U.S. Secretary of State Blinken emphasizes the need for stronger international cooperation to counter ISIS’s potential resurgence amid Middle Eastern conflicts.

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken has issued a stark warning about the potential for ISIS (Daesh) to exploit the volatile conditions in the Middle East to regain influence. Speaking at the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS ministerial meeting in Washington, D.C., Blinken urged international partners to intensify their efforts in maintaining security, particularly in Iraq and Syria, where ISIS remains a persistent threat.

Blinken stressed the importance of addressing the current instability:

“This is a moment of enormous volatility in the Middle East… it’s more important than ever that we enhance our efforts to strengthen security and stability, including in Iraq and Syria, and prevent extremists like ISIS from exploiting conflict in the region for their own benefit.”

The meeting followed the U.S. announcement that the military mission against ISIS in Iraq will conclude by the end of September 2025. Blinken indicated that discussions would center on transitioning operations in Iraq, ensuring that the Iraqi government takes on increased responsibility for preventing ISIS from reclaiming territory.

“In return, our Iraqi partners will assume greater responsibility for ensuring that Daesh/ISIS cannot protect territory within Iraq’s borders.”

As the U.S. prepares to scale back its direct military involvement in Iraq, Blinken underscored the need for sustaining security partnerships and assisting Baghdad in managing the threat.

While the U.S. plans to reduce its military presence in Iraq, Blinken made clear that counterterrorism operations in Syria would continue “as long as needed.” In Syria, ISIS still controls small pockets of territory, especially in the northeast, where the situation remains complex due to the presence of other militant groups and the ongoing humanitarian crisis.

Blinken also highlighted the importance of addressing the repatriation of foreign fighters and their families, currently held in detention camps in Syria, as a key component of preventing the resurgence of extremism:

“The repatriation of foreign fighters and their families is the only durable solution to the humanitarian and security crisis in northeast Syria.”

The Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS, formed in 2014, comprises nearly 87 countries and organizations dedicated to eradicating ISIS in Iraq and Syria. Representatives gathered to discuss the next steps in countering the extremist group, with key issues including long-term security partnerships and coordination between coalition members. Türkiye, a crucial partner in the region, was represented by Deputy Foreign Minister Nuh Yilmaz.

As conflicts across the Middle East, including the wars in Gaza and Lebanon, present opportunities for ISIS to rebuild its network, the U.S. and its coalition partners face the challenge of preventing the group from exploiting the chaos for recruitment, fundraising, and territorial gains.

As the coalition shifts its strategy, the question remains whether the Iraqi government can effectively assume the mantle of leadership in the fight against ISIS. Additionally, the ongoing instability in Syria complicates efforts to fully eradicate ISIS, as regional power struggles and the influence of non-state actors contribute to a highly fragmented security landscape.

The Biden administration has been vocal about its intention to prevent a broader resurgence of ISIS, but the upcoming transition in Iraq, combined with volatile conditions across the region, means that the road ahead is uncertain. Maintaining international cooperation and addressing the long-term socio-political drivers of extremism will be critical in ensuring that the efforts to defeat ISIS are sustained.

The ministerial meeting underscored the fragility of security gains in Iraq and Syria and the ongoing need for multilateral efforts to prevent ISIS from taking advantage of regional chaos. With the U.S. scaling back military operations in Iraq by 2025, the focus will shift to building local capacities and ensuring that the Iraqi government can prevent ISIS from resurging. Meanwhile, ongoing counterterrorism efforts in Syria and the repatriation of foreign fighters remain crucial to addressing both the humanitarian and security challenges posed by ISIS.

A Region Gripped by Instability

The Sahel, a vast and volatile region south of the Sahara Desert, has been besieged by a surge in extremist violence over recent months, culminating in unprecedented attacks that highlight the growing capabilities of Islamist militant groups. In early September, jihadist militants targeted Bamako, Mali’s capital, for the first time in nearly a decade, raising alarm over the expanding reach of insurgents in the region. Just weeks earlier, over 100 civilians and soldiers were killed in a brutal assault in Burkina Faso, underscoring the relentless violence that has ravaged the region.

For more than a decade, the Sahel has been engulfed in a crisis marked by extremist insurgencies, political instability, and military coups. Mali, Niger, and Burkina Faso—three nations central to the Sahel—are now governed by military juntas, each having seized power under the promise of restoring order and security. Yet, rather than stabilizing the region, the security landscape has deteriorated further.

