Connect with us

Top stories

US Supports Two Permanent UN Security Council Seats for Africa

Published

on

The US advocates for two permanent UN Security Council seats for Africa and a rotating seat for small island states, aiming to mend frayed relations and counter Chinese influence.”

The United States is set to unveil a proposal that could transform the United Nations Security Council (UNSC). U.S. Ambassador to the U.N., Linda Thomas-Greenfield, will announce a groundbreaking plan to award two permanent Security Council seats to African states and introduce a rotating seat for small island developing nations. This bold initiative, expected to be revealed on Thursday, signals a significant U.S. effort to mend strained ties with Africa and assert influence in the Pacific amid rising Chinese dominance.

Thomas-Greenfield’s announcement reflects a broader strategy by the Biden administration to address longstanding grievances from developing nations. Many African countries have expressed frustration with Washington’s support for Israel’s actions in Gaza, and small island states have been vocal about the impacts of climate change. The proposed reforms aim to address these concerns by giving Africa a stronger voice on the UNSC and recognizing the unique challenges faced by island nations.

Advertisement

In her remarks, Thomas-Greenfield is expected to emphasize that this move is not just a gesture but a potential cornerstone of President Joe Biden’s foreign policy legacy. The push for permanent African seats and a rotating position for island states is an extension of the U.S.’s longstanding support for expanding permanent membership to include countries like India, Japan, and Germany.

The current Security Council, with its five permanent members—Russia, China, France, the U.S., and the U.K.—has long been criticized for its outdated structure and lack of representation for developing nations. The council, initially formed in 1945 with 11 members, was expanded to 15 in 1965, yet its core membership and veto power have remained unchanged. U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has echoed calls for reform, citing the need for a council that better reflects today’s geopolitical realities.

The challenge of reforming the UNSC is formidable. Any modification requires amending the U.N. Charter, a process demanding approval from two-thirds of the General Assembly, including the current veto-wielding members. Despite years of debate, concrete progress has been elusive, with recent geopolitical tensions further complicating the issue.

Advertisement

Thomas-Greenfield’s proposal aims to break the deadlock by pushing for negotiations on a draft text to amend the Charter. She argues that the current system fails to leverage Africa’s substantial contributions and insights into global security issues, particularly given the continent’s vulnerability to crises and conflicts. Similarly, the rotating seat for small island states is framed as crucial for addressing global challenges like climate change, which disproportionately impact these nations.

The timing of this announcement is as strategic as it is symbolic. As the U.S. navigates a complex global landscape marked by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and China’s expanding influence, this proposal positions Washington as a reformist leader, willing to challenge the status quo. Yet, the success of this initiative remains uncertain, with potential resistance from established UNSC members and geopolitical rivalries adding layers of complexity to the reform process.

In essence, the U.S. proposal represents a high-stakes gamble in international diplomacy, reflecting both a desire to rectify historical imbalances and a strategic maneuver to reinforce American influence. As the debate unfolds, the world will watch closely to see if this ambitious plan can overcome entrenched interests and reshape the UNSC for a more equitable future.

Advertisement

Top stories

Al-Shabaab’s Resurgence Exposes Flaws in Somalia’s War Strategy

Published

on

Militant capture of Aadan Yabaal questions Mogadishu’s military momentum amid eroding public trust and fragile international support.

The fall of Aadan Yabaal to Al-Shabaab isn’t just a battlefield loss—it’s a strategic and psychological blow to the Somali government’s credibility. President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s attempt to reassure the nation that “momentum shifts” are part of war may ring hollow to a public that’s heard the same line since the early 2000s. After two years of claiming gains, how did the jihadists storm a symbolic stronghold with apparent ease?

Al-Shabaab’s capture of Aadan Yabaal shows the Somali military’s offensive was never as comprehensive or irreversible as claimed. Frontline forces remain underfunded and stretched thin. Tactical vacuums and inconsistent control of retaken towns are leaving doors wide open for ambushes. If elite units can’t hold strategic hubs like Aadan Yabaal, then what is really under government control?

