Somali regime scrambles to sabotage Somaliland’s U.S. recognition push by lobbying Elon Musk, Christian right, and MAGA allies

As Somaliland inches closer to U.S. recognition, Mogadishu turns to Elon Musk and Trump-aligned networks in a desperate bid to block diplomatic momentum and silence Somaliland’s rise.

Desperation in Mogadishu: Somalia Turns to Elon Musk and MAGA Allies to Derail Somaliland Recognition

Somalia’s government has reportedly reached out to tech titan Elon Musk and far-right Christian groups in a frantic bid to stop the United States from recognizing the Republic of Somaliland.

According to a bombshell report by The Africa Report, the Somali government is launching an aggressive influence campaign to sabotage Somaliland’s path to international legitimacy—particularly among U.S. Republicans aligned with Donald Trump. With whispers that Trump’s second-term foreign policy may shift dramatically in favor of Somaliland, Mogadishu is pulling every lever it can find—including religious lobbies and Silicon Valley billionaires.

The plea to Musk, though not officially confirmed, underscores how far the Somali government is willing to go. But this isn’t just about one man. It’s a full-blown anti-recognition operation, complete with hired firms and whisper campaigns to derail bipartisan support for Somaliland’s case in Washington.

Why the panic? Because Somaliland is gaining serious traction among Trump-aligned conservatives who see it as a rare gem in the Horn of Africa—a democratic, stable, pro-American entity surrounded by chaos. It offers strategic access to the Red Sea and Indian Ocean and a partnership that’s not hostage to terrorism, piracy, or internal collapse.

Reports from Semafor and Reuters confirm that Somali President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud has even proposed that his government take over Berbera and Bosaso ports—an audacious bid to undercut Somaliland’s economic autonomy and kill its chances of being seen as self-sufficient.

Mogadishu’s own ambassador to the U.S. admitted the threat openly: recognition of Somaliland, he said, would “damage relations” with Washington. But the real damage lies in Somalia’s failure to offer peace, unity, or even basic governance—while Somaliland has functioned independently for over three decades.

With Somaliland Foreign Minister Abdirahman Dahir Aden landing in Washington this week, the stakes are sky-high. Mogadishu is rattled. Trump allies in Congress are rallying. And Somaliland’s case, long ignored, is now center stage in a geopolitical battle that could redefine U.S. influence in East Africa.

One thing is clear: Somalia isn’t just losing control of the narrative—it’s losing the region’s future. And no billionaire intervention will stop the inevitable tide of Somaliland’s rising recognition.

In recent commentary, esteemed South African journalist Izak Khomo has fearlessly convened a dialogue that brings to light the often-ignored historical atrocities faced by the people of Somaliland under the brutal regime of dictator Siyad Barre in the late 20th century. His reflections are particularly timely as they illustrate the intricate relationship between historical injustices, contemporary political realities, and overarching humanitarian imperatives.

A Historical Context: The Hidden Currents of the Siad Barre Regime

Khomo’s assertions resonate deeply, particularly when he recalls how the Barre regime forged alliances with the Apartheid government of South Africa. The disturbing truth about South Africa’s engagement in the conflict against the Isaaq people of Somaliland is a dark chapter that has been overshadowed, often lost in the larger narrative of Somali history. By hiring South African air force pilots, who indiscriminately bombed residential areas of Hargeisa, Barre’s government committed acts of violence that led to what many now refer to as the Isaaq genocide.

This partnership between Somalia and South African leaders was born out of a shared interest in suppressing dissent, but the casualties were borne by innocent civilians. The strategic military alliance between Barre and the Apartheid regime exemplifies the lengths to which despots will go to maintain power, revealing a grotesque underbelly of political opportunism wrapped in the guise of national security.

The Weight of Forgotten Histories

Khomo’s framing of Somalia politicians as “opportunists and liars” challenges the status quo, forcing a reckoning with the narratives surrounding Somalia and Somaliland. According to Khomo, the mentality that fueled Barre’s atrocities is far from extinct; it has morphed into contemporary governance that continues to sidestep the urgent need for accountability. As the current Somali government seeks recognition through various international avenues, including recent letters to Western powers, the ghosts of the past—particularly those of the Isaaq genocide—continue to haunt Somaliland.