According to the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project (ACLED), more than 3,000 civilians were killed in the first half of 2023 alone—a 25 percent increase from the previous six months. The violence stems not only from jihadist groups but also from state security forces accused of widespread abuses.

The Extremist Networks Driving the Violence

Two primary groups dominate the extremist landscape in the Sahel: Jama’at Nusrat al-Islam wal-Muslimin (JNIM), affiliated with al-Qaeda, and the Islamic State in the Sahel. While JNIM has become increasingly embedded in local communities, especially in Mali and Burkina Faso, the Islamic State’s operations are concentrated in the Lake Chad Basin, where it commands less political influence.

Analysts point out that JNIM’s integration with local insurgent factions has granted it broader acceptance among local populations, giving it an advantage over the more fragmented and less politically entrenched Islamic State faction.

“The local populations support [JNIM] more than IS-affiliated groups,” said Shaantanu Shankar, an analyst with the Economist Intelligence Unit. “They have integrated local rebel groups, which have close community ties.”

The insurgents, whether affiliated with al-Qaeda or the Islamic State, have inflicted terror on local populations through relentless attacks, kidnappings, and mass killings. These actions, rights groups say, likely constitute war crimes.

The Sahel’s governance crisis has worsened as the military regimes in Mali, Niger, and Burkina Faso have severed ties with their traditional Western allies. Upon taking power, these juntas withdrew from the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and formed the Alliance of Sahel States in September, aligning their security policies more closely with Russia while distancing themselves from France and the United States.

However, the introduction of Russia’s Wagner Group, a private military company, has done little to fill the security vacuum left by the withdrawal of Western forces. “There is a huge security vacuum after the withdrawal of the French and American military,” Shankar added. “The financial and logistical capacity of the Russian presence is limited.”

Compounding the instability is a deepening economic crisis. Economic discontent, particularly among the region’s youth, has helped fuel the rise of extremist groups. Militants have successfully recruited individuals from marginalized communities, where job opportunities are scarce, and government services are often nonexistent.

“There are very few opportunities for people in rural Sahel, especially the youth,” said Heni Nsabia, an analyst with ACLED. “People whose families and communities were targeted by state forces seek security, status, and vengeance through these groups.”

Financing Extremist Activities: A Diversified Strategy

Despite their links to al-Qaeda and the Islamic State, the Sahel’s militant groups primarily finance their operations through localized means. They impose taxes on local communities, control the region’s lucrative natural resources—particularly gold—and engage in cattle theft. Trafficking, particularly of narcotics, has also become a critical revenue stream, allowing militants to maintain their operations despite international counterterrorism efforts.

The illegal trade in human trafficking, especially across the Sahel’s porous borders, has also proven profitable, with analysts warning that turmoil in Libya and changes in Niger’s migration policies could exacerbate the crisis.

“The business model that these groups developed is very diversified,” Nsabia explained. “This is why it is difficult to destroy them economically. If you target one aspect, they have other sources of revenue.”

Experts warn that the situation in the Sahel is likely to deteriorate further. With the military juntas more focused on consolidating power than addressing the root causes of extremism, insecurity is expected to worsen.

“It’s a very volatile phase, and security is projected to get worse in the next two years,” Shankar observed.

The extremist threat is no longer confined to the Sahel. Militant groups have extended their reach into West Africa’s coastal nations, including Benin and Nigeria, raising concerns that more stable regions could soon face the same violence that has plagued the Sahel.

“It’s undeniable that things are getting worse,” Nsabia said. “We should not just be talking about the Sahel, but also about Benin and Togo, where militants have ventured inland by more than 200 kilometers.”

International Response: Limited but Crucial Support

In response to the escalating threat, the United States and European nations are intensifying efforts to bolster counterterrorism initiatives in West Africa’s coastal nations. Michael Langley, the head of U.S. Africa Command, indicated that Washington was working closely with Ivory Coast, Ghana, and Benin to recalibrate military assistance in the region.

Still, a significant challenge remains: access to accurate information. The military juntas have imposed severe restrictions on journalism, controlling the narrative and determining who is labeled a jihadist. In Mali, the government has branded ethnic Tuaregs—who have long fought for greater autonomy—as jihadis, even though only a portion of them are aligned with extremist groups.

