the United Nations Security Council.

U.S. Government Response

“The United States rejects the detention order against Israeli officials based on the court’s decision,” the spokesperson said, criticizing the move as both legally flawed and politically motivated.

Rep. Michael McCaul (R-TX), chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, condemned the warrants as a “dangerous precedent” and part of a campaign that overlooks the realities of the war in Gaza. He underscored that Israel has an independent judiciary capable of investigating allegations of misconduct.

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) echoed this sentiment, accusing the ICC of corruption and bias against Israel. Graham called for legislative measures to shield American and allied officials from what he described as “politically motivated prosecutions” by international tribunals.

Netanyahu’s Reaction

Netanyahu’s office labeled the ICC “a corrupt and discriminatory political institution” and the allegations “absurd.” In a statement, his office defended Israel’s military campaign in Gaza, describing it as the most justified war in the country’s history, aimed at combating terrorism and safeguarding its citizens.

Netanyahu also criticized ICC prosecutor Karim Khan, accusing him of bias and calling for a broader investigation into what he termed the court’s failures.

Broader International Reactions

The ICC warrants, issued as part of an investigation into alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza, have drawn mixed responses globally:

• European Union: Josep Borrell, the EU foreign policy chief, called for adherence to international legal norms but stopped short of fully endorsing the ICC’s ruling.
• Jordan: Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi supported the ICC’s jurisdiction and emphasized the importance of accountability for actions in Gaza.
• France: The French Foreign Ministry urged conflict resolution based on international law.
• Netherlands: The Dutch government, where the ICC is headquartered, signaled its readiness to execute the arrest warrants if Netanyahu or Gallant traveled to ICC member states.

The ICC’s decision has reignited debates over its jurisdictional reach. Israel, like the U.S., is not a party to the Rome Statute, and both nations argue that the court has no authority to investigate their citizens. The ICC, however, claims jurisdiction over alleged crimes committed in territories recognized by the United Nations as part of Palestine, including Gaza and the West Bank.

Netanyahu and Gallant face potential arrest if they enter any of the 123 countries that are ICC members. Both have rejected the court’s authority, emphasizing Israel’s right to self-defense against Hamas, which they accuse of committing atrocities during its October 7 attacks and the subsequent Gaza conflict.

The ICC’s decision comes amid Israel’s military campaign in Gaza, launched after the October 7 attacks by Hamas that killed over 1,200 people and resulted in the kidnapping of hundreds. Israel’s government has framed its actions as a legitimate response to Hamas’s terrorism.

Hamas, designated as a terrorist organization by the U.S., EU, Israel, and others, continues to face international scrutiny for its actions. Meanwhile, the ICC ruling highlights the growing polarization over how to address accountability in the Gaza conflict.

For the U.S., the ICC’s move underscores tensions over international justice mechanisms and their application to non-member states, as Washington continues to stand by its ally Israel.

The International Criminal Court (ICC) issued arrest warrants on Thursday for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, and Hamas military chief Muhammad Deif, accusing them of war crimes and crimes against humanity. The charges stem from the ongoing Israel-Hamas conflict, which erupted following Hamas’ October 7, 2023, attack on Israel.

Netanyahu and Gallant are accused of using starvation as a method of warfare, alongside crimes against humanity including murder and persecution. The ICC said these alleged crimes occurred between October 8, 2023, and May 20, 2024.

Israel, which is not a member of the ICC, has rejected the charges. Netanyahu called the allegations “absurd and false,” maintaining that Israel’s military campaign in Gaza is a legitimate act of self-defense against Hamas. Gallant, recently dismissed by Netanyahu, has yet to issue a formal response.

While the ICC lacks jurisdiction over Israel directly, the arrest warrants could complicate international travel for Netanyahu and Gallant, as ICC member states are obligated to enforce such warrants.

Hamas military leader Muhammad Deif faces charges of crimes against humanity, including murder, hostage-taking, and sexual violence. These charges relate to Hamas’ October 7 assault, which killed approximately 1,200 people, including 46 U.S. citizens, and resulted in the abduction of about 250 hostages. Hamas is designated a terrorist organization by the United States, the European Union, and other Western nations.

Following Hamas’ attack, Israel launched an extensive military campaign in Gaza. According to the Gaza health ministry, about 44,000 people have been killed, over half of them reportedly women and children. The figures have not been independently verified, and the death toll includes both combatants and civilians.

The ICC prosecutor, Karim Khan, described the charges as part of the court’s mandate to hold accountable those responsible for atrocities, regardless of their political or military status.

