Somalia’s Mask Slips: A Terrorist Sympathizer’s War on Somaliland’s Destiny

The tension surrounding Somalia’s Foreign Minister Ahmed Moalim Fiqi is thickening as the UAE grows more vocal in its discontent. Fiqi, already infamous for his involvement in the  2024 assassination of UAE military personnel, has crossed a dangerous line. His latest verbal attack on the UAE over the presence of Somaliland’s President Abdirahman Irro at the World Governments Summit in Dubai is no more than a desperate act. But there’s something lurking beneath this diplomatic bluster—something Fiqi may come to regret.

Fiqi’s history with the UAE is stained with blood. As Somalia’s Interior Minister, he was allegedly linked to the brutal killing of Emirati officers, men who were sent to aid Somalia in its fight for stability. The UAE hasn’t forgotten this betrayal. Yet, Fiqi’s nerve to lash out at the Emirates, in the face of their overwhelming aid and investment in Somalia, speaks volumes about his audacity, or perhaps, his ignorance of the UAE’s reach and resolve. The ghosts of those slain officers are not easily forgotten.

For Somalilanders and their allies, Fiqi’s behavior represents more than just a political snub—it’s a reminder of Somalia’s disregard for justice. His role in enabling Al-Shabaab sympathizers within his cabinet has turned Somalia into a breeding ground for terrorism. And now, the UAE finds itself with a critical choice: will they continue to allow Fiqi’s arrogance to go unpunished, or will they take decisive action?

For Somaliland, this isn’t just a matter of diplomacy—it’s about survival. While Mogadishu’s government falters, Somaliland thrives, and the UAE has become its trusted partner. Fiqi’s attacks on Somaliland only further reveal his desperation and irrelevance in the face of real progress. The UAE’s next move could be seismic. Will they target Fiqi and hold him accountable for his bloody legacy? Somaliland may be the key to tipping the scales of justice in this increasingly volatile region.

Conservative leader Friedrich Merz faces tough coalition talks after Germany’s national election results.

Germany’s conservatives won the national election, with Friedrich Merz’s conservative CDU/CSU bloc securing 28.5% of the vote. However, the fragmented results left the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) in second place with 20.5%, setting the stage for challenging coalition talks.

Despite winning, Merz faces a complex political landscape. His bloc’s poor performance, marking its second-worst post-war result, means coalition talks could take months, with the need for one or more smaller parties to form a majority. Some parties, like the AfD, which experienced a surge in support, have rejected working with Merz’s conservatives.

Merkz, who has no previous office experience, also set his sights on pushing for a stronger, more independent Europe. He criticized the U.S. for interfering in Germany’s political matters during the campaign and made clear his intent to prioritize European unity, suggesting NATO’s future might even be in question.

The Social Democrats (SPD), led by Chancellor Olaf Scholz, suffered a significant setback, marking their worst result since World War II, with just 16.5% of the vote. Scholz’s coalition had previously collapsed in 2023, leading to the snap elections.

With Merkel’s legacy in the rearview, Merz’s pro-market liberal stance, which includes equipping Ukraine with advanced missiles, marks a shift to the right, contrasting with the more cautious approach of his predecessor.

While Merz’s bloc holds the largest share of the vote, Germany’s future leadership will depend on whether a workable coalition can be formed from a divided parliament. Talks will determine whether Merz’s government can stabilize Germany, handle a weakened economy, and face international pressure, particularly from the U.S. and Russia. The election outcomes have ignited fears of stagnation and potential shifts in Germany’s economic outlook, given the rise of far-right politics and the strain on foreign investments.

The UK’s appointment of Charles Nicholas King as its new ambassador to Somalia signals a strategic move in its diplomatic approach to the Horn of Africa. With a background deeply rooted in conflict resolution, counterterrorism, and regional stability, King’s tenure will likely focus on supporting Somalia’s fight against al-Shabaab, strengthening Somali governance reforms, and enhancing UK-Somalia diplomatic and economic ties.