As the Sahel grapples with increasing violence and political fragility, the international community faces the daunting task of supporting fragile governments while combatting the proliferation of extremist groups. With growing instability extending beyond the region’s borders, the consequences of the Sahel crisis may soon be felt across West Africa and beyond. Whether regional and global powers can prevent further destabilization remains uncertain, as extremist groups continue to exploit the vast and vulnerable terrain of the Sahel.

Somalia’s plot to destabilize Somaliland revealed — Egypt’s covert involvement fuels Al-Shabaab terrorism as the region faces an existential threat.

Somalia, propped up by its dark alliance with Egypt, is playing a deadly game—arming itself under the guise of security while setting the stage for a violent invasion of peaceful, democratic Somaliland. It’s a dangerous web of deceit, terrorism, and aggression. The stakes? Nothing less than the survival of Somaliland and the stability of the entire region.

Egypt’s clandestine operation to funnel weapons into Somalia is no longer a secret. Somalia’s so-called government, notorious for its ties to the terrorist group Al-Shabaab, is using Egypt as its puppet master to push its destructive ambitions. Just recently, the Al Hurreya 2, an Egyptian-flagged ship, covertly sailed through the treacherous waters of the Red Sea, carrying a lethal cargo of advanced weapons—rocket launchers, mortars, and armored vehicles. This shipment, destined for Somalia’s capital Mogadishu, didn’t happen by accident. It’s part of a calculated, long-term plan designed to destabilize Somaliland and arm Al-Shabaab terrorists to the teeth.

While the world is distracted by other global crises, Somalia, backed by Egypt’s military power, is preparing for a massive offensive against Somaliland. This move isn’t about securing borders or fighting terrorism—it’s about wiping out Somaliland’s thriving, democratic society. The question is: Will the world stand by and watch?

Somalia has long been home to the bloodthirsty Al-Shabaab, a terrorist organization hell-bent on chaos and destruction. But make no mistake, this is no rogue element. Al-Shabaab thrives under the very government that pretends to oppose it. Somalia has not only tolerated but actively nurtured this group, allowing it to spread its reign of terror across the Horn of Africa.

Now, armed with advanced Egyptian weaponry, the Somali government and Al-Shabaab stand ready to turn their guns on Somaliland. This is not just about military conquest—it’s about exterminating a proud, independent nation that has stood as a beacon of democracy and stability in a volatile region.

What could Egypt gain from this covert operation? The answer is power. Egypt, desperate to secure its interests along the Nile and assert dominance in the region, is playing a dangerous game with Somali lives. It has poured billions into modern weaponry, and now those weapons are flowing straight into the hands of Somalia and Al-Shabaab terrorists. Under the guise of “military cooperation,” Egypt is turning Somalia into a proxy to extend its influence and distract from its own domestic troubles.

This isn’t just an alliance—this is a ticking time bomb. And when it explodes, it won’t just be Somaliland that suffers. The entire Horn of Africa could be set ablaze, destabilizing neighboring countries like Ethiopia, Eritrea, and Djibouti. Regional peace is hanging by a thread.

Somaliland, a nation that has fought back for its freedom since 1991, stands at a critical crossroads. It has reclaimed its independence, built democratic institutions, and fostered a peaceful society despite the chaos that surrounds it. Yet, today, Somaliland faces its gravest threat—an invasion by Somalia, bolstered by Egyptian firepower and Al-Shabaab’s terror tactics.

Somaliland is not Somalia. While Somalia has descended into lawlessness and terror, Somaliland has been a beacon of hope—a symbol of what is possible in Africa. But now, Somalia seeks to drag Somaliland into the abyss, using Egyptian weapons and Al-Shabaab’s ruthless fighters to tear down the walls of democracy that Somaliland has painstakingly built.

Where is the world? Where are the voices of justice and democracy that claim to stand against terrorism? Western powers have turned a blind eye, allowing Somalia and Egypt’s deadly alliance to go unchecked. Reports from Western intelligence agencies indicate they know about these secret shipments and the growing ties between Al-Shabaab and Egypt. Yet, they remain silent.

Somalilanders call upon the international community to act before it’s too late. The time has come for Somaliland to arm itself and defend its borders. We must stand ready to fight back against this cowardly alliance of Somalia, Egypt, and Al-Shabaab terrorists.