For those unfamiliar with this dark legacy, Khomo’s commentary serves as an introduction to the complex and painful history of Somaliland and its people—a history that cannot simply be swept under the carpet.

The Resurgence of Ignored Atrocities

In exposing these dynamics, Khomo deftly links the historical reality of Barre’s regime to present-day political instability and conflict in the Horn of Africa. He warns of the impending dangers associated with the hypothetical military alliances being formed today—such as Somalia’s supposed collaboration with Egypt. The idea of Egyptian forces entering the fray under the pretense of peacekeeping raises alarm bells that echo the past; it suggests a cycle of violence that has yet to be fully resolved. The rise of terrorist groups, ongoing struggles with regional adversaries, and territorial ambitions signal potential flashpoints that could ignite further conflict.

Moreover, Khomo draws an intriguing parallel between the response of the international community and the silence surrounding Somaliland’s cries for recognition and support. The historical amnesia surrounding Somaliland’s plight—as highlighted by Khomo—inevitably impacts its ability to forge a path toward international support and recognition. If historical narratives remain truncated, how can the suffering endured by the Isaaq people ever be adequately recognized?

The Moral Imperative for Acknowledgment and Action

Khomo’s powerful expositions compel all of us—especially Somalilanders—to confront a past that may still define our current challenges. For those living in the shadow of these historical events, there lies a profound moral impetus to confront and articulate the narrative of survival and resilience.

Somaliland’s government and its elite must embrace this reckoning, acknowledging the past to build a more robust future. The call to reflect on the Isaaq genocide is not merely to revive painful memories; it is to affirm that such atrocities should never be repeated in the modern context.

Somaliland’s leadership must be vigilant and proactive—it must work to cultivate international alliances that not only recognize the rights of Somalilanders but also demand an end to the violence and historical injustice. The forgotten genocide of the past cannot remain a hallmark of silence; it must become a catalyst for change, empowerment, and justice.

Bridging the Past to Build a Better Future

Izak Khomo’s insights offer a crucial opportunity for reflection and activism among those who care about the narrative of Somaliland. Addressing the historical injustices faced by the Isaaq people is intrinsic to shaping a future for Somaliland that reflects its values of integrity, justice, and sovereignty. Only by recognizing the injustices of the past can Somaliland truly lead itself towards a brighter and more equitable tomorrow.

To move forward effectively, it is essential to weave these historical fabrics into the nation’s identity and advocate for the rightful acknowledgment of past sufferings. Only then can Somaliland emerge not merely as a historical narrative of survival but as a vibrant and sovereign entity ready to confront the challenges of the future with confidence and strength.

In one of the most surreal full-circle moments in Somaliland politics, beloved actor Yusuf Abdullahi Muse — better known to millions as Yusuf Ceegaag — is swapping the small screen for the political stage. Ceegaag, who famously portrayed a lawmaker in hit Somali dramas, is now officially running for a seat in Somaliland’s Parliament. But this time, the votes are real, and so is the power.

Ceegaag confirmed his candidacy in an interview with BBC Somali, laughing off suggestions that his announcement might be “just another role.” The irony? He once played a corrupt man who denied his sister her inheritance — a performance so convincing that fans berated him in public. “That’s when I realized just how powerful a role can be,” he said. “People don’t just watch — they feel.”

Now, Ceegaag is betting that emotional resonance can be transformed into electoral support. “I’ve played the part,” he said. “Now I want to live it.”

He joins a global cast of actors-turned-politicians: Reagan, Schwarzenegger, India’s Vijayakanth, and Ukraine’s Zelensky — the comedian who became a wartime president. But Ceegaag’s story is uniquely Somali. His roles were never just entertainment — they were critiques, reflections of society’s ugliest truths: systemic inequality, corrupt elites, and the quiet suffering of everyday citizens.

From school plays in Hargeisa to prime-time Ramadan TV, Ceegaag built a career on cultural authenticity. He made people laugh, cry, and rage — often within a single scene. And now, he’s asking them to do something even more radical: vote.

His transition from storyteller to statesman underscores a deeper truth about Somali society — that power doesn’t just come from titles or tribes. It comes from trust. And Ceegaag, for all his scripted scandals, has earned something rare: a reputation.

