Somaliland
A New U.S.–Somaliland Mining Partnership
A Rare Opportunity in the Horn of Africa
Introduction:
The world’s appetite for critical minerals is soaring. Metals like lithium, cobalt, and rare earth elements (REEs) form the backbone of modern technologies and clean energy – and demand is projected to explode (lithium demand alone could increase tenfold by 2050) (The strategies driving the players in competition for Africa’s critical minerals – Atlantic Council). Yet today, China dominates the supply chain, controlling about 60% of critical mineral production and 85% of processing globally (The strategies driving the players in competition for Africa’s critical minerals – Atlantic Council). This near-monopoly poses a strategic vulnerability for the United States. To secure its industrial future and national security, America must diversify its sources of these vital materials. An unlikely ally in this quest lies in the Horn of Africa: Somaliland – a stable, self-governing democracy with untapped mineral riches and a pro-Western orientation.
Somaliland, though not internationally recognized, has quietly emerged as a potential treasure trove of critical minerals. Recent explorations indicate significant deposits of rare earth elements, lithium, and other strategic metals under its soil. Tapping these resources via U.S. partnerships would not only bolster America’s supply chains but also strengthen a friendly government in a geostrategic location. This report makes the case – in strategic, economic, and geopolitical terms – for why American policymakers and investors should forge U.S.–Somaliland mining partnerships focused on critical minerals. By doing so, the U.S. can reduce dependence on China, enhance national security, and foster development in Somaliland, to mutual benefit.
Somaliland’s Untapped Critical Mineral Riches
Somaliland’s geology is highly prospective yet under-explored. The territory is known to host a wide array of minerals, from precious metals to industrial ores. Official surveys list gold, copper, nickel, platinum, tin, and coltan (tantalite) among the promising targets (Mining). There are also encouraging signs of battery metals: a United Nations geochemical survey found anomalous traces of lithium, and local experts believe cobalt could be present alongside copper and nickel deposits (Mining). Notably, rare earth elements (REEs) – the group of 17 metals essential for electronics and defense – are thought to exist in “huge” quantities in Somalia/Somaliland (Minerals of Somalia – Page 8 – Mereja.Forum). Some sources even claim Somalia (which Somaliland broke away from in 1991) holds Africa’s largest known nickel reserves (Minerals of Somalia – Page 8 – Mereja.Forum), hinting at world-class potential if properly explored.
For decades, these mineral riches remained locked in the ground due to Somaliland’s isolation and lack of recognition. But signs of change have emerged recently. In June 2024, Somaliland inked a deal with Saudi mining firm Kilomass to explore lithium – a landmark foreign investment in its mining sector (Saudi Mining Company Kilomass Secures Lithium Exploration Deal in Somaliland – Somaliland Chronicle). Lithium, used in batteries, is one of the world’s most sought-after resources. Kilomass’s entry underscores that Somaliland’s lithium deposits are considered significant and potentially lucrative on the global market. Indeed, Somaliland’s Ministry of Energy and Minerals has indicated that lithium is present and attracting international attention (Saudi Mining Company Kilomass Secures Lithium Exploration Deal in Somaliland – Somaliland Chronicle).
American and allied interests have taken notice. U.S. Congressman Chris Smith recently highlighted Somaliland’s strategic mineral wealth during a congressional hearing, noting that “significant lithium deposits [were] recently discovered in Somaliland” and that a Taiwanese firm is keen to invest (#congressman #dfc #sustainableenergy #lithiumproject #sustainableenergy… | Orina Chang 張綺真). This is a crucial development: Taiwan (a U.S. partner) formed a mining cooperation agreement with Somaliland in 2022 (Taiwan signs the Energy and Mineral Resources Cooperation Agreement with Somaliland – Somaliland Chronicle), and Taiwanese companies are now among those pursuing Somaliland’s minerals. In fact, Taiwan’s state-owned CPC Corp. has already taken a 49% stake in an oil exploration block in Somaliland (Taiwan signs the Energy and Mineral Resources Cooperation Agreement with Somaliland – Somaliland Chronicle), and is reportedly eyeing the mining sector next. Taipei’s involvement signals both confidence in Somaliland and a shared interest in countering China’s resource dominance.
Somaliland’s government is eager to capitalize on this momentum. It has issued new exploration licenses and promoted its mining potential in recent years (Mining). The country remains, in its own words, “highly prospective yet very underexplored” (Mining). This means low-hanging fruit: large swathes of terrain have never been systematically surveyed with modern techniques, so the odds of additional finds (from rare earth oxides to lithium-bearing pegmatites) are high. For American investors, Somaliland represents a ground-floor opportunity to discover and develop critical mineral sources that could rival those in better-known locales. The next big rare earth or lithium find might well be made in Somaliland – and early partners will reap the rewards.
Geopolitical Edge: Diversifying Away from China
Beyond the raw mineral potential, Somaliland offers a compelling geopolitical advantage: partnering here helps bypass China-centric supply chains. Today, Beijing has leveraged its financial clout in Africa to lock down huge swathes of minerals – from cobalt in Congo to graphite in Mozambique (The strategies driving the players in competition for Africa’s critical minerals – Atlantic Council). It has also built refining capacity such that even non-Chinese mines often must send ore to China for processing. The result is a fragile reliance: China could squeeze global tech industries by restricting exports (as it has hinted with rare earths (China imposes new export restrictions on rare earths, escalates …)), or use its dominance as diplomatic leverage.
Somaliland, however, sits outside China’s umbrella. The Somaliland government has forged close ties with Taiwan, implicitly positioning itself against the Chinese Communist Party’s influence. Unlike many African states, it has received no Chinese Belt and Road funds (Somaliland’s key port development is backed by the UAE, not China). In fact, Chinese officials have largely shunned Somaliland due to its Taiwan relationship. This means U.S. investors in Somaliland would face far less Chinese competition or interference compared to elsewhere on the continent.
(The US State Department Puts China First on Rare Earth Metals | Saxafi Media)According to policy analysts, by ignoring Somaliland in the past the West effectively “allowed China to monopolize rare earth metals crucial for modern tech.” Beijing is certainly aware of Somaliland’s mineral potential – Somaliland officials say Chinese companies have aggressively sought mining concessions in the region (The State Department Puts China First on Rare Earth Metals). There are even reports that Chinese actors have tried to incite instability (such as stoking conflict in Somaliland’s Sool region) to scare off rival investors and keep these resources inaccessible (The US State Department Puts China First on Rare Earth Metals | Saxafi Media). All of this underlines a simple point: Somaliland is a strategic prize in the critical minerals race. If the U.S. doesn’t step up, China or other players will fill the void.