To the people of Somaliland: this is not a fight we sought, but it is one we will win. Our nation’s survival is at stake. Somalia and Egypt may try to use their military might to intimidate us, but we have something they will never have—freedom, democracy, and the unwavering will of our people.

The world cannot afford to ignore this ticking time bomb in the Horn of Africa. Somalia’s alliance with Al-Shabaab and Egypt is a direct threat to global security. Somaliland, a peaceful nation, is now on the brink of war because of this dangerous collaboration. Will the international community step in and prevent a catastrophe? Or will they, once again, wait until it’s too late?

The choice is clear—act now, or watch as another nation falls victim to the scourge of terrorism and foreign aggression. Somaliland will not go down without a fight. The world must decide whether it will stand with democracy and peace—or allow terror and tyranny to prevail.

This is the battle for Somaliland’s survival. The world is watching, and history will judge those who stand idly by.

Former National Security Advisor: Al-Shabab as Somalia’s Defense Against Ethiopia

Somaliland Must Postpone November Elections to Defend Against Escalating Terrorist Threats from Lasanod

Somaliland Sounds the Alarm: Rising Al-Shabaab-Houthi Alliance Threatens Regional Stability

Rising Extremism in Africa: A Looming Threat to the U.S. and Its Allies

Islamic State’s Somalia Branch Gains Ground: A Threat That Can’t Be Ignored

Exploring the Surge of Jihadist Activity and the Shadows of Political Chaos Transforming the Sahel into a Launchpad for Global Terrorism

In the heart of the Sahel, where parched earth meets a turbulent history, West Africa is evolving into the world’s most dangerous nexus of terrorism. Countries previously thought to be stable, like Senegal and Niger, are now grappling with a terrifying surge in violence as jihadist groups exploit the chaos and despair that have taken root in the region. Fueled by the spread of Wahhabist ideology and acts perpetrated by radical offshoots such as Boko Haram, the situation is spiraling out of control.

Just weeks ago, a brazen attack in Mali’s capital, Bamako, shattered what little semblance of peace remained. Armed militants struck just before dawn, targeting a police academy and the airport, leaving a grim toll of lives lost and an unmistakable message of power. This latest assault is not just an isolated incident; it symbolizes a tragic evolution of jihadist influence: they are no longer confined to rural backwaters but are now striking where power and authority reside.

Battered by the headlines of wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, the crisis in the Sahel has been relegated to the shadows. However, make no mistake—the consequences are profound. According to the U.N.’s International Organization for Migration, the route to Europe via West African coastal nations has seen a staggering 62% increase in migrant arrivals this year, largely driven by the escalating violence in the Sahel.

As desperate families flee conflict and strife, the longstanding tide of migration puts pressure on the already polarizing political climate in Europe, coinciding with the rise of far-right anti-immigrant parties.

This is a critical moment—a boiling cauldron of conflicts compounded by climate change—forcing people from their homes. The International Federation of the Red Cross warns of a rising influx of women and families driven by the dual threats of violence and environmental changes. In Burkina Faso, terrorist acts are now reaching apocalyptic proportions, with jihadists massacring civilians in broad daylight.

As the Sahel fractures further, experts speculate darkly about the future. Caleb Weiss, a prominent analyst, warns that the failing regimes in Mali, Niger, and Burkina Faso could soon give rise to “jihadist states” or worse. With Western military powers withdrawing support, these countries are trading traditional alliances for partnerships with mercenaries from Russia’s Wagner Group—a shift that does little to quell the violence.

In the chaotic aftermath, the global implications of a Sahel overrun by jihadists become startlingly clear. General Michael Langley of U.S. Africa Command articulates a lingering worry: “These organizations harbor aspirations of attacking the United States.” Although they have yet to find the means to strike directly in Europe or America, the mere thought of a fortified base of operations in the Sahel is chilling.

In this landscape of fear and oppression, terrorists provide a semblance of order through coercive tactics and the offering of basic services, preying on the disenfranchised. A young escapee from Mali recounts his harrowing experience under their rule, illustrating the depth of manipulation and fear governing this chaotic environment.

While European nations squabble over how to respond to the growing crisis, the impact of West Africa’s turmoil is undeniable. A tipping point is approaching, where a confluence of grievances, failures, and radicalization could propel the Sahel onto the global stage as a formidable center of jihadist activity.

