Connect with us

Middle East

Israel to Refrain From Attacking Iran’s Nuclear Sites, Focus on Military Targets, Sources say

Published

on

Israel’s Calculated Response to Iran: A Shift Away from Nuclear Sites Toward Military Targets

As Israel faces heightened tensions in the region, a new military calculus seems to be emerging. Following a report from The New York Times, Israel is expected to refrain from directly targeting Iran’s nuclear facilities in its response to recent missile attacks. Instead, the focus is shifting toward military and intelligence sites within Iran—an indication of the broader strategic priorities guiding the Israeli government’s decisions. This move, while practical, marks a significant departure from decades of Israeli rhetoric centered on neutralizing the existential threat posed by Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

In the aftermath of Iran’s second major missile strike on October 1, which saw over 180 ballistic missiles aimed at Israeli air force bases and other sensitive locations, expectations for an aggressive Israeli counter-strike on Iran’s nuclear infrastructure have risen sharply. However, insiders suggest that this moment may not represent the long-anticipated opportunity to disable Tehran’s nuclear program.

The Goals of War: Why Israel is Taking a Measured Approach

According to sources close to Israel’s security cabinet, the decision to avoid striking Iran’s nuclear facilities is rooted in the wider goals of the ongoing conflict. The most immediate objective is clear: defeating Hamas in Gaza and restoring a sense of security along Israel’s northern border with Lebanon, where Hezbollah remains a constant threat. These aims, critical to Israel’s internal stability, would be jeopardized by an escalation with Iran that could lead to a broader regional conflict—something Israeli leaders are determined to avoid.

The rationale behind this approach is straightforward. Attacking Iran’s nuclear program could provoke a massive response from Tehran, dragging Israel into a full-scale war with one of the Middle East’s most powerful militaries. Such a conflict would not only distract from efforts to subdue Hamas but also potentially ignite Hezbollah and other Iranian proxies into action, compounding the security challenges Israel is already facing on multiple fronts. As one Israeli official pointed out, Iran’s recent missile strike was likely an attempt to “rebalance” its deterrence capabilities following Israel’s successes against Hezbollah and Hamas.

A Changing Strategic Landscape

For years, Israel has prepared for the possibility of taking direct military action against Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, with both Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant framing the elimination of Iran’s nuclear threat as a primary goal of their tenure. However, the complexities of this moment have led to a reassessment of priorities. While Israeli officials continue to emphasize the importance of countering Iran’s ambitions, the immediate focus has shifted toward a broader set of military targets, including ballistic missile and drone facilities, as well as intelligence hubs connected to recent attacks on Israel.

The decision not to target nuclear sites, despite Iran’s recent provocations, represents a recalibration of Israel’s strategic objectives. Some sources suggest that while the opportunity to degrade Iran’s nuclear program is significant, it would not align with the immediate goals of the current war. Instead, Israel’s leadership appears to be concentrating on maintaining regional stability and avoiding a confrontation that could spiral beyond its control.

The Risks of Restraint

This measured approach, however, comes with its own set of risks. Critics argue that Israel may be missing a rare chance to strike a decisive blow against Iran’s nuclear ambitions. Despite the security cabinet’s concerns about a broader conflict, some observers believe that the current moment—a time when Iran has directly attacked Israel twice in six months—may represent a once-in-a-generation opportunity to target its nuclear program. These proponents worry that, by not taking action now, Israel may allow Iran to continue advancing toward the development of a nuclear weapon, increasing the long-term threat to the Jewish state.

In this context, the debate over Israel’s military strategy reflects a deeper tension between short-term security needs and long-term existential concerns. On the one hand, avoiding an all-out war with Iran allows Israel to continue focusing on its immediate conflicts with Hamas and Hezbollah. On the other, the restraint shown by Israeli leaders may leave Tehran emboldened, particularly if its nuclear infrastructure remains untouched.