For American policymakers, supporting Somaliland’s mining industry serves multiple aims. First, it secures alternative supply: every ton of rare earth or lithium sourced from Somaliland is one less ton sourced from China or Chinese-controlled channels. This directly strengthens U.S. economic security and defense readiness, given these minerals’ use in everything from fighter jet avionics to electric vehicle batteries. As an example, the Pentagon has struggled with 100% reliance on Chinese rare earth magnets for precision-guided munitions; a Somaliland supply could be a future remedy. Second, a U.S.–Somaliland partnership would demonstrate a counter-model to China’s approach. Rather than exploitative contracts that leave African nations deep in debt (a hallmark of some Beijing deals), the U.S. can offer equitable investment that develops local capacity. Somaliland, with its pro-democracy values and pro-Western leanings, is an ideal place to showcase this difference.
Finally, there is a grand-strategic angle: anchoring a friendly, democratic Somaliland firmly in the U.S. camp. Somaliland sits at the mouth of the Red Sea, adjacent to one of the world’s busiest shipping lanes. A strong U.S. commercial presence there – via mining ventures and related infrastructure – complements America’s security interests (neighboring Djibouti already hosts a U.S. military base; Somaliland’s port of Berbera could be an additional logistics hub in the future (Somalia Offers US Control Over Strategic Ports to Block Somaliland Recognition) (Somalia Offers US Control Over Strategic Ports to Block Somaliland Recognition)). It also denies that foothold to America’s rivals. By investing in Somaliland, Washington would deepen a relationship that Beijing cannot easily counter, given China’s refusal to recognize Somaliland and Somaliland’s distrust of Chinese intentions. In essence, critical minerals cooperation could be the cornerstone of a broader strategic partnership with Somaliland, solidifying an outpost of pro-American stability in the Horn of Africa.
A Stable Frontier for Investment: Somaliland’s Governance & Security
From an investor’s standpoint, Somaliland offers surprising stability in a volatile region. While Somalia to its south remains plagued by Al-Shabaab terrorism and political chaos, Somaliland has enjoyed peace and self-governance for over 30 years. It has held multiple democratic elections, established a functioning legal system, and maintains its own security forces. For American companies used to operating in high-risk African environments, Somaliland might prove refreshingly orderly. The rule of law is stronger here than in many recognized African states: contracts with the Somaliland government (such as the DP World port deal) have been honored and enforced domestically.
Somaliland’s legal framework for mining is a work in progress but improving. The Ministry of Energy and Minerals issues licenses for prospecting and mining, and in recent years it has introduced production-sharing agreements for small-scale mining to formalize the sector (Mining – Wasaaradda Tamarta iyo Macdanta) (Mining – Wasaaradda Tamarta iyo Macdanta). As with any frontier market, due diligence is key – the government has admittedly had mishaps with dubious “investors” in the past (Saudi Mining Company Kilomass Secures Lithium Exploration Deal in Somaliland – Somaliland Chronicle). But lessons have been learned; officials are implementing better oversight to vet partners. Crucially, Somaliland’s leaders are highly motivated to make foreign investments work – their quest for international recognition incentivizes them to uphold agreements and build a positive track record. In practical terms, a U.S. mining venture in Somaliland would likely receive red-carpet treatment and robust political support from the host government.
Security, while always a concern, is relatively robust in Somaliland’s main regions. The capital Hargeisa and the vital Berbera corridor are firmly under government control and have seen virtually no terrorist attacks in over a decade. The Somaliland Army and police provide site security for existing foreign operations (e.g. guarding oil exploration crews). U.S. officials have quietly noted Somaliland’s strong counterterror performance in a tough neighborhood (Somalia Offers US Control Over Strategic Ports to Block Somaliland Recognition) (Somalia Offers US Control Over Strategic Ports to Block Somaliland Recognition). One localized conflict did erupt recently in the eastern city of Las Anod, where clan militias (reportedly with external meddling) challenged Somaliland’s authority. However, that fighting is hundreds of kilometers away from the western regions likely to host mining operations (where known mineral prospects like lithium-bearing rocks are found in Gabiley and Sahil regions). It is also an outlier in an otherwise stable polity. By and large, Somaliland has avoided the resource-fueled conflicts that beset places like eastern Congo. There are no rebel armies or militant insurgencies controlling mining areas – a critical distinction that de-risks any project.
The remaining challenges are more logistical: building some local capacity, and navigating the lack of international banking links (since Somaliland isn’t formally recognized, international banks approach it cautiously). However, creative solutions exist – for instance, using regional banking hubs or local subsidiaries. The U.S. government can also mitigate these issues through political support (more on that below). In sum, Somaliland presents a governance environment conducive to responsible mining: a democratic ethos, reasonable security, and a government eager to enforce norms if it means attracting reputable investors. For American companies worried about resource nationalism or contract breaches, Somaliland’s record so far is reassuring.
The Berbera Advantage: World-Class Port and Logistics
(Somalia Offers US Control Over Strategic Ports to Block Somaliland Recognition) Strategic Infrastructure: One of Somaliland’s strongest assets is the Port of Berbera, a deep-water port on the Gulf of Aden that offers a direct outlet for exports to Middle Eastern, European, and Asian markets. In partnership with Dubai’s DP World, Somaliland has transformed Berbera into a modern logistics hub. A brand-new container terminal opened in 2021, increasing the port’s capacity to 500,000 TEU per year and capable of servicing some of the largest ships in the world (DP World and Somaliland open new terminal at Berbera Port, announce second phase expansion and break ground for Economic Zone – India Shipping News). DP World has committed $442 million to further expand Berbera – extending the quay to 1,000 meters and adding state-of-the-art cranes, which will boost throughput up to 2 million TEUs annually in a second phase (DP World and Somaliland open new terminal at Berbera Port, announce second phase expansion and break ground for Economic Zone – India Shipping News). Alongside the port, a Berbera Free Economic Zone is being developed to house manufacturing and processing ventures (DP World and Somaliland open new terminal at Berbera Port, announce second phase expansion and break ground for Economic Zone – India Shipping News).
For mining operations, this infrastructure is pure gold. Somaliland’s minerals can be efficiently trucked to port and shipped worldwide without transiting a third country. This is a huge logistical advantage over landlocked mining regions elsewhere in Africa. An expanded Berbera Port means even large volumes of heavy ore or concentrate can be loaded quickly onto vessels. Additionally, the Berbera Corridor – a newly paved highway from Berbera to the Ethiopian border – is nearing completion, funded by the UK and UAE (DP World and Somaliland open new terminal at Berbera Port, announce second phase expansion and break ground for Economic Zone – India Shipping News). This corridor not only opens Somaliland’s interior and neighboring Ethiopia for trade, but it ensures that mining sites in Somaliland’s interior have a reliable road to the coast. By the end of 2022, the main highway and an alternate bypass around Hargeisa were largely finished (DP World and Somaliland open new terminal at Berbera Port, announce second phase expansion and break ground for Economic Zone – India Shipping News). In practical terms, a mining company could move equipment from ship to mine, or minerals from mine to ship, with relative ease and predictability.