As the dust settles from a series of catastrophic events, the world watches with bated breath, wondering if global leaders will awaken to the urgent need for a cohesive strategy to combat the rising tide of terrorism, or if they will allow the Sahel to further descend into barbarism—a concept so terrifying it could shape our future geopolitical landscape for decades to come.

Somali Government Urged to Act as Dangerous Militant Collaboration Emerges Across the Gulf of Aden

The threat is real, and it’s growing. Somaliland’s Minister of Internal Affairs, Mohamed Kahin Ahmed, has delivered a stark warning: a new and dangerous alliance between al-Shabaab and the Houthi rebels in Yemen is forming—and it could set the region ablaze. Speaking to Al Arabiya TV, Minister Kahin urged the Somali government to step up and prevent this partnership from gaining traction. “The Somali government must take control of the situation and prevent further cooperation between these groups,” Kahin stressed, his voice filled with concern for regional security.

Situated along the volatile Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden, the region is already teetering under the weight of militancy and piracy. An al-Shabaab-Houthi alliance would only add fuel to the fire, threatening to disrupt international trade routes and plunge the region into chaos. Somaliland is urging the international community to intervene before it’s too late, admitting it cannot handle such a grave security threat on its own.

But how did this unholy alliance come to be? After all, al-Shabaab, the Somali-based extremist group, and the Houthis—Iran-backed rebels from Yemen—couldn’t be more different ideologically. Al-Shabaab is a Sunni militant group with deep roots in Wahhabi extremism, while the Houthis practice Zaydi Shiism, a branch of Islam that al-Shabaab has long rejected. Yet, they find themselves united by a common enemy: the United States.

Recent U.S. intelligence reports paint a disturbing picture. Discussions between Houthi leaders and al-Shabaab have reportedly centered around the transfer of weapons. These aren’t just small arms or ammunition but potentially sophisticated weaponry, including drones and ballistic missiles, tools that could wreak havoc across the region. The possibility that Iran is facilitating this weapons transfer is being investigated, though U.S. officials are cautious about directly implicating Tehran at this stage.

As the situation escalates, the U.S. has been quick to sound the alarm across the Horn of Africa and the Middle East. American officials are in constant talks with African nations, warning them of the destabilizing effects this collaboration could have. One senior U.S. administration official noted, “This is being viewed with considerable seriousness. It would further destabilize an already volatile region.”

The potential alliance could also undermine fragile peace efforts, particularly the informal ceasefire between the Houthis and Saudi Arabia, which has held since 2022. The Houthis, under pressure from Iran, have largely avoided escalating their conflict in Yemen but may be eyeing Somalia as a new front. For al-Shabaab, access to Houthi weapons could be a game-changer, offering the group the firepower to push deeper into contested territories and target U.S. military assets in the region.

There is much uncertainty about what comes next. But one thing is clear: if al-Shabaab and the Houthis succeed in formalizing their partnership, it could transform the security dynamics across the Red Sea and Horn of Africa—with potentially devastating consequences.

Will the Somali government take the decisive action needed to thwart this growing threat? Or will al-Shabaab and the Houthis be allowed to forge a new chapter of violence and extremism in the region?

New Footage Reveals the Houthis’ Dangerous Tactics in the Red Sea

Russia Arming Houthis: A New Threat to Somaliland’s Security and Global Internet

Former National Security Advisor: Al-Shabab as Somalia’s Defense Against Ethiopia

Houthi threat triggers surge in pirate attacks off Somalia coast

Rising Extremism in Africa: A Looming Threat to the U.S. and Its Allies

Houthi Attacks in Red Sea Trigger Somali Piracy Resurgence, Says EU Naval Chief

Withdrawal of U.S. Forces From Niger Shifts Counterterrorism Efforts to Neighboring Nations Amid Rising Extremist Threats.

The U.S. military’s withdrawal from Niger, following the country’s July 2023 coup, has forced a recalibration of American counterterrorism strategies across West Africa. Major General Kenneth Ekman, former AFRICOM director for West Africa, highlighted in a recent interview the strategic importance of Niger, the repercussions of losing this key partner, and how the U.S. is adapting to the growing extremist threat in the Sahel.

After the coup, the U.S. repositioned about 1,100 troops, drones, and other equipment across the region. While American forces no longer operate from Niger’s key bases, the U.S. is forging new partnerships in neighboring countries, such as Cote d’Ivoire, Benin, and Chad. Ekman emphasized the importance of these relationships, particularly as violent extremist organizations (VEOs) continue to spread through the region, threatening both local and global security.