While some joke he’s still “stuck in character,” others say it’s exactly this blend of empathy, performance, and public connection that makes him a compelling candidate. After all, in a political landscape plagued by cynicism and corruption, maybe what Somaliland needs is someone who’s spent decades embodying the people — not exploiting them.

The curtain is rising. The cameras are off. And Yusuf Ceegaag is ready for his next role: parliamentarian.

As global tensions skyrocket, the Red Sea region edges perilously close to conflict, potentially dragging Somaliland into the eye of a geopolitical hurricane. The convergence of escalating threats involving Yemen’s Houthis, Israel, the United States, Iran, Turkey, and China raises an alarming question: Why has the Somaliland government chosen silence amid such an imminent threat?

Is Somaliland’s Government Ignoring an Impending War at Its Doorstep?

The Middle East is bracing for upheaval as the United States rapidly bolsters its military presence, indicating preparations for conflict that could ripple globally. Iran’s increasingly aggressive rhetoric against Israel intensifies fears of inevitable military clashes. The European Union has proactively instructed citizens to prepare emergency supplies, recognizing the severity of the approaching crisis.

Meanwhile, Somaliland’s strategic silence is deeply concerning. The government’s lack of transparent communication leaves citizens dangerously uninformed about looming threats, sparking criticism and speculation regarding the government’s preparedness and intentions. Somaliland, strategically positioned near critical maritime routes in the Red Sea, risks devastating consequences if conflict spills over, especially with Berbera’s vital port potentially becoming embroiled in regional turmoil.

Turkey’s support for destabilizing factions, such as the Houthis, exacerbates these risks, placing Somaliland in a precarious position. Yet, despite long-standing relationships with Western nations and the UAE, Somaliland’s leadership remains notably absent from the critical dialogues shaping their region’s fate.

The Somaliland government’s silence starkly contrasts the transparency shown by European nations actively preparing their citizens. This discrepancy fuels growing frustration and anxiety among Somalilanders, who question their leadership’s capability to navigate such volatile times.

Somaliland must immediately break its silence and provide clear strategies for confronting potential crises. The threats are real, and the government’s continued inaction risks catastrophic consequences for Somaliland’s sovereignty, stability, and security.

Citizens deserve transparency, preparedness, and leadership—not silence. Somaliland must act decisively now, or risk sleepwalking into disaster.

In a powerful and decisive response, Somaliland’s President Abdirahman Mohamed Abdullahi has sharply condemned Somalia’s President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s recent letter to U.S. President Donald Trump, which audaciously claimed control over Somaliland’s critical strategic assets, including the Port of Berbera and Berbera Airport.

President Abdullahi labeled Hassan Sheikh’s claims as “misguided, reckless, and detached from reality,” highlighting Mogadishu’s ongoing struggle to maintain authority even within its own capital. “It is both surprising and absurd,” the Somaliland leader stated bluntly, “that the President of Somalia, who struggles to maintain control over Mogadishu, is now attempting to meddle in the Republic of Somaliland’s affairs.”

Underscoring Somaliland’s established sovereignty, President Abdirahman forcefully clarified his nation’s unwavering position: “Somaliland governs its land, territory, and airspace. We are an independent, sovereign nation, and no external entity has the right to dictate our affairs.”

He further warned the international community about the grave implications of Somalia’s provocative claims, emphasizing the potential regional destabilization that Mogadishu’s actions could trigger. “We view these statements as reckless and potentially destabilizing to regional peace and stability, and we issue a stern warning against such irresponsible interference,” he declared.

Reaffirming Somaliland’s historical independence, gained from the United Kingdom on June 26, 1960, President Abdirahman highlighted the democratic principles underpinning Somaliland’s governance, emphasizing the legitimacy of its elected leadership.

In a clear and uncompromising conclusion, President Abdirahman firmly stated, “The Republic of Somaliland is not open for negotiation, compromise, or external interference. Our sovereignty belongs exclusively to our people and elected leaders.”

This robust response from Somaliland signals an intensified stance on international recognition and sovereignty, setting a powerful message that resonates not only with waryatv.com readers but with the global community watching this high-stakes regional drama unfold.

Somaliland Minister of the Presidency Khadar Hussein Abdi sharply criticized Somalia’s government, dismissing their recent attempt to offer strategic assets they neither control nor govern as a desperate diplomatic misstep.