The Role of the U.S. and Western Allies

Complicating matters further is the question of whether Israel could effectively dismantle Iran’s nuclear program without outside assistance. Many U.S. and Western military experts have long argued that Israel lacks the necessary firepower to destroy Iran’s deeply buried nuclear sites, such as the Fordow facility. Without access to the kind of bunker-busting munitions that only the U.S. possesses, Israel would need to rely on a sustained bombing campaign—an option that carries its own logistical and geopolitical challenges.

Nonetheless, recent Israeli successes in underground warfare—such as the September 27 assassination of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah, which involved dropping 85 bombs to collapse his underground bunker—suggest that a more sustained attack on Iranian nuclear sites could still achieve meaningful results. While Fordow is much deeper underground than Nasrallah’s hideout, some Israeli officials believe that repeated strikes could cause enough damage to significantly slow Iran’s nuclear progress, even if the facilities are not completely destroyed.

What Comes Next for Israel and Iran?

As the situation unfolds, Israel’s restraint may be tested by further provocations from Iran or its regional proxies. The question of whether to escalate the conflict remains a central point of debate among Israeli policymakers, particularly as the international community grapples with the potential fallout from any direct strike on Iran’s nuclear program. While some Western officials continue to urge caution, others support a more aggressive approach, arguing that Iran’s willingness to attack Israel directly—combined with its continued defiance of international nuclear regulations—poses a grave and growing threat.

For now, Israel appears committed to a more cautious strategy, focused on degrading Iran’s military capabilities without triggering a larger regional war. But the underlying tensions between Tehran and Jerusalem show no signs of abating. As the world watches, Israel’s choices in the coming months will have profound implications not only for its own security but for the broader Middle East—and the global order.

The road ahead is fraught with uncertainty, but one thing is clear: the stakes have never been higher. Whether Israel’s decision to refrain from attacking Iran’s nuclear sites proves to be a wise course of action or a missed opportunity will be judged by the outcomes of the conflicts still to come.

Middle East

Hezbollah, Hamas Resilient Despite Heavy Losses, U.S. Counterterrorism Official Says

Published

on

Despite Israel’s ongoing offensives against Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza, neither group has been critically weakened, according to Brett Holmgren, acting director of the U.S. National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC). Speaking in Washington, Holmgren noted that while Israeli intelligence and military strikes have considerably diminished these groups’ abilities to attack Israel, both retain significant assets and influence.

Holmgren highlighted Hezbollah’s substantial resources, including extensive missile stockpiles and well-armed ground forces in southern Lebanon. He acknowledged that Israeli operations have damaged Hezbollah’s leadership but stressed that the group’s “external capabilities” remain mostly unaffected, posing potential threats beyond the Middle East. U.S. officials remain on high alert for indications that Hezbollah could pursue retaliatory attacks abroad.

Hamas, which instigated the recent conflict with its October 7, 2023, attack on Israel, has faced major losses. U.S. assessments indicate the group’s shift toward insurgent-style tactics, including hit-and-run strikes. Yet, Holmgren warned that Hamas’s appeal endures, particularly among disenfranchised youth in Gaza, where viable political alternatives are lacking.

Prior to the attack, U.S. intelligence estimated Hamas’s forces between 20,000 and 30,000, and Hezbollah’s at around 40,000. Israeli estimates suggest they have neutralized about 14,000 Hamas fighters and over 2,500 Hezbollah fighters. Despite Israel’s destruction of around 80% of Hezbollah’s short- and medium-range rockets, the group’s entrenched influence in Lebanon remains substantial.

Concerns are rising that the escalating death toll in Gaza and Lebanon could inspire further extremism. U.S. officials report an uptick in propaganda from groups like ISIS and al-Qaida, which are exploiting the conflict to bolster recruitment. ISIS activities in central Syria and the IS-Khorasan affiliate in Afghanistan continue to pose serious challenges, with the latter benefiting from Taliban control issues.

In Africa, ISIS and al-Qaida affiliates have surged, particularly in the Sahel, where instability has worsened as local governments increasingly turn to Russian security forces. The U.S. warns this trend could become a major long-term threat if left unchecked.