Niger was the U.S.’s primary foothold in the Sahel, a region plagued by extremist violence, primarily from groups affiliated with ISIS and al-Qaeda. Ekman referred to the withdrawal as a “strategic setback” but highlighted that the U.S. remains committed to supporting regional security efforts.

With American forces now positioned in countries like Benin and Cote d’Ivoire, Ekman explained the shift from an “inside-out” strategy—where forces operated within Niger to counter VEOs in the surrounding Sahel region—to an “outside-in” approach. This new strategy involves deploying intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) assets and special forces teams in neighboring nations to monitor and respond to extremist activities.

Sanctions imposed on Niger’s military junta have further complicated any immediate return to the previous level of cooperation. Ekman noted that the future of U.S.-Niger relations depends largely on the junta’s actions and whether Niger seeks to rebuild its partnership with the U.S. However, the broader security situation in the Sahel is rapidly deteriorating, with extremist attacks becoming more lethal since the coup.

Ekman expressed concerns that losing Niger as a partner has hindered intelligence-sharing and collaboration, vital tools in combating VEOs in the region. Despite this, he remains cautiously optimistic that relationships with other West African nations will help fill the gap left by Niger.

The violent extremist threat in West Africa continues to evolve. The region is becoming increasingly opaque, with terrorist groups like Jama’at Nasr al-Islam wal Muslimin (JNIM) and ISIS elements both competing and collaborating. Ekman warned that the lack of access and ISR makes it more challenging to assess the groups’ intentions, especially regarding potential external operations.

As the U.S. and its partners adapt to these challenges, Ekman emphasized the need for continued intelligence-sharing and military cooperation to address the region’s rising security concerns. While the U.S. presence in Niger is significantly reduced, the repositioning of forces in West Africa underscores Washington’s ongoing commitment to countering extremism in one of the world’s most volatile regions.

The U.S. military’s strategy in West Africa is now focused on leveraging partnerships with countries like Chad, Benin, and Cote d’Ivoire, where ongoing negotiations aim to balance U.S. assistance with local security priorities. With the situation in Niger still in flux, Ekman underscored that keeping “all options on the table” will be essential for addressing both immediate and long-term threats posed by VEOs in the Sahel.

As violent extremist groups continue to exploit instability across West Africa, the U.S. faces the challenge of maintaining influence in a region critical to global security, even as it navigates the complex political realities left in the wake of the Niger coup.

Despite its Smaller Size, IS-Somalia’s Financial Power and Global Reach Make It a Major Player in Terrorism

The Islamic State’s Somalia affiliate is making waves far beyond its modest size. According to a new report by the International Crisis Group (ICG), IS-Somalia is not only expanding its reach within Africa but also funneling funds to terrorist networks as far afield as Afghanistan.

While IS-Somalia’s impact within Somalia is relatively muted compared to its larger rival, al Shabaab, which dominates significant swathes of the country and is linked to al Qaeda, its role in the broader Islamic State network is far from negligible. The ICG report reveals that IS-Somalia has become a critical node in the Islamic State’s financial and operational machinery, largely due to its impressive revenue generation capabilities.

The affiliate has raised an estimated $6 million since 2022, primarily through extortion and the exploitation of natural resources. The group controls operations in Puntland’s seaport city of Bosasso and engages in small-scale gold mining in the Bari region. This financial prowess has enabled it to support various Islamic State affiliates across Africa and even contribute to operations in Afghanistan.

Despite its financial clout, IS-Somalia remains relatively small, with around 500 fighters entrenched in the rugged Cal Miskaat mountains of Puntland. Its limited territorial control and a sharp decrease in attacks—down from about 60 in 2019 to less than a dozen this year—underscore its constrained operational capacity. Nevertheless, the group’s resilience and ability to attract foreign fighters from Kenya, Tanzania, Ethiopia, Yemen, and beyond, including recent arrests of Moroccans, highlight its growing influence.

The group was founded by Abdulkadir Mumin, who defected from al Shabaab nine years ago. His leadership has expanded IS-Somalia’s regional command, as Islamic State’s central leadership has directed affiliates in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Mozambique to report to him. Mumin himself was targeted by a U.S. airstrike in May but continues to operate, thanks in part to the group’s strategic positioning and the factional politics that plague Somali governance.