“Somalia’s leadership should focus on its pressing challenges instead of making baseless claims over a land it neither controls nor has authority over,” Minister Khadar stated publicly. His comments followed reports of Somalia’s President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s March 16 offer to President Donald Trump, proposing control over strategic assets including Somaliland’s Berbera port and airbase—both clearly outside Mogadishu’s jurisdiction.

Minister Khadar’s remarks underscore Somalia’s increasing desperation as the government struggles to maintain stability against escalating threats from Al-Shabab, which analysts fear is inching closer to capturing Mogadishu. This chaotic situation has apparently led Somalia’s leadership to an unprecedented diplomatic blunder, attempting to barter facilities firmly under Somaliland’s sovereignty.

Berbera port is indeed crucial—not only commercially but strategically—as a potential military base for global powers like the United States, keen on maintaining a vigilant eye over regional threats and China’s expanding influence. Somaliland, pursuing international recognition for over three decades, sees a unique opportunity with the Trump administration, particularly as influential US lawmakers recently advocated opening a diplomatic office in Somaliland to strengthen strategic ties.

Minister Khadar further clarified, “Somaliland alone decides on Berbera Port’s strategic future, including its role as a key military base. The USA knows exactly who to talk to regarding Berbera’s facilities.”

Somalia’s latest diplomatic faux pas might ironically expedite Somaliland’s recognition campaign, highlighting Mogadishu’s inability to govern its claimed territories effectively.

The unfolding situation presents a vivid portrait of shifting regional power dynamics—with Somaliland positioned to emerge significantly strengthened from Somalia’s repeated strategic miscalculations.

Somaliland Foreign Minister Slams Somalia’s Desperate Attempt to Offer US Control of Strategic Ports

J. Peter Pham: Somalia’s President Insults Trump by Offering Ports He Doesn’t Control

Somaliland’s Foreign Minister, Abdirahman Dahir Aden, sharply criticized a recent move by Somalia’s government, labeling it a desperate and misguided attempt to offer the United States exclusive operational control over strategic ports along the Gulf of Aden. The offer, made despite Somalia having no control over these territories, was described by Minister Abdirahman as indicative of a “corrupted regime in Somalia on its last breath, engaged in a suicide mission,” asserting strongly that “there is nothing they can do to stop the recognition of Somaliland.”

The controversy stems from a March 16 letter by Somalia’s President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud to US President Donald Trump, as reported by Semafor. In the letter, Mohamud proposed granting the US strategic access to critical coastal assets in Berbera to reinforce American military and logistical presence and counter international competitors. However, these facilities lie in Somaliland, a independent state that Somalia does not administratively control.

Minister Abdirahman dismissed Somalia’s actions as ignorant and out of touch, telling waryatv.com: “This isn’t the first clueless move by Somalia’s president. The USA isn’t naive. They know exactly who controls Berbera port and who they need to engage with.”

The geopolitical context highlights Somalia’s increasing vulnerability, especially as Al-Shabab militants intensify threats against Mogadishu. Analysts perceive Somalia’s proposition as an act of desperation aimed at maintaining US support and influence in the region. Cameron Hudson from the Center for Strategic and International Studies underscored the absurdity of Somalia’s offer, questioning its legitimacy: “Who are they to offer that access? They are clearly trying to get the US to recognize Somalia’s claims over Somaliland.”

Somaliland has aggressively pursued international recognition for over three decades and sees a potential breakthrough under Trump’s administration. Recent developments, including statements from Trump’s advisors and a recommendation from an influential US-China subcommittee in the US House for establishing a representative office in Somaliland, signal shifting US foreign policy dynamics. Such recognition could significantly boost US intelligence capabilities, enabling surveillance of regional threats and countering Chinese influence.

In a previous bold move, Somaliland itself offered the US direct access to Berbera port in exchange for recognition back in 2022. Minister Abdirahman recently reaffirmed Somaliland’s willingness to discuss extensive cooperation with international partners, including Israel, provided recognition is prioritized.

In conclusion, Minister Abdirahman characterized Somalia’s latest actions as “reeking of desperation,” highlighting the stark contrast between Somalia’s declining control and Somaliland’s increasing strategic value. He asserted confidently that the new US administration might finally realign policies to reflect “on-the-ground realities rather than outdated legacies.”