With Hezbollah and Hamas under strain, the U.S. anticipates that Iran may leverage its regional proxies for retaliatory actions against U.S. and Israeli interests. Iran’s support of groups like al-Qaida also remains a key concern, as does Tehran’s influence strategy, which U.S. officials have observed targeting U.S. political dynamics, including the recent election.

Holmgren affirmed the NCTC’s commitment to working with the incoming Trump administration to safeguard U.S. and allied interests against these evolving threats, ensuring a seamless transition for national security operations.

Continue Reading

Middle East

Israel Conducts Deadly Airstrikes in Lebanon

Published

on

Israel launched intense airstrikes across southern Lebanon and the Bekaa Valley on Wednesday, targeting towns where the militant group Hezbollah maintains influence. The strikes, which resulted in dozens of casualties, come amid an ongoing 13-month conflict between Israel and Hezbollah that has claimed more than 3,000 lives in Lebanon alone, with a significant escalation since Israeli ground forces entered southern Lebanon on October 1.

In a prerecorded statement, Hezbollah’s leader, Naim Kassem, issued a stark warning to Israel, vowing to continue the resistance until Israel “seeks to demand an end to the aggression.” Kassem hinted at the potential for indirect negotiations, should Israel halt its operations.

The strikes hit Hezbollah strongholds in Beirut’s southern suburbs and multiple locations in the eastern Baalbek-Hermel governorate. Governor Bachir Khodr, who reported the casualty numbers, said rescue operations continue amid the rubble left by at least 40 Israeli raids. In response, Hezbollah launched rockets at northern and central Israel, with air-raid sirens sounding as far south as Tel Aviv.

The conflict’s repercussions are also being felt in Gaza, where Israeli incursions against Hamas in the north have led to the displacement of over 100,000 civilians, according to U.N. estimates.

UNRWA Faces Scrutiny as Israel Targets Agency’s Role in Gaza

In the United Nations, UNRWA, the U.N. agency dedicated to supporting Palestinian refugees, is facing an existential threat as Israel’s parliament moves to ban its operations in Gaza. Established in 1949, UNRWA plays a central role in the humanitarian aid infrastructure for Palestinians, with a significant presence in Gaza.

UNRWA Commissioner General Philippe Lazzarini issued a plea for international intervention, warning that dismantling the agency would plunge Palestinian territories into deeper chaos. Israeli officials allege UNRWA’s complicity with Hamas and accuse the agency of harboring staff with ties to terrorist activities, though UNRWA maintains that no concrete evidence has been presented.

The proposed Israeli legislation has sparked a backlash from international representatives. General Assembly President Philemon Yang condemned the move, while ambassadors from several states expressed alarm at the precedent this could set for the United Nations’ autonomy.

“The eviction of a U.N. agency by the decision of a single member state would set an alarming precedent,” Belgian Ambassador Philippe Kridelka stated, representing a coalition of 16 countries supporting UNRWA’s role.

Continue Reading

Middle East

Lebanon Searches For Survivors After Israeli Airstrikes Kill 52

Published

on

In northeastern Lebanon, rescue efforts are ongoing after Israeli airstrikes reportedly killed at least 52 people in the Bekaa Valley, as confirmed by Lebanon’s Health Ministry. The strikes, which injured 72 others, prompted mass evacuations, with video footage capturing buildings reduced to rubble and smoke clouding the area. In Beirut’s southern suburb of Dahiyeh, Israeli jets also struck dozens of structures, although no casualties were reported.

The IDF has claimed responsibility for the overnight attacks, stating that intelligence-targeted strikes aimed at Hezbollah’s alleged weapons facilities, central command sites, and infrastructure in southern Lebanon were conducted, reportedly with prior warnings to civilians. The escalation follows recent Hezbollah rocket attacks, which, according to IDF reports, killed seven people in northern Israel. Lebanon’s acting Prime Minister Najib Mikati condemned the strikes as an expansion of Israeli aggression, casting doubt on ceasefire efforts amid ongoing U.S.-led diplomatic interventions.

In Gaza, Israeli strikes on the Nuseirat refugee camp killed over 30 people, adding to a severe humanitarian crisis in the territory. Leaders of major U.N. agencies have described the situation as “apocalyptic,” highlighting the denial of essential humanitarian aid to Gaza’s displaced populations.