His previous experience leading the Gaza Taskforce, shaping British policy in Syria, Iraq, and Libya, and engaging in Levant and North African affairs positions him as a seasoned crisis diplomat—one who understands fragile states and counterterrorism strategies. This expertise will be crucial as Somalia continues its military campaign against al-Shabaab, expands state-building efforts, and seeks stronger international partnerships to stabilize the region.

As Somalia deepens its ties with Western allies, King’s leadership in Mogadishu could mark a pivotal shift in UK-Somalia relations, particularly in security cooperation, counter-extremism, and political development. His track record suggests a strong emphasis on diplomatic engagement, possibly with an increased role for the UK in Somalia’s security sector and regional stabilization initiatives.

The months ahead will reveal whether his appointment translates into tangible policy shifts—or whether British engagement remains largely advisory in Somalia’s fight for security and sovereignty.

Somaliland’s journey to statehood is a story of resilience, self-determination, and a legacy obscured by historical complexities. While the world recognizes July 1st, 1960, as Somalia’s independence, the truth is more nuanced, and Somaliland’s own declaration of independence on June 26th of that year plays a crucial, often overlooked role.

On that historic day, Sir Pierson Dixon, representing the Queen and the UK Council, submitted Somaliland’s independence paperwork to the United Nations. This act, grounded in international law and recognized by the UK, solidified Somaliland’s status as a sovereign nation. However, this initial recognition was short-lived. The narrative shifted when control fell into Italian hands, leading to a request for UN verification of Somalia’s independence on July 1st. This procedural move, however, did not negate Somaliland’s prior declaration.

The subsequent narrative of a unified “Somali Republic” rests on shaky legal ground. Crucially, no legally binding treaty of union between Somaliland and Somalia was ever signed, ratified, or registered with the UN, as required by Article 102 of the UN Charter. This absence of a legally sound union casts doubt on the legitimacy of Somalia’s claim to represent both territories. In fact, Somaliland’s parliament rejected the Act of Union in 1961, further underscoring the lack of legal consensus.  

Adding to the complexity, Somalia’s own path to recognized statehood is intertwined with Somaliland’s. Until June 30th, 1960, Somalia was under UN Trusteeship (Italian control), meaning it lacked the full sovereignty required to enter into a legally binding union. This raises questions about the validity of any subsequent claims of unification.

The implications of these historical and legal discrepancies are significant. Some argue that Somalia’s presence in Somaliland constitutes an illegal territorial occupation under Article 2(4) of the UN Charter, which prohibits expansion by force. Furthermore, the argument is made that Somalia’s international recognition, including its UN seat, is predicated on the misappropriation of Somaliland’s prior independent status. 

The narrative of a unified Somali Republic, promoted by Italy, the former colonial power, is seen by some as a form of neocolonialism. This manipulation of the UN process, it is argued, has allowed Somalia to maintain a fraudulent claim to international legitimacy, a claim that would be significantly weakened without Somaliland’s prior independent status.

Beyond the legal arguments, the historical record points to a procedural error at the UN level, an error with far-reaching consequences. This error, some argue, has not only denied Somaliland its rightful place on the world stage but has also contributed to ongoing conflicts and injustices, including the mass killings of the Isaaq clan, which some legal experts argue constitute genocide under the UN Genocide Convention.

Somaliland’s story is a testament to its people’s enduring quest for self-determination. It is a story that demands recognition, not only for the sake of historical accuracy but also for the pursuit of justice and lasting peace in the Horn of Africa. The call for protected status for the Isaaq clan and demands for compensation are a direct consequence of the historical injustices and the ongoing struggle for recognition. The pursuit of truth and accountability regarding these historical events remains central to Somaliland’s national identity and its aspirations for a secure and prosperous future.