Advertisement

President Mohamud’s warning about waning international support is an admission of dependency—Somalia’s war effort hinges more on foreign aid than national resolve. With US counterterrorism strikes declining, AMISOM rebranded into a lighter version, and donor fatigue mounting, the illusion of “progress” is rapidly dissolving. Al-Shabaab isn’t just surviving—it’s adapting, exploiting weaknesses, and regaining ground.

The president may plead for morale, but it’s morale in Mogadishu that’s collapsing. Every time Al-Shabaab plants its flag in a reclaimed town, it sends a louder message: Somalia’s government doesn’t have a monopoly on violence—or on legitimacy. Community militias like Ma’awisleey may be willing to fight, but they can’t hold ground without serious logistical backing. Without air support, intelligence coordination, and a functioning national army, this war will keep repeating itself.

If Somalia wants to avoid becoming a permanent failed state, its leaders must stop spinning failures into PR soundbites and start admitting the cracks in the system. The enemy is inside the walls—and still marching.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

EDITORIAL

Somaliland’s Political Class: Selling Out a Nation for Profit

Published

on

Somaliland’s greatest obstacle isn’t foreign policy — it’s internal corruption, nepotism, and betrayal from politicians who profit while the nation suffers. WARYATV exposes the rot.

While the people dream of recognition, their leaders cash in on betrayal.

Somaliland’s path to recognition has never been blocked by Mogadishu, Ethiopia, or even the UN. It has been sabotaged from within. Behind the speeches and flag-waving lies an elite class of politicians and businessmen who treat the nation not as a cause to fight for, but as a franchise to milk.

These men—most unelected, many unqualified—have spent decades playing the long game of stagnation. They talk sovereignty while banking silence. They chant patriotism while laundering public funds. And worst of all, they have created a system where anyone smart enough to challenge the decay is labeled a threat.

This is the intellectual apartheid of Somaliland: Educated minds are shunned, sidelined, and smeared because they expose what the ruling class desperately wants to hide—their fear of change, their fear of meritocracy, and their fear of losing control.

Advertisement

The result?

  • Corruption reigns unchecked.
  • Healthcare and education are abandoned.
  • National planning is a joke.
  • Recognition is sabotaged deliberately—because an internationally recognized state comes with rules and transparency, and that threatens the clan cartel currently in charge.

Somalilanders aren’t poor because of geography. They’re poor because the elite keep them that way. They’re told to wait, to pray, to believe in “diplomatic progress” while deals are cut behind closed doors and loyalty is bought, not earned. And the biggest betrayal? Business elites who actively oppose recognition, because they fear competition more than they love their flag.

Hadrawi warned us. Intelligence is punished. The thinkers, the visionaries, the honest ones—they are exiled, not by the world, but by their own people in power.

Somaliland isn’t failing because of external pressure. It’s failing because of internal cowardice. A nation hijacked by men who want the title of president, not the responsibility of statehood.

Advertisement

The people must stop idolizing thieves and start demanding truth. Somaliland’s dream is not dead—but it’s being strangled in silence.

Time to break the silence. 

Continue Reading

Analysis

America Pulls the Plug on Somalia: UN Funding Blocked, AUSSOM on the Brink

Published

on

Trump eyes embassy closures as US rejects UN plan to fund peacekeepers in Somalia — Mogadishu’s last lifeline in peril.

The US shocks the UN by rejecting funding for African Union forces in Somalia, just as Trump weighs closing the US Embassy in Mogadishu. With Al-Shabaab advancing and oil politics heating up, is Somalia doomed to implode?

The United States just signaled the collapse of Somalia’s last fragile security architecture — and it did so with chilling clarity. Washington has publicly rejected UN efforts to fund the African Union Stabilization Support Mission in Somalia (AUSSOM), effectively gutting any hope for predictable peacekeeping operations in a country teetering on the edge of collapse.

Advertisement

This isn’t just a bureaucratic snub — it’s a geopolitical death sentence for Somalia. Al-Shabaab militants are already testing the vacuum, launching a multi-pronged assault on Adan Yabaal, a key military base in Middle Shabelle. If confirmed, the town’s fall would mark the largest strategic loss since Somalia launched its offensive against terror in 2022.