Berbera’s strategic location adds further value. It sits just 8 days sailing from the Suez Canal, considerably closer to European markets than ports in South Africa or even Tanzania. It also provides a straight shot across the Indian Ocean to supply East Asia. For the U.S., utilizing Berbera could shorten supply lines for critical mineral imports. Moreover, as a redundant node in global shipping, Berbera diversifies routes away from chokepoints that might be influenced by China. The port is already drawing interest as an alternative to Djibouti for regional trade (Berbera Port Being Slated As An Alternative To Djibouti For East African Trade | Saxafi Media) (Berbera Port Being Slated As An Alternative To Djibouti For East African Trade | Saxafi Media). As it scales up, Berbera could handle specialized cargo like mineral concentrates or rare earth oxides with dedicated facilities. The Somaliland government has indicated interest in establishing on-site mineral processing (e.g., concentrate plants) in the Berbera free zone, which would add value before export and create local jobs.
There’s also a national security kicker: Berbera used to host U.S. military facilities during the Cold War and has an adjacent airfield with one of Africa’s longest runways. Somaliland has openly offered the U.S. access to Berbera in exchange for closer ties (Somalia Offers US Control Over Strategic Ports to Block Somaliland Recognition). While this report’s focus is economic, policymakers should note that a mining partnership could dovetail with logistical use of Berbera for U.S. forces. For example, equipment and material for mining projects could share infrastructure with any future U.S. military presence, reducing costs. Even absent a formal base, having U.S. companies active in Berbera increases American influence over a port that is strategically situated on the Red Sea (a waterway China also patrols from its base in Djibouti). Simply put, Berbera is a jewel of a port – and any mining venture in Somaliland can leverage it to great effect. The U.S. should see Somaliland’s logistics not as a hurdle, but as a major selling point that can expedite development and export of critical minerals swiftly to global markets.
U.S. Government Tools to Support a Strategic Partnership
Launching a successful U.S.–Somaliland mining partnership will require more than just private-sector interest; U.S. government support can be the catalyst to overcome initial barriers. Fortunately, Washington has several instruments ready for deployment:
- Development Finance Corporation (DFC): The U.S. DFC is empowered to fund projects in developing regions that advance U.S. interests. Backing critical minerals certainly qualifies. DFC can provide political risk insurance, debt financing, or equity investment to companies investing in Somaliland’s mining. This kind of support sends a strong signal – essentially underwriting the risk of the unrecognized status. Notably, DFC has already shown interest: in 2023, a private entrepreneur thanked Congressman Chris Smith and DFC for “backing the lithium project [she is] undertaking in Somaliland,” following a congressional hearing (#congressman #dfc #sustainableenergy #lithiumproject #sustainableenergy… | Orina Chang 張綺真). While details are sparse, this suggests DFC is exploring ways to facilitate a Somaliland lithium venture, potentially in coordination with Taiwan’s own development finance institution (#congressman #dfc #sustainableenergy #lithiumproject #sustainableenergy… | Orina Chang 張綺真). Going forward, the DFC should formally prioritize Somaliland as a target country for critical mineral projects. Even a modest $50-$100 million loan or guarantee could be game-changing in attracting larger private investments.
- Export-Import Bank (EXIM): EXIM Bank can be leveraged to equip Somaliland’s mining industry with American-made machinery and services. For example, if a U.S. contractor is building a mine or a processing plant, EXIM can insure the receivables or extend credit, making it easier for Somaliland’s government or local partners to afford top-tier U.S. equipment. This has a dual benefit: it secures a sale for U.S. exporters (creating jobs at home) and ensures the project uses high-quality tech, increasing its chances of success. EXIM could also offer loan guarantees for offtake agreements – say, guaranteeing payment for a certain volume of rare earth concentrate purchased by a U.S. magnet manufacturer from Somaliland. Such mechanisms reduce market risk. Given Somaliland’s small economy, early projects might need creative financing; EXIM’s involvement would show that the U.S. stands behind the venture, unlocking capital from commercial banks that might otherwise hesitate.
- Department of Defense (DOD) and Strategic Stockpiles: The Pentagon has a keen interest in secure supplies of minerals like rare earths, cobalt, and lithium, which are critical for jets, drones, satellites, and batteries for military use (The US State Department Puts China First on Rare Earth Metals | Saxafi Media). Under the Defense Production Act and related authorities, DOD can directly invest in mining or refining projects deemed vital to national security. Already, the DOD has funded rare earth processing facilities in the U.S. and allied countries. It could extend similar support to Somaliland’s value chain. For instance, DOD might fund a feasibility study for a rare earth separation plant in Somaliland or agree to stockpile a certain amount of Somaliland-sourced minerals annually. By becoming an early buyer (through the U.S. National Defense Stockpile), DOD would provide guaranteed demand, which in turn makes investors more comfortable with financing a mine. Additionally, DOD’s logistical expertise could assist in safely transporting high-value mineral shipments from Somaliland to the U.S. or allied processing facilities, perhaps using secure channels if needed. All of this would be justified by the imperative to diversify away from Chinese-controlled sources – a message that resonates strongly in Congress.
- Diplomatic and Technical Support: While not a financing tool per se, U.S. diplomacy can smooth the path for Somaliland’s integration into global markets. The State Department can negotiate understandings with neighboring countries (and with Somalia’s federal government in Mogadishu, which contests Somaliland’s status) to respect Somaliland’s economic autonomy in mining. This would help prevent any legal challenges or interference. On the technical side, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) could be dispatched to conduct joint surveys and training. USGS has done this successfully in other countries, mapping resources and publishing data that encourages investment. A USGS-led critical minerals survey in Somaliland – perhaps funded by USAID – would provide an independent validation of Somaliland’s resource estimates and could discover new mineralization zones. Such an initiative could be part of a wider capacity-building program: training Somaliland geologists, environmental regulators, and mine safety inspectors to ensure that as mining ramps up, it meets international best practices. This proactive approach would help avert issues of mismanagement and align with the U.S. emphasis on responsible sourcing (no child labor, conflict-free minerals, etc.).
In combination, these tools form a whole-of-government backing for U.S. miners and investors willing to venture into Somaliland. Policymakers should treat Somaliland’s critical minerals initiative as a pilot project for the DFC-EXIM-DoD cooperation that has been envisioned in recent strategy documents about securing supply chains. By coordinating their support, these agencies can dramatically reduce the perceived risk and upfront costs. It’s worth noting that Somaliland’s officials have explicitly courted such U.S. support – the Foreign Minister has met members of Congress to pitch opportunities (Orina Chang 張綺真 on LinkedIn: #congressman #dfc …). The door is open for Washington to walk through with a package that might include, for example: a DFC loan, an EXIM guarantee, a DoD offtake agreement, and a USGS survey team on the ground. That kind of comprehensive backing would virtually ensure that one or more major U.S. companies decide to jump in.
