Top stories
Somali Refugee Pleads Guilty to Stealing Millions in COVID Fraud Scheme
Sharmarke Issa admits to playing a key role in a $50 million fraud that stole from a federal nutrition program meant to feed children, now facing federal prison and restitution.
Sharmarke Issa, a Somali refugee who once chaired the board of the Minneapolis Public Housing Authority (MPHA), has pled guilty to federal wire fraud charges, admitting his role in a multi-million dollar fraud scheme. The scheme, centered around the Feeding Our Future (FOF) nutrition program, was designed to provide COVID relief funds to feed hungry children. However, instead of going to those in need, millions of dollars were siphoned off through a money-laundering operation in which Issa played a key part.
Issa was responsible for $7.6 million of the total $50 million misappropriated from the FOF nutrition program, according to federal prosecutors. Of that amount, he personally pocketed $3.5 million, which he has now been ordered to repay. Issa laundered these funds through two entities under his control: Minnesota’s Somali Community, a nonprofit, and Wacan Restaurant LLC. He used the stolen money to buy several properties, which he will now forfeit as part of his plea agreement.
This fraud scheme is one of the largest COVID relief-related scandals uncovered by the U.S. Department of Justice. Dozens of individuals, including other Somali immigrants, were indicted in connection to the operation. Issa, a prominent figure within Minneapolis’ Somali community, held a respected position before his criminal activities came to light.
Issa’s admission of guilt has resulted in the dismissal of other charges related to money laundering and wire fraud, though he still faces a federal prison sentence. While the maximum penalty for the charges could have been 20 years, Issa will likely serve between two years and nine months to three years and five months after entering a guilty plea. His sentencing will take into account his acceptance of responsibility and lack of a prior criminal record.
Issa’s downfall began after one of his properties became the subject of a federal investigation in early 2022. This led to his resignation from the MPHA Board in February 2022, and criminal charges followed later that year, alongside 47 other defendants. In June, five Somalis were convicted on charges related to wire fraud, bribery, and money laundering.
Issa’s story is a stark contrast to the promising public image he once held. As the first refugee to chair the MPHA Board of Commissioners, Issa was seen as a role model within the community. Having arrived in the U.S. as a child refugee, he grew up in Minneapolis public housing and eventually became a leading figure in urban planning. His appointment was praised by Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, who described Issa as a “skilled steward” of public housing, emphasizing his lived experience as key to understanding the needs of low-income residents.
This case has shocked both the local Somali community and the broader public, given Issa’s once-celebrated position and his subsequent betrayal of public trust. The fraud not only diverted essential funds from feeding vulnerable children during the pandemic but also raised concerns about how public figures can exploit positions of power for personal gain.
The exposure of such widespread corruption involving high-profile figures like Issa has also drawn attention to the need for tighter oversight in federal relief programs. The Feeding Our Future fraud case is a stark reminder of the potential for abuse in large-scale emergency funding programs, especially when urgent needs bypass usual oversight mechanisms.
Sharmarke Issa’s guilty plea in one of the largest COVID-related fraud cases in U.S. history underscores the critical need for transparency and accountability, particularly in programs aimed at helping society’s most vulnerable. As Issa prepares for sentencing, the broader message is clear: even those once viewed as community leaders can fall into corruption, and the impact of such schemes can be devastating. The restitution, forfeitures, and prison time may serve as a deterrent, but the damage to public trust is far harder to repair.
Top stories
Aden Duale vs. Citizen TV: The Battle Over Identity and Media Ethics
Kenya’s Environment Cabinet Secretary, Aden Duale, has launched a scathing attack on Citizen TV for its reference to Garissa, Wajir, and Mandera counties as the “Somali region.” The media house, owned by Royal Media Services (RMS), made the remark while covering a High Court ruling that annulled the 2019 census results for the three counties due to irregularities.
Duale didn’t mince words, slamming the term as “absurd, irresponsible, discriminatory, and ethnic profiling.” He accused Citizen TV of crossing a dangerous line—not just in journalism, but in national unity. His outrage underscores a deeper tension in Kenyan politics: the delicate balance between ethnic identity and territorial integrity.