UN Secretary-General António Guterres warned the Security Council: no funding, no peace. But the US—under Trump’s second-term posture—is slamming the door shut, labeling Somalia as unfit for a hybrid funding model under Resolution 2719. Diplomats are in a panic. Meanwhile, Trump is reportedly planning to close up to 30 diplomatic missions, with Mogadishu’s embassy topping the list.

Somalia’s response? Desperation disguised as diplomacy. The FGS is now peddling oil blocks in contested territories like Nugaal Valley. In a flashy announcement on X, Somalia’s ambassador to the US declared “Somalia is open for drilling,” targeting American firms with an offer it legally and militarily cannot secure.

Advertisement

Somalia’s Ambassador to the United States, Dahir Hassan Arab

The move comes after Somalia’s recognition of SSC-Khaatumo — a region still engulfed in the political wreckage of its war with Somaliland.

This isn’t about development. It’s about weaponizing recognition, resource manipulation, and fake sovereignty in a bid to win Trump’s favor and undermine Somaliland’s momentum.

But while Hargeisa builds forests and attracts foreign media praise, Mogadishu is drowning in debt, insurgency, and denial. The West is tuning out, and even the UN is losing patience. The US, once Somalia’s diplomatic oxygen, is now pulling the plug.

Somalia is not rising — it’s being unplugged.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Commentary

China Slaps Trump With Brutal Reality Check as Trade War Turns Global

Published

on

Chinese state media blasts Trump’s tariff war, accuses U.S. of freeloading on globalization while Xi strengthens Asian alliances.

China lashes out at Trump’s economic nationalism, accusing the U.S. of hypocrisy as global trade realigns. Rare earths, aircraft, and semiconductors are next in this economic war.

Beijing just turned up the heat—and made it personal.

Advertisement

China Daily, the official mouthpiece of the Chinese Communist Party, has delivered a scathing editorial aimed squarely at Donald Trump, telling him to “stop whining” and stop pretending the U.S. is a victim of global trade. “The U.S. is not getting ripped off by anybody,” it declared. “It has been taking a free ride on globalization for decades.”

The insult isn’t just rhetorical—it’s strategic. Trump’s aggressive tariff campaign, which now includes up to 145% duties on Chinese imports, has sparked the fiercest economic duel in decades. But China isn’t retreating. Instead, it’s choking U.S. exporters and fueling regional alliances that sideline Washington altogether.

Xi Jinping’s surprise regional tour, now overlapping with this tariff escalation, is no coincidence. Xi is quietly building what he calls a “strategic alliance of destiny” with Malaysia and ASEAN countries. Translation: Beijing is done playing by Trump’s rules. While the U.S. ratchets up tariffs and threatens new probes into semiconductors, pharma, and rare earths, China is reinforcing control of critical global supply chains.

Advertisement

The stakes? Massive. The Hong Kong postal service just banned packages to the U.S., Boeing deals are stalling, and Chinese firms are moving supply lines away from American manufacturers. Rare earth export bans are already shaking markets, and Beijing’s shadow diplomacy is redrawing global trade corridors.

Trump says, “The ball is in China’s court.” But Beijing just spiked it—with force.

Bottom line: This is not just a trade war. It’s a global economic realignment. And China’s message to the world? America’s time as the global economic sheriff is over—and it has only itself to blame.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Top stories

Russian Cult Leader Arrested in Argentina Over Child, Drugs, and Alleged Slavery

Published

on

Russian cult leader Konstantin Rudnev resurfaces in Argentina in bizarre case involving childbirth, possible sex trafficking, and guru-worship.
Arrested in Argentina, Russian cult figure Konstantin Rudnev is under investigation for coercion, drug crimes, and using childbirth for citizenship. Cult control or criminal empire?

Bariloche, Argentina — a place known for lakes and mountains — is now at the center of a spiraling international scandal.

In a twisted blend of cult fanaticism, immigration schemes, and alleged sexual slavery, Russian national Konstantin Rudnev, a self-proclaimed alien guru from Sirius and former convict, was arrested at the city’s airport following the suspicious birth of a child claimed to be his. That child may now be the key to exposing what authorities say could be a disturbing network of human trafficking cloaked in cult mysticism.

