Connect with us

Top stories

Biden’s Final Diplomatic Push at APEC and G20 Amid Rising Concerns over Future U.S. Policy

Published

on

President Joe Biden faces the challenge of reassuring international partners uncertain about the trajectory of U.S. foreign policy as Donald Trump, with his assertive “America First” agenda, prepares to assume the presidency again. As Biden heads to Peru and Brazil for key economic summits, he faces questions from leaders anxious about potential shifts in U.S. commitments to global cooperation on climate, trade, and security.

Biden’s itinerary includes two influential summits—the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum in Lima and the Group of 20 (G20) meeting in Rio de Janeiro. Amid talks focused on trade and sustainable development, the president’s primary mission will be to strengthen alliances and reassure U.S. allies, who watched the U.S. pull out of pivotal international agreements during Trump’s first term.

The APEC summit, which unites 21 economies across the Asia-Pacific region, is set to emphasize free trade and economic cooperation. While Biden will highlight partnerships strengthened during his administration, especially with Japan, South Korea, Australia, and the Philippines, doubts about continuity loom large. At a trilateral meeting with South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol and Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, Biden aims to underscore that recent strides in regional security and economic cooperation are lasting.

National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan previewed Biden’s strategy, stating the president intends to remind leaders that “America’s allies are vital to America’s national security.” He emphasized that Biden will make clear that these alliances “multiply our capability” and contribute to shared causes—positioning U.S. alliances in the Asia-Pacific as an enduring commitment, despite the impending administration change.

At APEC, Biden will also hold what is expected to be his final meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping, as the two leaders grapple with deepening complexities in U.S.-China relations. With Trump already appointing prominent China critics to key positions, Biden’s dialogue with Xi is likely to focus on ensuring stable diplomatic channels as the U.S. potentially adopts a more adversarial stance. Trump’s previous administration saw tariffs, trade barriers, and military posturing become central to U.S.-China policy, and Biden’s more cooperative approach could face significant changes.

China, meanwhile, is positioning itself as a symbol of stability, with Xi promoting Beijing’s infrastructure investment across Latin America, a region critical to his vision of expanding Chinese influence. Xi is set to inaugurate a $1.3 billion megaport in Peru, showcasing China’s economic commitments to Latin American nations and reinforcing Beijing’s message of reliable leadership. Chinese state media emphasizes that Xi’s recent engagement in 11 Latin American countries contrasts with U.S. foreign policy shifts, signaling China’s intent to capitalize on perceived U.S. inconsistencies.

As Biden arrives in Rio, he plans to emphasize American leadership on global poverty, climate change, and labor rights. The G20, representing the world’s largest economies, offers a platform for Biden to advocate policies targeting shared global challenges. While in Brazil, he will endorse President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva’s Global Alliance Against Hunger and Poverty initiative, aiming to accelerate efforts to end hunger by 2030.

However, many of Biden’s initiatives may have limited longevity under a Trump administration, particularly in areas like climate policy. Biden’s stop in Manaus—the first by a sitting U.S. president in the Brazilian Amazon—will include discussions with Indigenous leaders on rainforest conservation, underscoring his administration’s commitment to environmental stewardship. Yet, Trump’s previous skepticism toward international climate agreements casts doubt on the durability of Biden’s green agenda.

Biden’s farewell tour ultimately underscores the uncertainty facing U.S. allies, many of whom viewed his administration as a stabilizing counterbalance to the previous administration’s policies. As Josh Lipsky of the Atlantic Council notes, Biden is expected to reinforce that “American engagement around the world” is an enduring ideal. According to Lipsky, Biden believes that “not one election or one president can undercut” the U.S.’s global role.

While Biden’s message is intended to project confidence, analysts caution that, for many leaders, the reality is more complex. Victor Cha, president of the Geopolitics and Foreign Policy Department at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, suggests that Biden’s counterparts are likely to respond with “lamenting, speculation, [and] guessing” as they try to anticipate Trump’s policy moves.

As he heads back to Washington, Biden leaves behind a mixed legacy of achievements and challenges, with a U.S. policy landscape on the brink of a significant shift. Amid Xi’s bids to expand Chinese influence in Latin America and a Trump administration poised to recalibrate U.S. priorities, Biden’s trip may serve as a final reminder to allies of the value of American diplomacy, even as questions about its future linger.