For Duale, the “Somali region” label is more than a careless media phrase; it’s a threat to the sovereignty of Kenya’s northeastern counties. He sees it as an extension of the very forces that sought to manipulate the census results—those who view the region as separate rather than integral to Kenya.
But Citizen TV’s phrasing isn’t happening in a vacuum. The historical marginalization of the region and ongoing security concerns have long fueled questions of identity, belonging, and representation. Was this a mere editorial blunder, or does it reflect a deeper bias in how mainstream media portrays northeastern Kenya?
Duale is now demanding a public apology from Citizen TV, pushing the debate beyond census disputes and into the heart of Kenya’s national identity. Is the media fueling dangerous narratives, or is Duale exploiting the issue for political mileage? Either way, this controversy is far from over.
Top stories
Somalia’s Electoral Crisis: Sheikh Sharif and the UN Seek a Way Forward
Sheikh Sharif Sheikh Ahmed is stepping back into the political battlefield. In a high-stakes meeting with UN envoy James Swan, the former Somali president and opposition leader made one thing clear—Somalia’s electoral process is on the brink, and without a credible agreement, the country could plunge into deeper instability.
The meeting comes amid a volatile political climate where deep divisions among Somalia’s political factions threaten to derail any chance of a legitimate vote. The electoral framework remains the core issue, with opposition leaders like Sheikh Sharif demanding transparency and fairness, while the government faces accusations of consolidating power through disputed electoral procedures.
Sheikh Sharif’s message after the meeting was pointed: without consensus, the electoral process will lack legitimacy, and the Somali people will reject it. His call for broader political dialogue signals a push for greater opposition involvement and a more inclusive electoral framework—something that could either stabilize or further polarize Somalia’s fragile democracy.
The UN’s involvement adds pressure on Mogadishu’s leadership. Swan’s presence signals the international community’s concerns over a potential political meltdown if the process remains disputed. With tensions rising, this meeting may be a crucial turning point—either paving the way for a negotiated settlement or exposing the deep fractures that could push Somalia toward another electoral crisis.
Top stories
Russia Extends Lifeline to Somalia with Emergency Aid Commitment
Russia pledges emergency aid to Somalia, reviving Cold War-era ties and positioning itself as a key player in disaster relief efforts.
Russia has pledged urgent humanitarian assistance to Somalia, reinforcing bilateral ties through disaster response collaboration. In high-level talks held in Moscow, Russian Deputy Minister of Civil Protection Dr. Kurynin Roman Viktorovich assured Somali Disaster Management Agency Chairman Mahamud Moalim Abdulle of immediate relief efforts, technical training, and long-term support.
With Somalia grappling with droughts, food shortages, and mass displacement, Moscow’s intervention arrives at a critical moment. Russia will provide essential equipment, enhance emergency preparedness programs, and strengthen Somalia’s disaster response framework. The pledge signifies a revival of historical Somali-Russian cooperation, dating back to the Cold War.
As climate change intensifies Somalia’s crises, international partnerships are key to survival. Russia’s commitment underscores growing geopolitical engagement in the Horn of Africa, positioning Moscow as an alternative ally amid Western-dominated aid networks.
Top stories
Catastrophe Over Washington: No Survivors in Deadly Midair Collision
A devastating midair collision between an American Airlines regional jet and a U.S. military Blackhawk helicopter near Washington, D.C., has left no survivors. The aircraft crashed into the Potomac River late Wednesday, triggering a massive emergency response. Recovery teams have so far retrieved 27 bodies from the plane and one from the helicopter, with strong currents complicating efforts.
Officials confirmed the American Airlines flight carried 64 passengers and crew, while three U.S. Army personnel were aboard the helicopter during a night training mission. U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy called the accident “preventable” but refrained from speculation, leaving the investigation to the National Transportation Safety Board.
Video footage captured the horrifying moment of impact, showing a fireball over the river. Among the victims were several members of the U.S. figure skating community, including Russian world champions Evgenia Shishkova and Vadim Naumov. The Kremlin expressed condolences.
As investigations continue, questions loom over air traffic congestion and possible miscommunication between the aircraft and Reagan National Airport’s control tower. The tragedy is the deadliest U.S. passenger plane crash since 2009.