Advertisement

Hospital staff had already flagged the nervous, malnourished 22-year-old Russian woman and her handlers days before the birth. The moment her companions insisted the baby carry Rudnev’s surname — despite her visible fear and silence — alarms were triggered. Within days, Argentinian police swooped in. Rudnev was arrested along with over a dozen of his alleged disciples, all showing signs of cult control: malnourishment, secrecy, and submission.

The investigation, led by prosecutor Fernando Arrigo, is looking into whether Rudnev sought to exploit Argentina’s citizenship-by-birth policy. His alleged aim? Obtain legal status and protection by fathering a child in the country — possibly against the mother’s will.

But this is no ordinary immigration scam. Authorities recovered disturbing evidence from multiple rented properties: drug-laced pills, satellite communications, fasting punishments, and cells lined with floor mattresses and blacked-out windows — all hallmarks of coercive cult behavior.

Advertisement

Rudnev’s resume reads like dystopian fiction: convicted in 2013 for rape, drug crimes, and running a cult that stripped people of their autonomy, he told followers he was sent by aliens to save humanity. His book The Way of the Fool mocked jobs, families, and logic — encouraging complete submission.

Now, Rudnev is in custody, but the shadow of his cult still lingers. Were the followers victims or willing disciples? Was the newborn a passport, a symbol, or something darker?

If Argentina’s probe reveals that Rudnev resurrected his Russian cult to traffic women and abuse citizenship laws, this will be more than a bizarre spiritual scam — it will be one of the most chilling cross-border cult cases in recent memory.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Top stories

Trump’s Second Term: Speed, Shock, and a Nation Struggling to Keep Up

Published

on

From mass firings to trade wars and geopolitical whiplash, Trump 2.0 is chaos on steroids—and the global fallout has just begun.
Trump’s second term is moving faster than Washington, Wall Street, or Main Street can absorb. Tariffs, purges, and reversals are fueling confusion, economic anxiety, and global instability. 

“Move fast and break things” isn’t just Trump’s method—it’s now U.S. policy.

In his second term, President Donald Trump has stormed out of the gate like a man racing against time—and reality. From slapping 145% tariffs on China to firing thousands of federal workers by weekend email, Trump is governing with the urgency of a president who knows the clock is ticking. With GOP control of Congress and midterms looming, he’s pressing executive power to its constitutional limits—and maybe beyond.

Advertisement

The results? Chaos, confusion, and contradiction.

Trump’s team has reversed itself multiple times on major issues: trade with China, tech tariffs, deportations, and economic messaging. Even his own allies are scrambling to understand what policy applies on any given day. Canada, burned by steel and aluminum tariffs, says it has “no idea what’s actually been lifted.” Inside the U.S., small business owners like Mark Overbay are trying to plan pricing around a policy that changes with Trump’s tweets.

The “panic index” is spiking. Consumer confidence is collapsing. Supply chains are disoriented. Retirement funds are bleeding again. Even Social Security callers are getting busy signals at record rates as agencies buckle under hasty mass firings.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, Trump’s ambitions have no ceiling. In just 100 days, he’s tried to end the Russia-Ukraine war, restart Iran nuclear talks, annex Greenland, punish Canada, rebuild U.S. factories, and turn Gaza into a luxury resort.

This is not governance—it’s global whiplash.

“There’s no method. No strategy. Just raw speed and spectacle,” says one Canadian diplomat. Judge James Bredar slammed the firings: “Move fast? Fine. Break things? Not the law.”

Advertisement

But Trump’s allies say that’s exactly the point. He doesn’t want to govern slower. He wants revenge, legacy, and transformation—at warp speed.

Whether the system—and the world—can withstand that pressure? That’s the real test of Trump 2.0.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Top stories

Trump’s Iran Gamble: Talks May Backfire, Strengthen Tehran’s Terror Regime, Warns INSS Expert

Published

on

Trump’s “premature optimism” in nuclear talks could help Iran supercharge its arsenal and destabilize the Middle East, Israeli security expert says.  