The arrest warrants underscore the ICC’s attempt to address alleged violations on both sides of the conflict. However, the court’s jurisdictional limitations and the political sensitivities surrounding the Israel-Palestine issue are likely to provoke significant international debate.

While the ICC warrants have no immediate enforcement mechanism against Netanyahu, Gallant, or Deif, they mark a symbolic moment in international law, reflecting growing scrutiny of the conduct in one of the world’s most volatile conflicts.

Despite Israel’s ongoing offensives against Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza, neither group has been critically weakened, according to Brett Holmgren, acting director of the U.S. National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC). Speaking in Washington, Holmgren noted that while Israeli intelligence and military strikes have considerably diminished these groups’ abilities to attack Israel, both retain significant assets and influence.

Holmgren highlighted Hezbollah’s substantial resources, including extensive missile stockpiles and well-armed ground forces in southern Lebanon. He acknowledged that Israeli operations have damaged Hezbollah’s leadership but stressed that the group’s “external capabilities” remain mostly unaffected, posing potential threats beyond the Middle East. U.S. officials remain on high alert for indications that Hezbollah could pursue retaliatory attacks abroad.

Hamas, which instigated the recent conflict with its October 7, 2023, attack on Israel, has faced major losses. U.S. assessments indicate the group’s shift toward insurgent-style tactics, including hit-and-run strikes. Yet, Holmgren warned that Hamas’s appeal endures, particularly among disenfranchised youth in Gaza, where viable political alternatives are lacking.

Prior to the attack, U.S. intelligence estimated Hamas’s forces between 20,000 and 30,000, and Hezbollah’s at around 40,000. Israeli estimates suggest they have neutralized about 14,000 Hamas fighters and over 2,500 Hezbollah fighters. Despite Israel’s destruction of around 80% of Hezbollah’s short- and medium-range rockets, the group’s entrenched influence in Lebanon remains substantial.

Concerns are rising that the escalating death toll in Gaza and Lebanon could inspire further extremism. U.S. officials report an uptick in propaganda from groups like ISIS and al-Qaida, which are exploiting the conflict to bolster recruitment. ISIS activities in central Syria and the IS-Khorasan affiliate in Afghanistan continue to pose serious challenges, with the latter benefiting from Taliban control issues.

In Africa, ISIS and al-Qaida affiliates have surged, particularly in the Sahel, where instability has worsened as local governments increasingly turn to Russian security forces. The U.S. warns this trend could become a major long-term threat if left unchecked.

With Hezbollah and Hamas under strain, the U.S. anticipates that Iran may leverage its regional proxies for retaliatory actions against U.S. and Israeli interests. Iran’s support of groups like al-Qaida also remains a key concern, as does Tehran’s influence strategy, which U.S. officials have observed targeting U.S. political dynamics, including the recent election.

Holmgren affirmed the NCTC’s commitment to working with the incoming Trump administration to safeguard U.S. and allied interests against these evolving threats, ensuring a seamless transition for national security operations.

Israel launched intense airstrikes across southern Lebanon and the Bekaa Valley on Wednesday, targeting towns where the militant group Hezbollah maintains influence. The strikes, which resulted in dozens of casualties, come amid an ongoing 13-month conflict between Israel and Hezbollah that has claimed more than 3,000 lives in Lebanon alone, with a significant escalation since Israeli ground forces entered southern Lebanon on October 1.

In a prerecorded statement, Hezbollah’s leader, Naim Kassem, issued a stark warning to Israel, vowing to continue the resistance until Israel “seeks to demand an end to the aggression.” Kassem hinted at the potential for indirect negotiations, should Israel halt its operations.

The strikes hit Hezbollah strongholds in Beirut’s southern suburbs and multiple locations in the eastern Baalbek-Hermel governorate. Governor Bachir Khodr, who reported the casualty numbers, said rescue operations continue amid the rubble left by at least 40 Israeli raids. In response, Hezbollah launched rockets at northern and central Israel, with air-raid sirens sounding as far south as Tel Aviv.

The conflict’s repercussions are also being felt in Gaza, where Israeli incursions against Hamas in the north have led to the displacement of over 100,000 civilians, according to U.N. estimates.

UNRWA Faces Scrutiny as Israel Targets Agency’s Role in Gaza

In the United Nations, UNRWA, the U.N. agency dedicated to supporting Palestinian refugees, is facing an existential threat as Israel’s parliament moves to ban its operations in Gaza. Established in 1949, UNRWA plays a central role in the humanitarian aid infrastructure for Palestinians, with a significant presence in Gaza.