Top stories
Debate Intensifies Over Trump’s Push to End Birthright Citizenship
Legal challenges mount as the Supreme Court could redefine the 14th Amendment’s scope on citizenship.
Donald Trump’s executive order seeking to end birthright citizenship has ignited legal and constitutional battles that could redefine who qualifies as an American citizen. The U.S. has long followed jus soli, granting citizenship to anyone born on American soil, a principle enshrined in the 14th Amendment since 1868. However, Trump and his supporters argue that the amendment was never meant to apply to the children of non-citizens or undocumented immigrants.
Legal scholars remain deeply divided. Critics assert that the Supreme Court has consistently upheld birthright citizenship, citing the 1898 Wong Kim Ark ruling, which affirmed that all individuals born in the U.S. are citizens, regardless of their parents’ nationality. Others, including Republican lawmakers and conservative legal experts, argue that the amendment’s language—particularly the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof”—implies a more restrictive interpretation.
Trump’s order has already been temporarily blocked by a federal judge in Seattle, calling it “blatantly unconstitutional.” Meanwhile, 22 Democratic-led states have filed lawsuits, arguing that only Congress, not the president, can amend citizenship laws. If the case reaches the Supreme Court, its ruling could have far-reaching implications, especially with questions surrounding retroactive application—whether it could strip citizenship from those already born in the U.S. to non-citizen parents.
While legal experts anticipate the Supreme Court will uphold birthright citizenship, Trump’s move has revived long-standing debates over immigration, national identity, and constitutional interpretation. The final outcome may not just shape U.S. immigration policy, but fundamentally redefine what it means to be an American citizen.
Top stories
How Vladimir Putin Shattered the EU’s Frugal Coalition
Russia’s aggression and shifting geopolitics push Europe’s austerity hawks toward spending on defense and sovereignty.
For years, the EU’s frugal coalition—led by Germany, Austria, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, and the Netherlands—held a firm grip on the bloc’s finances, opposing joint debt and large-scale spending. However, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, alongside rising geopolitical tensions, has forced these nations to reconsider their fiscal orthodoxy.
Denmark, once a staunch advocate of austerity, has notably shifted its stance under Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen. Her recent call for increased defense spending and support for EU sovereignty marks a break from Denmark’s traditionally cautious approach to deeper EU integration. Frederiksen’s evolving position, analysts say, could enable her to act as a bridge between spending hawks and proponents of a more expansive EU budget.
Countries like Finland and Estonia, facing direct security threats from Russia, now back joint EU debt for defense spending—a notion previously unthinkable for the frugals. Yet divisions persist, with Germany and the Netherlands still resisting collective debt for defense. Austria’s stance may harden further if its far-right leader Herbert Kickl, who maintains ties with Russia, gains power.
Despite cracks in the coalition, the frugals remain united on certain fronts, such as linking EU funds to economic reforms in lower-income regions. However, security-focused Eastern European countries, led by Poland, are increasingly vocal in demanding a budget shift toward defense and resilience.
The future of the frugal coalition hinges on Germany. If Berlin, under a potential CDU-led government, maintains its opposition to higher spending, the coalition may endure. But a shift in Germany’s position could realign the EU’s fiscal dynamics, prompting even its most frugal allies to adapt to the new geopolitical reality.
Putin’s aggression has fundamentally altered the EU’s priorities, testing the cohesion of its traditionally frugal bloc. As defense and sovereignty become paramount, Europe’s fiscal orthodoxy may be on the brink of transformation.
Top stories
Nearly 140 Dolphins Wash Ashore in Somalia’s Puntland Region
Authorities launch an urgent investigation into the mysterious stranding along the coastline, raising concerns over environmental and human factors.
Nearly 140 dolphins washed ashore between Bosaso and Mareero towns in Somalia’s Puntland region has raised alarms among local residents and authorities. Many of the dolphins were already dead, while others were in critical condition when found on Thursday.
The Puntland Ministry of Environment and Climate Change, in collaboration with the Ministry of Fisheries, has launched an urgent investigation into the incident. In a public statement, the regional government urged residents to refrain from consuming the dead dolphins while authorities work to determine the cause of this unusual event.