Dr. Benny Sabti of INSS warns that Trump’s direct talks with Iran may embolden the regime, accelerate its nuclear ambitions, and weaken Israel’s security edge. 

Is Trump walking into a trap with Tehran? That’s the warning from Dr. Benny Sabti, a top Iran analyst at Israel’s Institute for National Security Studies (INSS), who is sounding the alarm over Washington’s newest nuclear diplomacy push with the Islamic Republic.

Advertisement

In an exclusive with Maariv, Sabti torched President Trump’s “premature optimism,” calling it not only a diplomatic blunder but a strategic risk to Israel, Saudi Arabia, and the broader Middle East. “You don’t call talks successful after two hours,” Sabti fumed. “You’re signaling weakness—and Iran knows how to exploit that.”

The core concern: Trump may be laying the groundwork for a return to the very nuclear deal he pulled out of in 2018, without full dismantlement, without iron-clad inspections, and with potential sanctions relief that could flood Iran’s economy with foreign currency. That, Sabti warns, would revive the regime—and bankroll its terror proxies.

While Iran plays hardball, the U.S. still hasn’t eased sanctions, but the regime senses a win. “They’re calculating,” Sabti said. “Partial relief is enough to reactivate Iran’s global trade machine. Once that happens, there’s no turning back. You’re not weakening Iran—you’re rescuing it.”

Advertisement

Even more dangerous is the false theater unfolding in Iran’s parliament, which Sabti dismisses as staged political drama. “There’s no real disagreement in Tehran,” he warned. “It’s all for show. The regime isn’t compromising—it’s stalling.”

Sabti also took aim at Trump’s reliance on Oman as mediator, noting the sultanate’s long history of cozy ties with Tehran. “You can’t win a war of pressure if your middleman is working both sides,” he said.

Bottom line? Sabti doesn’t believe diplomacy will stop Iran’s nuclear ambitions. “You have to go all in—sanctions, sabotage, even military options. This ‘a little here, a little there’ approach? It’s suicide.”

Advertisement

And for Israel? “If the Iranians believe they’ve outplayed the Americans, they will sprint toward the bomb. And we’ll all pay for it.”

 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Top stories

Elon Musk just planted his digital flag in Mogadishu

Published

on

Elon Musk’s satellite internet service gains access to Somalia, raising questions over digital sovereignty, censorship—and who controls Africa’s skies.
Starlink officially enters Somalia with government blessing. But behind the tech deal lies a wider digital arms race, from Mogadishu to Hargeisa, with Elon Musk in the spotlight.

Today, the Somali National Communications Authority granted Starlink a license to operate across the country. The ceremony, attended by senior Starlink executives Ryan Goodnight and Micaela Pawlak, marks a major shift in Somalia’s digital infrastructure—bringing Musk’s low-orbit satellite network into one of the world’s most fragmented telecom environments.

But behind the smiles and satellite promises, bigger questions loom.

Advertisement

Starlink’s arrival isn’t just about faster YouTube in Galkayo—it’s a strategic win for the Somali federal government, allowing it to expand digital reach even into regions like Las Anod and the Somaliland frontier, where current infrastructure is weak or controlled by regional authorities. Could Starlink be used as a digital tool in Somalia’s internal conflicts?

Somaliland, which has fiercely defended its telecommunications independence, may now find itself at a crossroads. Will Hargeisa push back or seek its own Starlink deal to avoid being digitally boxed out?

And then there’s Musk. The billionaire’s earlier jab at South Africa—claiming Starlink was blocked there because he’s “not Black”—has reignited controversy about race, regulation, and ownership in Africa’s telecom future.

Advertisement

Somalia, meanwhile, is already wired with fiber-optic undersea cables. But Starlink gives Mogadishu something fiber can’t: sky control—in hard-to-reach regions, remote districts, and frontline zones.

This isn’t just internet access. It’s information dominance.

With this license, Somalia gains digital reach. But Musk? He gains a foothold in yet another volatile but high-stakes market—where bandwidth may soon become a new form of battlefield leverage.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Most Viewed

error: Content is protected !!