Terror and Diplomacy: Navigating Somalia’s Security Maze

Al-Shabaab’s Growing Threat and International Response

Alarm Bells Ring Over Al-Shabaab’s Territorial Ambitions in Somalia

A Looming Catastrophe in the Red Sea and the Somaliland Government’s Silence

As events unfold across the globe, the stage is being set for a turbulent conflict that threatens to engulf the Red Sea region and, by extension, Somaliland. The convergence of various geopolitical tensions has ignited speculation of a major conflict involving the Houthis in Yemen, Israel, and the United States on one side, with Iran, Turkey and China as opposing forces. It raises an alarming question: why is the Somaliland government remaining silent while significant threats loom at its doorstep?

Are We Sleepwalking into Destitution? The Looming Catastrophe in the Red Sea and Somaliland’s Dangerous Complacency
As global powers position for conflict, Somaliland’s leadership must confront the realities they cannot afford to ignore.

The Middle East is bracing for unprecedented upheaval. The United States has amassed a staggering military presence in the region, signaling preparations for a confrontation that could ripple across the globe. With Iran issuing aggressive threats against Israel, the potential for conflict escalates daily. Various factions, including the Houthis and terrorist groups aligned with regional powers, are poised to exploit the chaos that could arise from any military misstep. As the international community braces itself, the European Union is proactive, advising its citizens to prepare for emergencies, recommending that every household stock up on essential supplies, as the winds of war approach.

So, amid this frenzy, what is Somaliland’s government doing? Are they aware of the precarious situation they face given their geographical proximity to this brewing storm? The evidence suggests a concerning void in the government’s communication strategies. Citizens are left in the dark about impending dangers while the Somaliland elite seem to be decidedly detached or, perhaps, complicit in orchestrating a narrative that sidelines the urgency of the situation.

Somaliland has long enjoyed friendships with Western powers and the UAE, yet the shifting alliances in the region pose inherent risks. The involvement of Iran, with its support for groups like the Houthis, could have dire consequences for Somaliland should conflict spill over in the absence of a solid government response. Instead of rallying citizens behind a robust plan for preparedness, the government is failing to leverage critical intelligence about the situation, leaving many to speculate on whether they possess any actionable strategy should the situation deteriorate further.

The geopolitical chess game surrounding the Horn of Africa is intensely complex. On one side, you have nations such as the U.S., Israel, and UAE, eager to protect their interests in the face of hostile threats. However, on the other hand, Iran, China and Turkey both view the Red Sea as a strategic gateway crucial for their own ambitions. They have cultivated relationships with local factions, demonstrating a willingness to promote instability as a means of advancing their geopolitical game plans.

EU Prepares for War: Why is Somaliland Left in the Dark About an Imminent Red Sea Conflict?
While Europe issues survival kits and preparations, Somaliland faces silence from its leaders during a time of impending crisis.

And yet, the Somaliland government, which should be at the forefront of these discussions, appears to be oblivious or too complacent. They risk leaving Somaliland’s sovereignty vulnerable as they neglect to disseminate critical information regarding the implications of global conflicts for their constituents. The EU, with its advanced planning for potential disruptions, hinges upon the principle of transparency with its citizens. The knowledge that 450 million Europeans are taking government advice seriously to prepare for emergencies starkly contrasts with the silence coming from Hargeisa.

Silent Threats: Is Somaliland’s Government Ignoring an Impending War at Its Doorstep?
The evidence is mounting, yet the Somaliland government remains silent as chaos looms in the Red Sea region.

Somaliland faces potentially cataclysmic scenarios if the Red Sea descends into chaos. The port of Berbera, a vital artery for trade and economic activity, could become embroiled in the aftermath of regional conflict. The potential influx of refugees, instability, and economic disintegration due to catastrophic military actions could wreak havoc on our society.

If the evidence of escalating tensions across the region was not enough, the patterns of discord that have afflicted Somalia and other neighboring states—Al-Shabaab in the south, ISIS in Puntland, and Ethiopia’s own unresolved conflicts—paint a grim picture of the precarious environment we inhabit.

It is time for Somaliland to wake up and turn its gaze to the darker corners of reality. The government must acknowledge the looming specter of war and inform its citizens of the risks they face. Silence in the face of danger is complicity. The people of Somaliland deserve to hear the truth and be equipped to handle the oncoming storm.