Meanwhile, Secretary of State Antony Blinken reiterated the need for Israel to comply with U.N. Security Council Resolution 1701, which mandates Hezbollah’s withdrawal from areas south of the Litani River. Blinken and Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin have also pressed Israel to expedite humanitarian access to Gaza, linking future U.S. military support to these efforts.

The conflicts across Lebanon and Gaza underscore the region’s volatility following Hamas’s deadly October 2023 attack on Israel, which triggered the current escalation. In the intervening weeks, casualties have mounted on both sides, displacing millions and deepening the humanitarian crisis across affected areas.

Continue Reading

Middle East

Middle East Fighting Rages on Several Fronts, Killing Dozens

Published

on

As hostilities intensify across multiple Middle Eastern fronts, casualties continue to mount. Fighting on Thursday claimed lives in Israel, Lebanon, the West Bank, and Gaza. In Israel, five people, including an Israeli farmer and four foreign workers, died when projectiles launched from Lebanon struck northern regions. In response, Israeli forces targeted southern Lebanon, reportedly killing at least eight individuals, among them six health workers.

Amid the escalating regional conflict, U.S. and Israeli officials met to explore a ceasefire with Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza, with both groups receiving military and financial backing from Iran. Talks centered on implementing U.N. Security Council Resolution 1701, which would mandate Hezbollah’s withdrawal from southern Lebanon, a longstanding but largely unfulfilled measure. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu underscored the need for any agreement to secure Israel’s safety, adding that an effective resolution should enforce measures that prevent threats along its northern border.

The situation in Gaza remains dire. Israeli airstrikes have killed at least 46 Palestinians, with further civilian casualties reported in central Gaza’s Nuseirat camp, where a paramedic and two journalists were among 16 killed. In the West Bank, Israeli military actions near the Nur Shams refugee camp claimed three lives. UNRWA, the U.N. agency supporting Palestinian refugees, reported that its local office sustained significant damage from Israeli bulldozers, rendering it unusable.

With U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken confirming “good progress” on advancing understandings around U.N. Resolution 1701, there is guarded optimism for reducing hostilities. However, Hezbollah’s leader, Naim Kassem, indicated continued resistance until agreeable ceasefire terms are met, while Israel demands a return of Hezbollah forces beyond the Litani River and support from the Lebanese army to secure border regions.

Complicating peace efforts, Gaza remains engulfed in violence since the October 7, 2023, Hamas assault on Israel, which killed 1,200 people and saw 250 hostages captured. In response, Israel’s military campaign has led to over 43,100 reported Palestinian deaths, largely civilians, and displaced about 90% of Gaza’s 2.3 million residents. The recent meeting between U.S. President Joe Biden and Cypriot President Nikos Christodoulides highlighted the urgent need for humanitarian aid channels, with Cyprus playing a pivotal role in facilitating assistance to the region.

Continue Reading

Middle East

New Hezbollah Chief Vows Continued Fight With Israel

Published

on

Naim Kassem, recently named Hezbollah’s new leader after Hassan Nasrallah’s reported death in an Israeli airstrike, has affirmed that Hezbollah will persist in fighting Israel until a cease-fire is achieved under terms acceptable to the group. In his first public address since assuming leadership, Kassem stated that Hezbollah would not seek an immediate truce but would consider cessation under specific conditions. This message comes as Israel continues its military operations against Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza, maintaining its stated goal of reducing the groups’ capabilities along its borders.

Israel’s security cabinet is reportedly discussing a potential 60-day truce with Hezbollah, with conditions that include Hezbollah’s retreat north of the Litani River and a Lebanese army presence along the border. An enforcement mechanism involving international intervention is also proposed to uphold the cease-fire. Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant has claimed significant degradation of Hezbollah’s missile capabilities, estimating their resources are now at 20% of previous levels due to sustained military pressure.

Amidst the conflict, U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has voiced concerns about Israeli legislation that would bar the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) from operating in Gaza. He warned of severe humanitarian consequences for Palestinian refugees if the legislation proceeds, emphasizing that it could violate international obligations. Israel’s envoy to the U.N. countered that UNRWA has become a “front for Hamas.”