The Puntland government’s struggle to combat IS-Somalia is exacerbated by longstanding interclan animosities and political disputes between Puntland and Somalia’s central government. These internal divisions have hindered effective counter-terrorism efforts. The ICG report suggests that a unified front, alongside efforts to address local grievances and encourage defections, is crucial for diminishing IS-Somalia’s influence.

As IS-Somalia continues to leverage its financial capabilities and strategic alliances, the international community and regional stakeholders must confront this emerging threat with a coordinated approach. Ignoring or underestimating IS-Somalia’s growing power could lead to more severe and widespread consequences, not only for Somalia but for global security as a whole.

As America commemorates 9/11’s 23rd anniversary, political figures and citizens grapple with the enduring impact of the attacks amidst today’s heated debates and renewed resolve.

On the 23rd anniversary of the September 11 attacks, America found itself at a crossroads of reflection and political drama. On a crisp September morning reminiscent of that fateful day in 2001, the nation paused to remember the nearly 3,000 lives lost in a tragedy that forever altered the course of history.

At Ground Zero in New York, the scene was both somber and strikingly familiar. Relatives of the victims, their grief still palpable, gathered at the memorial. The air was filled with the echoes of names being read aloud—an annual ritual that transforms personal loss into collective memory. Among those present were President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris, along with former President Donald Trump. In a rare moment of unity, the political rivals, fresh from a contentious debate in Philadelphia, exchanged a brief handshake and polite words.

But this year’s commemoration was not just a solemn remembrance. It unfolded against a backdrop of political turbulence and renewed national resolve. Biden and Harris later traveled to Shanksville, Pennsylvania, to honor the brave passengers of Flight 93, who thwarted the hijackers’ plans and crashed the plane into a field rather than the intended target in Washington, D.C. Their journey then took them to the Pentagon, where the fourth hijacked plane crashed into the heart of America’s military might.

In his poignant statement, President Biden reflected on the resilience that emerged from the darkest hours. “On this day 23 years ago, terrorists believed they could break our will and bring us to our knees,” Biden said. “They were wrong. They will always be wrong. In the darkest of hours, we found light. And in the face of fear, we came together—to defend our country and to help one another. That is why terrorists targeted us in the first place: our freedom, our democracy, our unity.”

The president’s words, while evoking a shared sense of pride, also underscored the ongoing challenges of vigilance and security. “They failed. But we must remain vigilant,” Biden continued. “Today, our longest war is finally over. But our commitment to preventing another attack on our people never will be.”

As the bell tolled twice at the site of the World Trade Center, marking the moments when Flight 11 and then Flight 175 struck the Twin Towers, the significance of the day was unmistakable. A police bagpipe honor corps carried an American flag through the plaza, while top U.S. officials watched in reflective silence.

In a moving display of personal connection, Cathy Naughton, who lost her cousin Michael Roberts, a firefighter killed on 9/11, expressed the enduring pain and the need for remembrance. “It’s just so raw. We want to make sure people remember always and say the names always and never forget,” she said, her voice heavy with emotion.

Yet, beneath this solemnity, the political landscape remains fraught with tension. The day’s reflections were tinged with the recent and highly publicized presidential debate between Biden and Trump. Their interaction—cordial yet fleeting—served as a stark reminder of the polarized climate in which this anniversary is observed. The unity displayed at Ground Zero contrasted sharply with the ongoing partisan conflicts that dominate American politics.

Moreover, as the nation reflected on its past, the current political scene continued to stir controversy. The juxtaposition of remembrance with political maneuvering highlights the complex interplay between national grief and the realities of contemporary governance. The intensity of the 2024 election season looms large, overshadowing the collective pause for reflection with the ever-present specter of political strife.

In this charged atmosphere, the 23rd anniversary of 9/11 serves as a poignant reminder of both the profound losses endured and the enduring strength of the American spirit. As the nation grapples with its past and navigates its current challenges, the lessons of September 11 remain as relevant as ever. The call to remember and to remain vigilant is not just a historical reflection but a pressing imperative for the future.

As the day concluded, the blend of personal grief, political dynamics, and national resilience left an indelible mark on the American consciousness. The memories of September 11, 2001, continue to shape the nation’s identity and its response to the challenges of today, underscoring the enduring legacy of that fateful day.