UNRWA Commissioner General Philippe Lazzarini issued a plea for international intervention, warning that dismantling the agency would plunge Palestinian territories into deeper chaos. Israeli officials allege UNRWA’s complicity with Hamas and accuse the agency of harboring staff with ties to terrorist activities, though UNRWA maintains that no concrete evidence has been presented.

The proposed Israeli legislation has sparked a backlash from international representatives. General Assembly President Philemon Yang condemned the move, while ambassadors from several states expressed alarm at the precedent this could set for the United Nations’ autonomy.

“The eviction of a U.N. agency by the decision of a single member state would set an alarming precedent,” Belgian Ambassador Philippe Kridelka stated, representing a coalition of 16 countries supporting UNRWA’s role.

In northeastern Lebanon, rescue efforts are ongoing after Israeli airstrikes reportedly killed at least 52 people in the Bekaa Valley, as confirmed by Lebanon’s Health Ministry. The strikes, which injured 72 others, prompted mass evacuations, with video footage capturing buildings reduced to rubble and smoke clouding the area. In Beirut’s southern suburb of Dahiyeh, Israeli jets also struck dozens of structures, although no casualties were reported.

The IDF has claimed responsibility for the overnight attacks, stating that intelligence-targeted strikes aimed at Hezbollah’s alleged weapons facilities, central command sites, and infrastructure in southern Lebanon were conducted, reportedly with prior warnings to civilians. The escalation follows recent Hezbollah rocket attacks, which, according to IDF reports, killed seven people in northern Israel. Lebanon’s acting Prime Minister Najib Mikati condemned the strikes as an expansion of Israeli aggression, casting doubt on ceasefire efforts amid ongoing U.S.-led diplomatic interventions.

In Gaza, Israeli strikes on the Nuseirat refugee camp killed over 30 people, adding to a severe humanitarian crisis in the territory. Leaders of major U.N. agencies have described the situation as “apocalyptic,” highlighting the denial of essential humanitarian aid to Gaza’s displaced populations.

Meanwhile, Secretary of State Antony Blinken reiterated the need for Israel to comply with U.N. Security Council Resolution 1701, which mandates Hezbollah’s withdrawal from areas south of the Litani River. Blinken and Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin have also pressed Israel to expedite humanitarian access to Gaza, linking future U.S. military support to these efforts.

The conflicts across Lebanon and Gaza underscore the region’s volatility following Hamas’s deadly October 2023 attack on Israel, which triggered the current escalation. In the intervening weeks, casualties have mounted on both sides, displacing millions and deepening the humanitarian crisis across affected areas.

As hostilities intensify across multiple Middle Eastern fronts, casualties continue to mount. Fighting on Thursday claimed lives in Israel, Lebanon, the West Bank, and Gaza. In Israel, five people, including an Israeli farmer and four foreign workers, died when projectiles launched from Lebanon struck northern regions. In response, Israeli forces targeted southern Lebanon, reportedly killing at least eight individuals, among them six health workers.

Amid the escalating regional conflict, U.S. and Israeli officials met to explore a ceasefire with Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza, with both groups receiving military and financial backing from Iran. Talks centered on implementing U.N. Security Council Resolution 1701, which would mandate Hezbollah’s withdrawal from southern Lebanon, a longstanding but largely unfulfilled measure. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu underscored the need for any agreement to secure Israel’s safety, adding that an effective resolution should enforce measures that prevent threats along its northern border.

The situation in Gaza remains dire. Israeli airstrikes have killed at least 46 Palestinians, with further civilian casualties reported in central Gaza’s Nuseirat camp, where a paramedic and two journalists were among 16 killed. In the West Bank, Israeli military actions near the Nur Shams refugee camp claimed three lives. UNRWA, the U.N. agency supporting Palestinian refugees, reported that its local office sustained significant damage from Israeli bulldozers, rendering it unusable.

With U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken confirming “good progress” on advancing understandings around U.N. Resolution 1701, there is guarded optimism for reducing hostilities. However, Hezbollah’s leader, Naim Kassem, indicated continued resistance until agreeable ceasefire terms are met, while Israel demands a return of Hezbollah forces beyond the Litani River and support from the Lebanese army to secure border regions.