Top stories

Chaos at Kenya’s Main Airport – Fire Erupts, Panic Spreads

Published

on

A fire erupts inside Kenya’s largest airport, sparking fears of disruption and chaos. Emergency teams scramble to contain the flames—are flights safe?

Kenya’s busiest airport turned into a scene of panic after a fire broke out inside its compound, sending emergency teams scrambling. The flames erupted in a northern section of Jomo Kenyatta International Airport, raising fears of flight disruptions and security threats.

Kenya Airways rushed to reassure the public, insisting the fire was not near the runway. But with smoke visible in parts of the airport, uncertainty spread fast. Emergency response teams, including the Kenya Red Cross, moved in to contain the inferno, battling flames in a desperate bid to keep the situation under control.

The cause of the fire remains unknown. Given JKIA’s past fire-related incidents, concerns of deeper vulnerabilities are mounting. Is this just an accident, or does it signal something far worse? As global tensions rise, no major transport hub can afford to take risks.

For now, flights continue, but the fear lingers. Authorities are on high alert, and the question remains—was this just a fire, or a warning?

Continue Reading

Editor's Pick

UK Appoints Charles Nicholas King as New Ambassador to Somalia

Published

on

The UK’s appointment of Charles Nicholas King as its new ambassador to Somalia signals a strategic move in its diplomatic approach to the Horn of Africa. With a background deeply rooted in conflict resolution, counterterrorism, and regional stability, King’s tenure will likely focus on supporting Somalia’s fight against al-Shabaab, strengthening Somali governance reforms, and enhancing UK-Somalia diplomatic and economic ties.

His previous experience leading the Gaza Taskforce, shaping British policy in Syria, Iraq, and Libya, and engaging in Levant and North African affairs positions him as a seasoned crisis diplomat—one who understands fragile states and counterterrorism strategies. This expertise will be crucial as Somalia continues its military campaign against al-Shabaab, expands state-building efforts, and seeks stronger international partnerships to stabilize the region.

As Somalia deepens its ties with Western allies, King’s leadership in Mogadishu could mark a pivotal shift in UK-Somalia relations, particularly in security cooperation, counter-extremism, and political development. His track record suggests a strong emphasis on diplomatic engagement, possibly with an increased role for the UK in Somalia’s security sector and regional stabilization initiatives.

The months ahead will reveal whether his appointment translates into tangible policy shifts—or whether British engagement remains largely advisory in Somalia’s fight for security and sovereignty.

Continue Reading

Top stories

Sabrina Elba Joins Djiboutian Director Lula’s in Groundbreaking Somali Diaspora Film

Published

on

Adaptation of Hassan Ghedi Santur’s The Youth of God Explores Migration, Faith, and Radicalization

Sabrina Dhowre Elba’s casting in Nuur signals a major moment for Somali cinema. Directed by Lula Ali Ismaïl, Djibouti’s first female filmmaker, the adaptation of Hassan Ghedi Santur’s novel The Youth of God brings a powerful, deeply personal narrative to the big screen.

The Youth of God is a critically acclaimed novel by Somali-Canadian writer Hassan Ghedi Santur (pictured). Photo: Courtesy Mawenzi House

Elba plays Haawo, a Somali mother navigating single parenthood and cultural displacement in Toronto, forced into a desperate search when her teenage son vanishes. The story confronts radicalization, identity crises, and the tension between faith and Western aspirations—a theme rarely explored with this depth in mainstream cinema.

With a stellar cast including Omar Abdi and Hamza Fouad, Nuur is poised to redefine Somali storytelling. Santur’s source material, longlisted for Canada Reads 2020, offers an unflinching look at the alienation faced by Somali youth caught between traditional values and the pressures of Western life.

Lula Ali Ismaïl, known for Dhalinyaro, has cemented her reputation as a director who elevates African diaspora narratives. With Nuur, she steps into even more ambitious territory, blending a thriller-like urgency with deeply emotional storytelling.

Actors Hamza Fouad (Riverdale) (far left) and Omar Abdi (The Gravedigger’s Wife) (center) join director Lula Ali Ismaïl (far right) in the upcoming feature film Nuur.

This film arrives at a critical time, as discussions around migration, identity, and extremism remain highly relevant. Backed by Telefilm Canada and produced by Scythia Films, Nuur has the potential to break new ground in African and diaspora cinema.

Filming begins later this year—expect Nuur to be a must-watch.