Roadmap: From Talk to Action – Initiating Bilateral Mining Cooperation
How can the U.S. and Somaliland move from goodwill to concrete projects? Below are recommended steps to initiate mining partnerships and the incentives to make them a success:
- Sign a Critical Minerals Memorandum of Understanding (MOU): The U.S. government (through the State Department or Department of Commerce) should negotiate an official MOU with Somaliland focused on mining cooperation. This would be similar to the Taiwan-Somaliland agreement of 2022 (Taiwan signs the Energy and Mineral Resources Cooperation Agreement with Somaliland – Somaliland Chronicle), establishing a joint working group on energy and mineral resources. An MOU, even if not a formal treaty, gives political cover to U.S. agencies to engage with Somaliland’s ministries directly. It can outline commitments such as information-sharing, facilitation of visas for experts, and a roadmap for progressing specific projects (e.g. identifying priority mineral targets and funding pre-feasibility studies). Essentially, it acknowledges Somaliland as a legitimate partner for the U.S. in this domain, which is a big psychological (and diplomatic) boost.
- Open a U.S. Presence in Hargeisa: To reassure investors and coordinate efforts, the U.S. should establish at least a small commercial or liaison office in Somaliland’s capital. In early 2023, a U.S. House subcommittee even called for a representative office in Hargeisa (Somalia Offers US Control Over Strategic Ports to Block Somaliland Recognition). This office, staffed perhaps by USAID or Commerce officials, would help American businesses navigate local regulations and liaise with Somaliland authorities daily. It would also signal to the world that the U.S. is “present” in Somaliland (short of full embassy recognition). For investors, knowing that U.S. officials are on the ground to troubleshoot issues (from customs clearance to contract disputes) greatly increases confidence. Somaliland has indicated it would welcome a U.S. office wholeheartedly. This step can be done relatively quickly and at low cost, and would pay dividends in smoother operations for any partnership.
- Extend Trade Preferences and Legal Clarity: The U.S. should treat Somaliland-origin minerals as eligible for any applicable trade benefits. For instance, if rare earth oxides or processed lithium from Somaliland are imported to the U.S., they should enter with minimal tariffs under programs like the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA). (Somaliland is not a separate AGOA beneficiary currently, but the U.S. could administratively allow imports as “Somalia” origin to qualify, or explicitly add a special line for Somaliland). Additionally, the U.S. Treasury and Commerce departments should issue guidance to banks and businesses clarifying that doing business in Somaliland does not violate U.S. laws or sanctions. One hurdle today is uncertainty: companies aren’t sure if engaging Somaliland might upset relations with Somalia’s recognized government. A quiet understanding or public statement from the State Department that the U.S. supports direct economic engagement with Somaliland in the critical minerals sector would remove that ambiguity. In short, make it legally and financially straightforward to transact with Somaliland entities.
- Incentivize Somaliland with Development and Security Aid: To solidify the partnership, the U.S. can offer Somaliland a package of development projects and security cooperation tied to mining progress. For example, the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) could be encouraged to consider Somaliland for a threshold program focusing on infrastructure (perhaps upgrading roads from mining areas to Berbera). On the security side, the U.S. Africa Command could expand training for Somaliland’s coast guard and police, specifically to help them build capacity to protect port facilities and mining sites. If Somaliland sees tangible benefits on multiple fronts – not just extraction of its minerals – it will deepen cooperation. One imaginative incentive: Somaliland has sought international recognition for decades; while the U.S. may not grant that outright, it could enhance Somaliland’s international stature by inviting it to observe regional initiatives or including its officials in technical training programs alongside recognized states. Such gestures, tied to good performance on mining governance, would encourage Somaliland to uphold high standards. The carrot for Somaliland’s leaders is clear: with U.S. support, their country could see jobs, revenue, and perhaps a step closer to the global acceptance they crave.
- Secure Offtake Agreements and Stockpile Commitments: As a final step to get a mining project off the ground, U.S. entities (private or public) should lock in offtake agreements – contracts to buy Somaliland’s mineral output. For instance, a U.S. battery manufacturer could agree to purchase X tons of Somaliland lithium per year once produced. The U.S. government can facilitate these introductions. Additionally, as mentioned, the U.S. National Defense Stockpile could commit to purchase and store a certain amount of rare earth or cobalt from Somaliland. These agreements guarantee a market for Somaliland’s exports, making it much easier to finance the mines. They also fast-track the integration of Somaliland’s minerals into U.S. supply chains upon production. The goal is that by the time a mine is built, the sale of its first 5–10 years of output is already arranged with reliable buyers (ideally American or allied). This greatly reduces commercial risk.
If these steps are pursued in parallel, we could envision within 2-3 years the launch of a flagship U.S.–Somaliland mining venture – perhaps a lithium mining and processing project in partnership with a Somaliland company and Taiwanese technical advisors, financed by DFC and supplied with Caterpillar (U.S.) equipment via EXIM. In return, the lithium hydroxide produced could be sold to U.S. battery factories, with a portion reserved for the DOD. Meanwhile, Somaliland would receive lease payments, royalties, jobs for its people, and ancillary investments in roads and schools around the mining area. That template, once proven, could be replicated for rare earth elements or other minerals in Somaliland’s resource portfolio.
It’s important to highlight Somaliland’s own responsibilities in this roadmap. The government will need to continue improving the business climate – implementing transparent regulations, ensuring community consent and benefit-sharing in mining areas, and combating corruption. Case studies from Botswana’s diamond industry and Mongolia’s copper mines show that a stable policy environment is key to sustaining investment (Saudi Mining Company Kilomass Secures Lithium Exploration Deal in Somaliland – Somaliland Chronicle) (Saudi Mining Company Kilomass Secures Lithium Exploration Deal in Somaliland – Somaliland Chronicle). Somaliland should be encouraged to adopt best practices like publishing all mining contracts, adhering to the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) standards, and dedicating a portion of mining revenues to local development in mining regions. If Somaliland demonstrates such good governance, it will strengthen the argument in Washington that supporting this “breakaway” state is a worthy and values-driven endeavor.