Meanwhile, international mediators, including U.S. officials Brett McGurk and Amos Hochstein, are en route to the Middle East for discussions aimed at de-escalating tensions in both Lebanon and Gaza. The outcome of these diplomatic efforts remains uncertain as both Israeli and Hezbollah forces intensify their military activities, with the potential for further escalation looming if negotiations do not yield a mutually acceptable truce.

Continue Reading

Middle East

Behind The Scenes of Israeli Attack: Over 100 Aircraft and a 2,000 km Journey to Iran

Published

on

In a large-scale military operation, Israel’s Defense Forces (IDF) executed a calculated aerial assault targeting specific Iranian military sites. Over 100 aircraft, including advanced F-35 “Adir” stealth fighters, undertook the operation, which spanned roughly 2,000 kilometers and concentrated on strategic locations within Iran, notably Tehran and Karaj. In what officials describe as a preemptive, defensive maneuver, the IDF aimed to disable Iranian military capabilities while carefully avoiding nuclear and oil sites, an approach meant to prevent escalation beyond the immediate conflict zone.

According to IDF sources, the operation unfolded in multiple waves. The first wave focused on dismantling radar and air defense installations, laying the groundwork for subsequent attacks on military compounds. This stage-by-stage approach aimed to ensure minimal resistance from Iranian defense systems. The IDF’s tactical preparation included a coordinated strike on Syrian air defenses in the hours leading up to the operation, mitigating the risk of Iranian forces in Syria detecting Israel’s strategy.

Managing a mission of this magnitude required extensive resources, particularly in terms of logistics and fuel. Long-distance operations such as these involve mid-air refueling capabilities, a crucial asset in sustained airborne maneuvers. In addition, Israel’s elite 669 Rescue Unit was placed on high alert to respond to any emergency, underscoring the high-stakes nature of the mission.

Defense Minister Yoav Gallant and Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Herzi Halevi reportedly monitored the operation from the IDF’s headquarters in Tel Aviv, maintaining direct lines of communication with the Security Cabinet, which authorized the strike in a late-night conference call. An IDF spokesperson, Rear Admiral Daniel Hagari, affirmed the IDF’s readiness for both defensive and offensive actions in response to any potential fallout. He added that, while there are currently no changes in public safety guidelines from the Home Front Command, citizens should remain vigilant and await updates.

The strike, according to a senior Israeli official, came in direct response to an October 1 missile attack attributed to Iranian forces, signaling a shift in Israel’s strategic tolerance for perceived Iranian provocations. The White House expressed support, asserting that Israel’s military actions align with its right to self-defense. U.S. officials disclosed that Israel provided advanced notice of the operation, allowing President Biden to remain updated in real time as events unfolded.

As regional tensions simmer, Israel’s military apparatus remains on alert, monitoring possible retaliation from Iran and its regional proxies in Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, and Yemen. The incident reflects an intensified phase in Israeli-Iranian hostilities, highlighting the high-stakes security landscape in the region and the potentially far-reaching implications of these calculated maneuvers.

Continue Reading

Middle East

UN Security Council Members Urge Restraint Between Israel and Iran

Published

on

Amid rising tensions between Israel and Iran, United Nations Security Council members on Monday called for both nations to exercise restraint and avoid further escalation following a series of retaliatory strikes. The appeal came in response to Israel’s airstrikes over the weekend targeting missile facilities in Iran, which Israel claimed were necessary to curb Tehran’s military capabilities.

The Israeli attacks followed a large missile barrage by Iran targeting Israeli sites, marking an escalation as Israel faces hostilities from Iranian-backed proxies like Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon. These tensions, compounded by a deteriorating situation in Gaza and southern Lebanon, have prompted Security Council members to underscore the urgent need for diplomatic restraint. British Ambassador Barbara Woodward emphasized that “no good can come of pouring more fuel on the flames” of a mounting cycle of violence.