Complicating peace efforts, Gaza remains engulfed in violence since the October 7, 2023, Hamas assault on Israel, which killed 1,200 people and saw 250 hostages captured. In response, Israel’s military campaign has led to over 43,100 reported Palestinian deaths, largely civilians, and displaced about 90% of Gaza’s 2.3 million residents. The recent meeting between U.S. President Joe Biden and Cypriot President Nikos Christodoulides highlighted the urgent need for humanitarian aid channels, with Cyprus playing a pivotal role in facilitating assistance to the region.

Naim Kassem, recently named Hezbollah’s new leader after Hassan Nasrallah’s reported death in an Israeli airstrike, has affirmed that Hezbollah will persist in fighting Israel until a cease-fire is achieved under terms acceptable to the group. In his first public address since assuming leadership, Kassem stated that Hezbollah would not seek an immediate truce but would consider cessation under specific conditions. This message comes as Israel continues its military operations against Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza, maintaining its stated goal of reducing the groups’ capabilities along its borders.

Israel’s security cabinet is reportedly discussing a potential 60-day truce with Hezbollah, with conditions that include Hezbollah’s retreat north of the Litani River and a Lebanese army presence along the border. An enforcement mechanism involving international intervention is also proposed to uphold the cease-fire. Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant has claimed significant degradation of Hezbollah’s missile capabilities, estimating their resources are now at 20% of previous levels due to sustained military pressure.

Amidst the conflict, U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has voiced concerns about Israeli legislation that would bar the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) from operating in Gaza. He warned of severe humanitarian consequences for Palestinian refugees if the legislation proceeds, emphasizing that it could violate international obligations. Israel’s envoy to the U.N. countered that UNRWA has become a “front for Hamas.”

Meanwhile, international mediators, including U.S. officials Brett McGurk and Amos Hochstein, are en route to the Middle East for discussions aimed at de-escalating tensions in both Lebanon and Gaza. The outcome of these diplomatic efforts remains uncertain as both Israeli and Hezbollah forces intensify their military activities, with the potential for further escalation looming if negotiations do not yield a mutually acceptable truce.

In a large-scale military operation, Israel’s Defense Forces (IDF) executed a calculated aerial assault targeting specific Iranian military sites. Over 100 aircraft, including advanced F-35 “Adir” stealth fighters, undertook the operation, which spanned roughly 2,000 kilometers and concentrated on strategic locations within Iran, notably Tehran and Karaj. In what officials describe as a preemptive, defensive maneuver, the IDF aimed to disable Iranian military capabilities while carefully avoiding nuclear and oil sites, an approach meant to prevent escalation beyond the immediate conflict zone.

According to IDF sources, the operation unfolded in multiple waves. The first wave focused on dismantling radar and air defense installations, laying the groundwork for subsequent attacks on military compounds. This stage-by-stage approach aimed to ensure minimal resistance from Iranian defense systems. The IDF’s tactical preparation included a coordinated strike on Syrian air defenses in the hours leading up to the operation, mitigating the risk of Iranian forces in Syria detecting Israel’s strategy.

Managing a mission of this magnitude required extensive resources, particularly in terms of logistics and fuel. Long-distance operations such as these involve mid-air refueling capabilities, a crucial asset in sustained airborne maneuvers. In addition, Israel’s elite 669 Rescue Unit was placed on high alert to respond to any emergency, underscoring the high-stakes nature of the mission.

Defense Minister Yoav Gallant and Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Herzi Halevi reportedly monitored the operation from the IDF’s headquarters in Tel Aviv, maintaining direct lines of communication with the Security Cabinet, which authorized the strike in a late-night conference call. An IDF spokesperson, Rear Admiral Daniel Hagari, affirmed the IDF’s readiness for both defensive and offensive actions in response to any potential fallout. He added that, while there are currently no changes in public safety guidelines from the Home Front Command, citizens should remain vigilant and await updates.

The strike, according to a senior Israeli official, came in direct response to an October 1 missile attack attributed to Iranian forces, signaling a shift in Israel’s strategic tolerance for perceived Iranian provocations. The White House expressed support, asserting that Israel’s military actions align with its right to self-defense. U.S. officials disclosed that Israel provided advanced notice of the operation, allowing President Biden to remain updated in real time as events unfolded.

As regional tensions simmer, Israel’s military apparatus remains on alert, monitoring possible retaliation from Iran and its regional proxies in Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, and Yemen. The incident reflects an intensified phase in Israeli-Iranian hostilities, highlighting the high-stakes security landscape in the region and the potentially far-reaching implications of these calculated maneuvers.