Conclusion: Security, Prosperity, and a ‘Win-Win’ Future
In the high-stakes arena of critical minerals, Somaliland presents a rare opening for the United States to advance its interests on multiple fronts. By investing in Somaliland’s mining potential, the U.S. can secure new supply chains for vital resources, undercut China’s monopoly, and uplift a small democracy that aligns with American values. This is the kind of strategic, win-win partnership that is too often missing in international development. Somaliland’s leaders often refer to their land as “Treasury Island” – a store of hidden wealth waiting to be unlocked (Taiwan signs the Energy and Mineral Resources Cooperation Agreement with Somaliland – Somaliland Chronicle). With American engagement, that wealth could be realized in a way that benefits both Somaliland’s 4 million citizens and the broader free world’s industrial needs.
For American policymakers, supporting U.S.–Somaliland mining ventures is a chance to demonstrate leadership in Africa on a critical issue, without the baggage of legacy complications. Somaliland, unencumbered by recognition politics in this context, is essentially a greenfield where American ingenuity and ethical business can take root, free from direct Chinese control. Every rare earth magnet, lithium battery, or advanced microchip that uses inputs from Somaliland is one made with less reliance on Beijing – a small yet significant shift toward supply chain security. As Michael Rubin of AEI warned, U.S. narrow focus on Mogadishu in the past overlooked a stable, pro-West Somaliland and “allowed China to monopolize rare earths crucial for modern tech” (The US State Department Puts China First on Rare Earth Metals | Saxafi Media). We now have an opportunity to correct that oversight and break China’s grip by bringing Somaliland into the fold.
From an investor perspective, early movers in Somaliland could position themselves at the forefront of the next big mineral discovery. The groundwork laid by Taiwan and others means much of the risk has been mitigated. If the U.S. government backs its rhetoric with resources – via DFC financing, policy support, and perhaps even defense tie-ins – then the path is clear for bold American companies to step in. The payoff could be enormous: imagine a future where a significant percentage of U.S. rare earth imports come not from adversary-controlled sources, but from a friendly Somaliland-U.S. joint venture, mined under African sun and shipped from the Red Sea straight to American factories. That scenario would have seemed far-fetched a few years ago; today it is within reach.
In conclusion, pursuing U.S.–Somaliland mining partnerships is strategically sound, economically sensible, and morally positive. It exemplifies the kind of innovative thinking required to secure critical supply chains in an era of great power competition. Policymakers and investors should seize this moment to build a lasting alliance with Somaliland. By doing so, the United States can cement its status as both a global technological leader and a principled partner to those who share its vision of a free, secure, and prosperous world. The mines of Somaliland, long dormant, are ready to roar to life – and with them, a new chapter in U.S.–Africa cooperation can begin, to the benefit of both American national security and Somaliland’s future.
Sources:
- Somaliland Ministry of Investment – Mining Potential Overview (Mining) (Mining)
- Somaliland Chronicle – Saudi Mining Company Kilomass Secures Lithium Deal (June 11, 2024) (Saudi Mining Company Kilomass Secures Lithium Exploration Deal in Somaliland – Somaliland Chronicle) (Saudi Mining Company Kilomass Secures Lithium Exploration Deal in Somaliland – Somaliland Chronicle)
- Congressional Record – Rep. Chris Smith remarks on Somaliland Lithium (2025) (#congressman #dfc #sustainableenergy #lithiumproject #sustainableenergy… | Orina Chang 張綺真)
- Saxafi Media – State Dept. putting China first on Rare Earths (LinkedIn post) (The US State Department Puts China First on Rare Earth Metals | Saxafi Media)
- Atlantic Council – Africa’s Critical Minerals and China (Sept 9, 2024) (The strategies driving the players in competition for Africa’s critical minerals – Atlantic Council) (The strategies driving the players in competition for Africa’s critical minerals – Atlantic Council)
- Horndiplomat/Semafor – Somalia offers US control of ports to block Somaliland (Mar 2025) (Somalia Offers US Control Over Strategic Ports to Block Somaliland Recognition) (Somalia Offers US Control Over Strategic Ports to Block Somaliland Recognition)
- India Shipping News – DP World Berbera Port Expansion (July 2021) (DP World and Somaliland open new terminal at Berbera Port, announce second phase expansion and break ground for Economic Zone – India Shipping News) (DP World and Somaliland open new terminal at Berbera Port, announce second phase expansion and break ground for Economic Zone – India Shipping News)
- Somaliland Chronicle – Taiwan–Somaliland Energy/Minerals Cooperation (May 24, 2022) (Taiwan signs the Energy and Mineral Resources Cooperation Agreement with Somaliland – Somaliland Chronicle) (Taiwan signs the Energy and Mineral Resources Cooperation Agreement with Somaliland – Somaliland Chronicle)
- ForeignAffairs.house.gov – Hearing on CCP Influence in African Minerals (Smith Opening Statement, 2025) (Africa Subcommittee Chairman Smith Delivers Opening Remarks at Hearing on the CCP’s Influence on Critical Minerals in Africa – Committee on Foreign Affairs) (Africa Subcommittee Chairman Smith Delivers Opening Remarks at Hearing on the CCP’s Influence on Critical Minerals in Africa – Committee on Foreign Affairs)
- Ministry of Energy & Minerals (Somaliland) – Mining Dept. Reports (Mining – Wasaaradda Tamarta iyo Macdanta) (Mining – Wasaaradda Tamarta iyo Macdanta).
Somaliland
Irro Unites Somaliland’s Political Class as Mogadishu Escalates Threats
President Irro Forms National Political Front After Israel Recognition Amid Rising Tensions with Mogadishu.
President Abdirahman Mohamed Abdullahi (Irro) has moved decisively to lock in Somaliland’s internal stability at a moment of historic transition. In a high-stakes national consultation, he brought together the senior leadership of all three national parties—WADDANI, KAAH, and KULMIYE—marking a rare show of unity in Somaliland’s modern political history.
This was not routine politics. It was a strategic consolidation of power and purpose following Israel’s formal recognition of Somaliland and the sharp escalation in hostile rhetoric from the Federal Government of Somalia. Irro framed the recognition not as an endpoint, but as the beginning of a new and more demanding phase—one that requires discipline, maturity, and collective responsibility.
By briefing opposition leaders on the security and diplomatic realities facing the country, the president dismantled any space for internal fragmentation. The message was unambiguous: Somaliland is not seeking confrontation, but its sovereignty is non-negotiable. Any attempt to threaten or invade Somaliland, he warned, will be met with firm resistance—and responsibility for escalation will rest squarely with Mogadishu.
Crucially, Irro called on party leaders to actively shield the nation from internal destabilization, urging them to suppress inflammatory rhetoric and prioritize national cohesion over partisan gain. The response was striking. Leaders from all three parties publicly endorsed the president’s approach, praised his diplomatic achievements, and pledged to stand behind the government during this critical period.
The contrast with Mogadishu could not be sharper. While Somalia’s federal leadership issues decrees it cannot enforce and struggles with internal fractures, Somaliland is demonstrating the core attribute of statehood: unity under pressure.