Continue Reading

Top stories

U.S. and UAE Joint Operation Kills 16 ISIS Militants in Puntland Stronghold

Published

on

U.S. airstrikes in Puntland killed 16 ISIS militants, including top bomb-makers. The operation, backed by UAE forces, targeted key hideouts in Somalia’s Cal Miskaad mountains. 

The U.S. just tightened the noose on ISIS-Somalia, launching a devastating airstrike that killed 16 militants, including two senior bomb-makers. In a region where ISIS has dug into mountainous strongholds, this precision strike in Puntland’s Cal Miskaad range sends a clear message: the U.S. and its allies aren’t backing down.

The United Arab Emirates’ involvement in the operation signals a wider regional effort to eliminate ISIS footholds in Puntland, a critical staging ground for terrorist expansion into Somalia and beyond. Somalia’s President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud hailed the strike as proof of a strong U.S.-Somalia partnership, emphasizing that Mogadishu is fully aligned with Washington’s counterterrorism strategy.

This isn’t an isolated hit—just weeks ago, a similar U.S. assault wiped out 14 ISIS operatives, including Ahmed Maeleninine, a key ISIS recruiter funneling foreign fighters into the U.S. and Europe. These strikes are part of a relentless campaign aimed at eradicating ISIS leadership, disrupting its supply chains, and neutralizing its drone capabilities—a growing threat evident from the seven drones launched by militants during Sunday’s raid.

Puntland has declared all-out war on extremist groups, claiming to have eliminated over 200 ISIS fighters since launching its military offensive. But ISIS isn’t going down quietly—if its drone warfare and fortified mountain bases are any indication, the battle for Puntland is far from over.

With the U.S. stepping up its direct involvement, and regional players like UAE actively participating, ISIS-Somalia’s days are numbered—but the question remains: how deep is the terror network’s resilience, and can Puntland’s forces maintain the pressure without sustained U.S. air support?

Continue Reading

Top stories

Europe in Crisis as U.S. Signals Transatlantic Reset

Published

on

European Leaders Scramble for Security Strategy Amid Trump’s Shift on NATO and Ukraine

Europe is on its own—at least, that’s the new reality unfolding after Washington’s drastic shift on Ukraine and NATO. In Paris, British PM Keir Starmer, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, and NATO’s Mark Rutte met in an emergency security summit, confronting the cold truth: America’s commitment to European security is fading.

The biggest shock? Trump’s direct talks with Putin—set to begin in Saudi Arabia—without Ukraine or European nations at the table. For the first time since Russia’s 2022 invasion, Moscow is no longer isolated, and the fate of Ukraine is being decided behind closed doors.

U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth delivered another blow, telling NATO allies that Ukraine is unlikely to reclaim pre-2014 borders, won’t join NATO, and won’t receive U.S. troops. Europe, long reliant on American military backing, is now being forced into a crash course in self-reliance.

France and Germany now face a defining moment: increase defense spending, commit troops, and take responsibility—or risk irrelevance. Starmer even hinted at deploying British peacekeepers in Ukraine, but only if the U.S. provides security guarantees—a clear sign that Europe still doesn’t trust its own power.

Meanwhile, Trump’s Vice President JD Vance took a swipe at European democracy, calling mass migration and political censorship bigger threats than Russia or China. His comments rattled European leaders, showing just how deep the transatlantic fracture has become.

With only 23 out of 32 NATO members meeting defense spending targets, Europe is racing against time to prepare for a world where the U.S. no longer plays the role of guardian. As Putin tightens his grip on the battlefield, European leaders are waking up to the harshest geopolitical reality in decades.

The era of American-led European security is ending—and Europe has no choice but to fight for its own future.

Continue Reading

Top stories

Turkey Moves to Counter UAE Influence in Somaliland as Trump Weighs Recognition

Published

on

As Trump’s administration considers recognizing Somaliland, Turkey strengthens ties with Hargeisa to challenge UAE’s expanding influence. 

For the first time in years, Turkey’s Ambassador to Somalia, Alper Aktaş, visited Somaliland, signaling a major geopolitical shift. The timing of the visit is no coincidence—it comes as Somaliland’s growing ties with the UAE and the U.S. have raised concerns in Ankara, which has long positioned itself as a key player in the Horn of Africa.

Turkey’s deepening engagement in Somaliland is a calculated move to curb Dubai’s increasing influence over Somaliland’s ports, economy, and regional alliances. The Berbera Port, controlled by UAE’s DP World, has become a critical asset, fueling economic expansion and potential U.S. military interest. Turkey, which has a strong alliance with Mogadishu, sees UAE’s rise in Somaliland as a direct challenge.