Residents near the affected coastline have raised suspicions of chemical waste dumping, which has been a longstanding issue in Somalia. Reports of hazardous containers washing ashore date back to the early 1990s during the civil war. These waste dumps, often from foreign entities, have had severe ecological consequences, raising the possibility that toxins may have contaminated the dolphins’ habitat.
Somalia’s coast has been a hotspot for illegal waste dumping, including radioactive materials and industrial chemicals. Such practices have led to long-term environmental damage, with frequent reports of mysterious die-offs of marine life. If confirmed, chemical dumping could further highlight the lack of enforcement mechanisms and international accountability in protecting Somalia’s marine ecosystem.
The Puntland authorities have pledged to conduct a comprehensive investigation, involving marine scientists and environmental experts, to determine the precise cause of the incident. They have also emphasized the importance of addressing broader issues of marine pollution and illegal waste dumping, which have long plagued the region.
The mass stranding of dolphins along Somalia’s Puntland coast serves as a grim reminder of the fragile balance of marine ecosystems and the far-reaching consequences of environmental neglect. As investigations unfold, the incident underscores the urgent need for stronger environmental protections and international collaboration to safeguard marine life in Somalia and beyond.
Top stories
Russian Spy Ship Re-Enters UK Waters as Tensions Rise
British Navy ramps up surveillance after Russian vessel “Yantar” is spotted near critical undersea infrastructure for the second time.
The British Navy has intensified efforts to protect its waters and critical infrastructure after the Russian spy vessel Yantar was spotted traversing the English Channel for the second time in recent weeks. The Ministry of Defence (MoD) confirmed that HMS Somerset closely monitored the ship’s movements as it passed through the Channel.
A Repeat Encounter
This marks the second incursion by the Yantar into UK waters since November, when the ship was accused of “loitering” near undersea infrastructure critical to national security. After receiving a warning from a British submarine during its first visit, the vessel departed for the Mediterranean, only to return this week.
The presence of the Yantar has raised serious concerns in the UK, especially as Russia faces mounting accusations of sabotage and espionage in international waters. Recent incidents, such as damage to the Estlink2 undersea cable between Estonia and Finland in December, have heightened fears of Russian interference in Europe’s critical maritime infrastructure.
The UK’s efforts align with broader NATO initiatives to address Russia’s growing maritime activity. The alliance has intensified surveillance across critical maritime routes and infrastructure to prevent further incidents. NATO allies, including the Baltic states and Finland, are particularly concerned about the potential for sabotage as Russia seeks to destabilize Europe amid its ongoing war in Ukraine.
Kremlin’s Response
Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov declined to comment on the UK’s accusations, stating during a press briefing, “I am not really familiar with the subject.” Russia has yet to issue an official explanation for the Yantar’s presence in UK waters.
The Broader Context
As the war in Ukraine continues, Russia’s covert maritime activities have come under increased scrutiny. Western nations view such actions as part of a broader strategy to undermine NATO unity and disrupt vital infrastructure. The UK’s decisive measures highlight the seriousness of these threats and its commitment to safeguarding national and regional security.
The reappearance of the Yantar in British waters underscores the escalating geopolitical tensions in Europe, with the English Channel emerging as a focal point in the struggle between NATO allies and Russia. Britain’s response serves as a warning that further incursions will not go unanswered.
-
Africa10 months ago
How Somaliland Could Lead the Global Camel Milk Industry
-
Somaliland2 days ago
Somaliland and UAE Elevate Ties to Comprehensive Strategic Partnership
-
Analysis10 months ago
Iran escalates conflict, attacking Israel; US forces help Israel to intercept Iranian projectiles
-
Analysis10 months ago
Israel and Iran on Edge: Tensions Escalate Amidst Rising Threats
-
Top stories8 months ago
Gunmen Kill 11 in Southeastern Nigeria Attack, Army Reports
-
Analysis9 months ago
Facts in the Trump Courtroom vs. ‘Facts’ in the Court of Public Opinion
-
Top stories9 months ago
Trump’s Comparisons: Charlottesville Rally and Israel Protests
-
Crime10 months ago
Somali USA Gangs: Deadly Twist in Shocking St. Paul Shooting