Irro has effectively shifted the national focus from electoral rivalry to statecraft. In doing so, he has sent a clear signal—to citizens, adversaries, and the international community—that Somaliland enters this new diplomatic era united, confident, and prepared. Israel was the first recognition. The groundwork is now laid for what comes next.
Somaliland
Irro Unites Somaliland’s Diplomatic Warriors as Recognition Era Begins
President Irro Consults Former Somaliland Foreign Ministers to Shape Post-Recognition Diplomacy.
President Abdirahman Mohamed Abdullahi (Irro) has taken a decisive and symbolic step to consolidate Somaliland’s diplomatic momentum by convening a historic meeting with former Ministers of Foreign Affairs — the architects of the country’s long, uphill struggle for international recognition.
The gathering was more than ceremonial. It was a strategic act of statecraft. By bringing together seven former foreign ministers — and publicly honoring all 15 who have served Somaliland since 1991, including those deceased — President Irro framed recognition not as a personal victory, but as a collective national achievement built over decades.
Calling them the “mujahideen of foreign policy,” the president underscored a central message: recognition is the product of continuity, patience, and institutional memory. In a region where politics often resets with each administration, Irro is deliberately anchoring Somaliland’s new diplomatic phase in accumulated experience.
Crucially, the meeting focused on the new stage Somaliland has entered following Israel’s recognition — a phase that demands unity, discipline, and strategic clarity. Irro emphasized that foreign policy going forward must be rooted in cooperation, mutual respect, and shared interests, while rejecting isolation or ideological rigidity. Somaliland, he stressed, is open to all partners acting in good faith.
The former ministers, for their part, welcomed the consultation as a break from past practice and a sign of political maturity. Their unified support sends a powerful signal to both domestic and international audiences: Somaliland’s diplomatic front is aligned, cohesive, and confident.
Beyond symbolism, the ministers offered concrete recommendations for navigating the current moment — a reminder that recognition brings opportunity, but also pressure, scrutiny, and new risks.
The meeting’s deeper significance lies in its timing. As regional tensions rise and Somalia’s rhetoric grows more hostile, Irro’s call for unity and vigilance reinforces a core Somaliland doctrine: national cohesion is the first line of defense and the strongest tool for advancing statehood.
In bringing past and present together, President Irro is not just managing recognition — he is institutionalizing it. The message is unmistakable: Somaliland’s diplomacy is no longer improvisational. It is deliberate, inclusive, and entering a new era with its full historical weight behind it.
EDITORIAL
Somalia Ends UAE Defense Pact, Opening New Diplomatic Path for Somaliland
Mogadishu Walks Away, Hargeisa Steps Forward: How Somalia’s UAE Rift Speeds Somaliland Recognition.
Somalia’s decision to formally annul its security and defense agreements with the United Arab Emirates marks more than a routine diplomatic dispute. It signals a structural shift in the Horn of Africa — one that increasingly favors Somaliland’s long campaign for international recognition.
Mogadishu has presented the move as an assertion of sovereignty. In reality, it exposes the limits of that sovereignty. By cutting ties with Abu Dhabi, the Federal Government of Somalia has effectively abandoned the “Mogadishu First” framework that once allowed it to act as the primary gatekeeper for regional partnerships. The result is a widening opening for Somaliland to consolidate its position as a reliable, self-governing state actor.
The contrast between the two administrations is stark. While Somalia’s cabinet framed its decision in defensive terms, Somaliland’s response — led by Minister of the Presidency Khadar Hussein Abdi — projected confidence and continuity. His message was simple but decisive: partnerships are built on trust, delivery, and long-term consistency. Somaliland, not Mogadishu, has provided that consistency.
Nowhere is this clearer than in Berbera. When international actors hesitated, the UAE invested. That investment reshaped Berbera from a marginal port into a strategic maritime hub linking the Gulf, the Red Sea, and East Africa. For Abu Dhabi, Somaliland has evolved from a local partner into a cornerstone of its regional logistics and security strategy.
Israel’s formal recognition of Somaliland has accelerated this trajectory. It has transformed quiet cooperation into open geopolitical momentum. A new strategic triangle — Hargeisa, Abu Dhabi, and Jerusalem — is beginning to take shape, with direct implications for Red Sea security and global shipping lanes.
Several dynamics make UAE recognition of Somaliland increasingly plausible. First is economic reality. With defense ties severed in Mogadishu, the UAE’s multi-billion-dollar interests in Berbera rest entirely on Somaliland’s legal and security framework. Formal recognition would lock in those investments and remove lingering diplomatic ambiguity.
Second is regional alignment. Somaliland’s growing relationship with Israel fits naturally within the broader logic of the Abraham Accords. A Somaliland recognized by both Israel and the UAE would form a stability corridor along the Bab el-Mandeb — a critical chokepoint for global trade.
Third is power redistribution. As Somalia deepens its dependence on Turkey and Saudi Arabia, the UAE is recalibrating. Securing its maritime interests requires partners that control territory, guarantee security, and honor agreements. Somaliland meets all three criteria.
Mogadishu’s claims of authority over Berbera, Bosaso, and Kismayo increasingly ring hollow. In modern diplomacy, legitimacy is measured less by inherited charters and more by effective governance. Somaliland has maintained internal security, held multiple democratic transitions, and governed its territory continuously since 1991.
Somalia’s exit from the UAE defense pact is therefore not a setback for Abu Dhabi — it is a release. It frees the UAE from Somalia’s internal contradictions and redirects its focus toward its most successful Horn of Africa partnership.
As Mogadishu narrows its options, Somaliland expands its horizon. Recognition is no longer a distant aspiration. It is becoming the logical endpoint of a long-running geopolitical realignment. The remaining question is not whether Somaliland will gain further recognition — but how soon the next domino falls.
Opinion
Shared Scars: The Parallel Existential Struggles of Israel and Somaliland.
The histories of Israel and Somaliland are etched with the profound trauma of genocide and defined by a continuous struggle for survival against hostile neighbors. Though separated by geography and culture, their historical converge on a stark common ground: both are nations forged in the fires of catastrophic violence, fighting for their very existence against adversaries dedicated to their erasure.
The Shadow of Genocide:
For both peoples, the term “genocide” is not an abstract historical concept but a lived, painful reality that shapes their national identity and geopolitical posture.
Israel and the Holocaust:
The foundation of modern Israel is inextricably linked to the Holocaust, the systematic murder of six million Jews by Nazi Germany and its collaborators. This unparalleled catastrophe demonstrated the existential vulnerability of the Jewish people without a sovereign state, a core motivation for Israel’s establishment and reclaiming the homeland of their ancestors with the determination to ensure “never again.”