The Trump administration’s ongoing deliberations over formal recognition of Somaliland add another layer of urgency to Turkey’s engagement. If Washington grants Somaliland official recognition, it would not only solidify Somaliland’s autonomy but also create a new U.S. strategic outpost in the region—an alternative to Djibouti, where China has expanded military influence.

Turkey, which has historically mediated between Mogadishu and Hargeisa, is now stepping into Somaliland more directly. Is Ankara preparing to play both sides, or is it realigning its regional ambitions? With Ethiopia seeking maritime access, the UAE expanding its economic grip, and the U.S. weighing a game-changing diplomatic shift, Somaliland has become a flashpoint for global power competition.

What’s next? If Turkey succeeds in counterbalancing the UAE, it could push for a greater role in regional security and trade agreements. However, if the U.S. recognizes Somaliland, Ankara may be forced to choose between its Somali ally and a rising strategic power in Hargeisa.

Continue Reading

Top stories

Sweden’s Immigrants on Edge After Mass Shooting

Published

on

Sweden’s immigrant community is reeling after a mass shooting in Örebro left 10 dead. Investigators are probing potential racial motives.

Sweden’s immigrant communities are on edge after the country’s worst mass shooting in decades, with 10 foreign-background victims gunned down inside a Swedish language school. Rickard Andersson, a 35-year-old Swedish national, carried out the cold-blooded massacre before turning the gun on himself, leaving more questions than answers.

Authorities insist there’s no clear ideological motive, yet the targeting of immigrants cannot be ignored. Victims from Syria, Iran, Eritrea, Lebanon, Somalia, and Bosnia had come to Sweden to build better lives. Instead, they were gunned down while studying Swedish and training for jobs—the very definition of integration under attack.

Somali Mother Among Victims in Sweden’s Deadliest School Massacre

Public outrage is growing as many suspect a hate crime, especially in a nation where far-right rhetoric has increasingly blamed immigrants for crime and economic struggles. The government, backed by the anti-immigration Sweden Democrats, has tightened migration policies, fueling division.

Authorities warn that Andersson was a loner, an unemployed man with legal firearms but no criminal record. Yet, the immigrant community is not convinced. Social worker Annie Boroian says foreigners already feel excluded, and this tragedy deepens that alienation.

The investigation could take a year, but for many, the fear is immediate. Sweden’s immigrant communities feel vulnerable, caught between rising nationalism, tightening policies, and now, deadly violence. The real question is—was this a lone act, or a symptom of something much darker brewing in Sweden?

Continue Reading

Top stories

Rights groups sue Trump administration over migrants transferred to Guantanamo

Published

on

Trump administration faces lawsuits over secretive migrant transfers to Guantanamo Bay, as rights groups warn of constitutional violations.

The Trump administration’s mass deportation blitz has taken a drastic and unprecedented turn—migrants detained on U.S. soil are now being shipped to Guantanamo Bay. With at least 30,000 beds being prepared at the offshore prison, Trump calls it a necessary step to remove “violent criminals”, but rights groups are calling it an unconstitutional detention scheme.

The ACLU and advocacy organizations have filed a lawsuit against the administration, demanding access to detainees who have been cut off from legal counsel. The case of Eucaris Carolina Gomez Lugo, who recognized her brother in handcuffs at Guantanamo after being accused of gang affiliations without trial, is a chilling example of how due process is vanishing under Trump’s immigration policies.

Trump’s crackdown aims to deport over a million migrants in a year, requiring 2,700 removals daily—but Guantanamo’s expansion suggests an even harsher playbook. Critics say it’s political theater, meant to showcase brute force over immigration policy, while sidestepping U.S. legal protections.

Historically, Guantanamo was used for Haitian and Cuban migrants stopped at sea—never for those detained on U.S. soil. But Trump is rewriting that rulebook, deploying a militarized solution to an immigration crisis that past presidents handled differently.

Obama and Biden, despite their “Deporter-in-Chief” reputations, never resorted to offshore detention facilities. Trump’s move mirrors Guantanamo’s dark history, where detainees were held for years without trial, subjected to torture, and stripped of basic rights.

With mass deportations underway and constitutional challenges mounting, Trump’s immigration war is reaching new extremes—and Guantanamo is once again a battleground in America’s fight over human rights, security, and the rule of law.

Continue Reading

Most Viewed

You cannot copy content of this page