Russia, an ally of Iran, joined calls for restraint, with Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia suggesting that Israel’s actions were aimed at “stoking the flames of war,” accusing Israel of intentionally provoking Iran despite Tehran’s stated restraint. Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei addressed the Israeli strikes, urging caution without directly advocating for retaliatory actions.

On the Israeli side, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu defended the airstrikes as proportionate, asserting that they successfully disrupted Iran’s missile production capabilities. Israeli representative Danny Danon reiterated that Israel’s actions were a response to Iran’s provocations, warning that any further aggression would be met with “swift and decisive” repercussions.

The conflict’s regional implications have drawn heightened attention from international stakeholders. U.S. Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield reaffirmed Washington’s support for Israel’s right to self-defense, but warned Tehran against further hostilities, noting potential “severe consequences” if Iran escalates its attacks on Israel or U.S. personnel in the region.

Amid escalating violence, Egypt’s President Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi proposed a two-day ceasefire between Israel and Hamas in Gaza, with terms that include the release of four hostages. The ceasefire plan is the latest diplomatic attempt following extensive U.S. and Qatari-led efforts to secure a break in the conflict, but has yet to receive responses from either Israel or Hamas. Simultaneously, Israeli and Qatari officials are reported to be discussing a broader framework for a Gaza hostage release, with Israel’s Mossad chief meeting his Qatari and U.S. counterparts to negotiate terms for a potential agreement.

The Security Council meeting also addressed Israel’s recent legislative action against the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), the main UN body providing services to Palestinian refugees. Israeli lawmakers passed a bill to prohibit UNRWA operations within 90 days, citing the agency’s alleged links to Hamas operatives. UNRWA, in turn, condemned the legislation as a violation of international obligations, warning that it could set a “dangerous precedent.”

The latest cycle of violence began with an October 7 attack by Hamas on Israeli soil that left 1,200 dead and saw 250 taken hostage. The situation in Gaza remains dire, with the Palestinian health ministry reporting over 43,000 deaths as Israel’s counteroffensive continues. The humanitarian toll underscores the pressing need for a resolution, as the region faces the grim possibility of further violence amid diplomatic calls for peace.

Continue Reading

Middle East

Israel Says Major Assault on Iran ‘Achieved’ Objectives; US Urges Nations to Press Iran to Stop Further Attacks

Published

on

Israel has declared its recent airstrikes on Iranian military targets a success, claiming to have neutralized missile manufacturing sites and aerial defense systems in Iran as part of a broader response to attacks from Tehran and its allies. The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) announced that the operation, following more than a year of escalating hostilities involving Iranian proxies, aimed at neutralizing imminent threats to Israeli citizens. IDF spokesperson Rear Admiral Daniel Hagari stated that all objectives had been met, though the IDF did not release specific evidence. Iran, however, asserted that its defenses intercepted the majority of strikes, limiting damage to military sites, according to Iranian state media.

The U.S. expressed support for Israel’s “targeted and proportional” response while urging Tehran to halt its attacks on Israeli interests. President Biden and Vice President Harris were briefed on the developments, with U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin reiterating the U.S. commitment to Israel’s security. Both Israel and the U.S. underscored their readiness to counter any further escalation from Iran.

Regional leaders reacted with widespread condemnation of the Israeli strikes, citing fears of a broader conflict. Turkey, among others, accused Israel of jeopardizing regional security. The recent escalation follows previous missile and drone attacks from Iran, with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) launching direct strikes on Israeli territory in response to losses among Iranian and allied commanders in Israeli strikes earlier this year.

Observers expect the Israeli airstrikes to mark a shift in Israel’s stance on Iran, indicating a readiness to target Iranian territory directly. Jonathan Conricus, a former IDF spokesperson, suggested that this approach could continue under Israel’s evolving strategy to directly hold the Iranian government accountable. Meanwhile, Iranian state news agency Tasnim signaled Iran’s intention to deliver a “proportionate response” to Israel’s actions.

Iran briefly closed its airspace during the strikes but reopened it later in the morning. As the situation develops, the international community remains watchful, urging restraint to prevent further escalation.

Continue Reading

Most Viewed