Somaliland and the Isaaq Genocide:
Between 1987 and 1989, the regime of Somali dictator Mohamed Siad Barre perpetrated a systematic campaign of annihilation against the Isaaq clan, the majority population of Somaliland. This campaign, officially recognized as a genocide by a United Nations investigation, included the near-total destruction of major cities. Hargeisa, Somaliland’s capital, was approximately 90% destroyed, leading to its grim nickname, “the Dresden of Africa”. The violence was executed with brutal efficiency, involving indiscriminate aerial bombardments. Notably, the Somali regime employed foreign mercenaries, including South African mercenary pilots who conducted airstrikes against civilian areas.
The regime’s propaganda of dehumanising the Isaaq people, labeling them as Jewish with derogatory epithets to justify their extermination.
The Perpetual Threat of Hostile Neighbours:
The trauma of genocide is compounded by an ongoing, fundamental conflict with neighboring entities that reject their right to exist.
Israel’s Regional Adversaries:
Israel’s primary conflict is with Hamas, which is formally dedicated to Israel’s destruction. Hamas launched a large-scale attack on Israel on 7 October 2023 firing thousands of rockets and sending fighters into Israeli towns, killing civilians and soldiers and taking hostages. This conflict is embedded within a broader regional confrontation with state and non-state actors, many backed by Iran, which also openly seeks to eliminate the Jewish state. This includes persistent threats from Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Houthis in Yemen.
Somaliland’s Struggle with Somalia:
Since restoring independence in 1991, Somaliland’s most pressing existential threat is the Federal Republic of Somalia and their Alshabab cohort. These entities are unreasonably against somaliland’s restoration of sovereignty in 1991. Mogadishu wages a relentless diplomatic and, at times, military campaign to undermine Somaliland’s sovereignty. This includes supporting proxy forces within Somaliland’s borders. The Las Anod conflict in 2023 is a prime example, where Somali-backed SSC-Khatumo forces fought against the Somaliland National Army. Mogadishu is constantly fuelling internal strife in Somaliland by providing military hardware to minority clans, viewing it as a strategy to destabilize the breakaway region.
Facing New Existential Fears:
The struggle for recognition and security is a daily reality, with recent developments exacerbating these fears.
For Somaliland, the prospect of a renewed large-scale conflict is a palpable fear. These anxieties were heightened in early 2026 when Somalia’s Defence Minister, Ahmed Moalim Fiqi, appealed to Arab nations, Turkey and Egypt , “especially Saudi Arabia,” to take action against Somaliland’s leadership. While Fiqi’s public comments focused on opposing Somaliland’s independence and its relations with Israel, his rhetoric—calling for international pressure and drawing parallels to other regional conflicts—is interpreted in Hargeisa as a direct threat to its survival, stirring memories of past genocide.
Conclusion: An Unending Fight for Existence
Israel and Somaliland, though vastly different in scale and international standing, are bound by a shared historical arc of suffering and resilience. The Holocaust and the Isaaq genocide are foundational tragedies that inform their unwavering focus on self-preservation. Today, both navigate a complex and hostile regional environment where neighboring powers fundamentally challenge their legitimacy. For Israel, the threats are well-documented and widely recognized. For Somaliland, the fight is for the world to acknowledge its historical trauma and its ongoing battle for survival against a neighbor that once sought to eliminate it and continues to deny its right to exist. Their stories are a sobering reminder of how the scars of genocide shape a nation’s destiny and its perpetual struggle for a secure future.
Mo Saeed
Somaliland legal research (SLR)
Somaliland
Calls to Bomb Somaliland Trigger Historic Warning
Somalia Revives 1988 Rhetoric: Somaliland Condemns Somalia’s Bombing Threats, Citing 1988 Genocide and Violations of International Law.
Somaliland has issued a sharp diplomatic warning after senior Somali officials openly called for military attacks on its territory, reviving rhetoric that many Somalilanders associate with one of the darkest chapters in their history.
In a statement released this week, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Somaliland condemned remarks by Somalia’s Minister of Defense, Ahmed Moallim Fiqi, who urged Arab countries — particularly Saudi Arabia — to bomb Somaliland “as they did in Yemen.” Hargeisa said the comments violate international law and the United Nations Charter and amount to incitement of war.
For Somaliland, the language is not abstract. Officials drew a direct parallel to 1988, when the Siad Barre regime hired foreign pilots and mercenaries to bombard Hargeisa and Burao, killing 500 of thousands of civilians in what is widely documented as genocide against the Isaaq population. The reference has struck a nerve across Somaliland, where collective memory of the air raids remains central to national identity.
The Foreign Ministry said the threats underscore why Somaliland remains united in defending its sovereignty, just as it did during the SNM-led resistance of the late 1980s. That uprising ultimately led to Somaliland’s withdrawal from the failed union and the restoration of its independence in 1991.
Hargeisa also dismissed Mogadishu’s threats as hollow, noting that Somalia remains heavily dependent on international aid and has failed for more than two decades to fully secure its own capital from Al-Shabaab. Recent Somalia threats against Israel — following Israel’s recognition of Somaliland — were described by officials as further evidence of political desperation rather than strategic capacity.
Adding to tensions, Somaliland pointed to Turkey’s recent delivery of military equipment to Mogadishu, warning that external militarization risks emboldening reckless rhetoric in an already fragile region.
For Somaliland, the message is clear: calls to repeat the crimes of 1988 will not intimidate a society that survived them. Instead, officials argue, such statements reinforce Somaliland’s case as a stable, self-governing state — and highlight Somalia’s continued struggle as one of the world’s most enduring failed states.
The Ghost of Sovereignty: Mogadishu’s Hollow Claim Over Somaliland Exposed
Somaliland
Irro Draws the Line: New Sovereignty Era Demands a New State
Somaliland President Irro Orders Government Overhaul After Israel Recognition, Demands Accountability and Discipline.
President Abdirahman Mohamed Abdullahi (Irro) has moved swiftly to redefine how Somaliland governs itself in the wake of Israel’s historic recognition, signaling that diplomacy alone will not secure Somaliland’s future — institutions will.
In a high-level meeting with the Chairman of the Civil Service Commission, Directors General of ministries, and heads of independent national institutions, Irro framed recognition not as a symbolic victory, but as a stress test. Somaliland, he made clear, has entered a new strategic, diplomatic and security phase — and the old habits of governance will no longer suffice.
The message was blunt: sovereignty must be earned daily through performance.
Irro told senior officials that competence, transparency, accountability and efficiency are now non-negotiable. The quality of administration, the speed of institutional delivery and the integrity of public service, he said, are the real measures by which both Somaliland’s citizens and the international community will judge the state.
In a pointed directive, the president ordered government leaders to ground their work in justice, good governance, impartiality, rule of law and a zero-tolerance approach to corruption. He warned against internal administrative conflicts, weak coordination and any behavior that could erode public trust at a moment when Somaliland is under unprecedented global scrutiny.
This was not a celebration meeting — it was a recalibration.
Officials responded with open loyalty. Senior civil servants praised Irro’s leadership, crediting him with elevating Somaliland’s international standing in a matter of weeks and handling the Israel recognition talks with exceptional discipline and secrecy. Several described the diplomatic process as a lesson in statecraft they intend to replicate within government institutions.
The undertone was clear: recognition has raised the bar.
By pushing his administration to accelerate national obligations and fully meet their legal mandates, Irro is laying the groundwork for a state that behaves like a recognized country even before universal recognition arrives. The pledge from Directors General to improve transparency and service delivery suggests alignment — at least for now.
This meeting signals the emergence of a governance-first doctrine: Somaliland will not argue for sovereignty through rhetoric alone, but through institutional maturity. In the post-recognition era, Irro is betting that credibility, not applause, will decide Somaliland’s next chapter.
Comment
The Brutal Logic Behind the Turkey-Somaliland Clash
Hargeisa Draws the Line: Somaliland Rejects Ankara’s Patronage Politics.
Somaliland’s response to recent remarks by Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan marks more than a diplomatic spat. It signals a strategic shift — one that places Hargeisa firmly in control of its narrative, its alliances, and its future.
When Fidan attempted to frame Somaliland’s foreign relations as a “religious disaster,” the reaction from Hargeisa was swift and calculated. Rather than engaging in emotional rebuttal, Somaliland’s Minister of the Presidency, Khadar Hussein Abdi, delivered a precise message: Mogadishu has neither the authority nor the capacity to decide Somaliland’s affairs — including who sets foot on its soil.
That statement crystallized what can now be described as the Hargeisa Doctrine: sovereignty is not requested, negotiated, or deferred. It is exercised.
For decades, Somaliland played defense — seeking validation, patiently arguing its case, and tolerating external actors who treated its stability as useful but its sovereignty as inconvenient. This moment represents a clean break from that posture. Abdi’s response did not ask Turkey to understand Somaliland’s position; it asserted it.
Ankara’s appeal to religious solidarity was not lost on Hargeisa. Somaliland’s leadership recognized it as a political tool — one designed to maintain Turkey’s entrenched interests in Mogadishu while sidelining a functioning, democratic polity that has governed itself peacefully for over 35 years. By rejecting that framing, Somaliland exposed the gap between rhetoric and reality.
What makes this episode significant is not confrontation, but confidence. Somaliland is no longer explaining why it deserves partnerships — it is choosing them. Engagements with Israel, the UAE, and other pragmatic actors reflect a foreign policy anchored in maritime security, trade integration, and long-term economic resilience, not ideological loyalty tests.
By calling out Turkey’s decades-long absence from Somaliland’s development while attempting to assert influence today, Hargeisa delivered an uncomfortable truth: strategic importance cannot be invoked selectively. Respect follows consistency.
This is modern sovereignty in action. Somaliland is positioning itself not as a “territory awaiting recognition,” but as a capable authority already delivering governance, security, and growth in one of the world’s most sensitive corridors — the Gulf of Aden and Red Sea basin.
The so-called “anger” noted in international coverage is better understood as discipline. A disciplined refusal to be spoken for. A disciplined insistence that the land belongs to those who govern it, protect it, and build its future.
In that sense, Somaliland’s message to Ankara was not defiance. It was doctrine.
HISTORY SEALED IN HARGEISA
Israel and Somaliland Enter a New Strategic Era
HISTORY SEALED IN HARGEISA – President Irro Hosts Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar in Landmark Post-Recognition Talks.
HARGEISA — President Abdirahman Mohamed Abdullahi (Irro) today received Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar and his delegation at the Presidential Palace, marking the highest-level foreign visit to Somaliland in more than three decades and the first since Israel formally recognized Somaliland’s sovereignty.
Speaking on behalf of the nation, President Irro thanked the government and people of Israel for what he described as a “courageous and historic” decision, saying the recognition carries profound diplomatic, economic, and developmental implications not only for Somaliland, but for the Horn of Africa and beyond.
“Today is a great day for the Republic of Somaliland,” the president said, stressing that Israel’s recognition strengthens Somaliland’s role as a pillar of peace, democracy, freedom of expression, and regional stability. He said the move opens wide opportunities in investment, trade, technology, energy, water, minerals, agriculture, and critical economic infrastructure.
President Irro underscored that Somaliland is fully ready to cooperate with Israel across all sectors, framing the relationship as one built on shared strategic interests and mutual respect.
For his part, Foreign Minister Sa’ar said Israel is proud to have granted full recognition to Somaliland and is prepared to establish deep, comprehensive relations that benefit both nations and their peoples. He emphasized that Israel’s decision is grounded in the right of the Somaliland people to self-determination, as well as long-term security and stability in the Horn of Africa.
Sa’ar praised Somaliland’s democratic governance, internal peace, and constructive regional role, calling Somaliland a responsible state that contributes to global security and sustainable development. He added that Israel is committed to presenting Somaliland’s historical and independent statehood to the international community — a history he said has been ignored for far too long.
In a symbolic moment, Sa’ar noted that Israel recognized Somaliland on 26 June 1960, reaffirmed that recognition on 26 December 2025, and “will stand with Somaliland into the future.”
The visit, the first by a foreign minister in 34 years, marks the formal launch of a new political, strategic, and security partnership between Somaliland and Israel — one that signals a decisive shift from diplomatic isolation to global engagement.
President Irro closed by assuring Israel that Somaliland is a reliable partner, strategically located and ready to play a central role in future peace and security across the Horn of Africa and the wider world.
-
Analysis10 months agoSaudi Arabia’s Billion-Dollar Bid for Eritrea’s Assab Port
-
Opinion17 years agoSomaliland Needs a Paradigm Change: Now or Never!
-
Interagency Assessment4 weeks agoTOP SECRET SHIFT: U.S. MILITARY ORDERED INTO SOMALILAND BY LAW
-
Somaliland3 months agoSomaliland Recognition: US, UK, Israel, and Gulf Bloc Poised for Historic Shift
-
EDITORIAL1 year agoDr. Edna Adan Champions the Evolving Partnership Between Somaliland and Ethiopia
-
ASSESSMENTS10 months agoOperation Geel Exposes the Truth: International Community’s Reluctance to Embrace Somaliland as a Strategic Ally
-
Top stories2 years ago
Ireland, Norway and Spain to recognize Palestinian state
-
Somaliland12 months agoSomaliland and UAE Elevate Ties to Comprehensive Strategic Partnership