After AUC Loss, Kenya’s Political Titan Faces Defining Choice—2027 Bid or Government Role?

Raila Odinga’s defeat in the African Union Commission (AUC) elections has reignited speculation over his next political move. For months, the veteran politician distanced himself from Kenya’s political scene, focusing on his continental bid. Now, with that chapter closed, the burning question is: what’s next for Raila?

One scenario suggests Raila could align with President William Ruto, capitalizing on growing calls to implement the National Dialogue Committee (NADCO) report, which proposes creating the position of Prime Minister. This move could secure him a powerful government role, offering influence without the bruising battle of a presidential contest. Pro-Ruto allies like Senator Samson Cherargei are already pushing for this constitutional amendment.

Alternatively, Raila could reassert dominance over ODM, setting the stage for another 2027 presidential bid. With ODM celebrating its 20th anniversary, party loyalists may pressure him to reclaim his leadership and mobilize opposition against Ruto’s administration. Figures like Kalonzo Musyoka and Peter Kaluma are already hinting at a revitalized opposition movement, positioning Raila as its figurehead.

Another possibility? Retirement. Some rivals, like Githunguri MP Gathoni Wamuchomba, argue that after this loss, Raila should bow out of politics and accept a state-backed retirement package. But history suggests otherwise—Raila thrives in political reinvention.

Whether he chooses reconciliation or resistance, his decision will reshape Kenya’s political landscape. If he embraces government cooperation, he could cement his legacy as a unifying statesman. But if he returns to opposition, he might once again lead a bruising battle toward 2027.

Why Djibouti’s Mahamoud Ali Youssouf Will Win the AU Chairmanship

German oligarchs helped Hitler rise to power—only to end up in concentration camps. A cautionary tale for today’s corporate elite?

History is ruthless to those who believe they can control tyrants. In the early 1930s, German industrialists saw Adolf Hitler as a useful tool—a blunt instrument they could wield to crush unions, eliminate political instability, and create a business-friendly dictatorship. They financed his rise, thinking they were playing him. Instead, Hitler played them, and many of these same elites later found themselves stripped of power, imprisoned, or even executed.

Alfred Hugenberg, a media mogul who opened the floodgates for Hitler’s chancellorship, was warned of his mistake. He dismissed the danger—until he found himself fleeing for his life. Siemens, once a pillar of German industry, was forced into the Nazi war machine, employing 80,000 slave laborers in a system of mass murder and totalitarian rule.

Corporate greed and political arrogance have always been a volatile mix. Business leaders bet on Hitler to stabilize the economy. Instead, he shattered every norm, wiped out rivals, and ruled by fear. Today’s billionaire class—whether in Silicon Valley, Wall Street, or beyond—should take heed. History has a way of swallowing those who think they can harness the storm. Will they learn, or will they repeat the fatal mistake of the oligarchs who thought they could control a monster?

Trump’s cost-cutting purge backfires as US nuclear safety agency scrambles to rehire fired experts amid security crisis.

The Trump administration’s aggressive purge of federal workers has backfired spectacularly, forcing the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) into a desperate scramble to rehire nuclear safety personnel it just fired. Among those axed were specialists overseeing America’s nuclear warhead stockpile, stationed at top-secret facilities. The layoffs, part of Trump’s broader cost-cutting drive, now pose a direct threat to US national security.

The chaos erupted after termination letters went out, axing key personnel from nuclear labs in Los Alamos, Livermore, and the Pantex Plant—critical sites for warhead development and maintenance. The NNSA, now struggling to contact and rehire these employees, admitted in an internal memo that they have “no good way” to reach them.

The firings stem from Trump’s push to gut the federal workforce, with over 10,000 layoffs last week alone. Energy officials warned of potential gaps in nuclear oversight, but the cuts proceeded anyway, adding to Trump’s growing list of controversial national security moves.

While Trump claims to want a global denuclearization push, his decision to cripple America’s nuclear security infrastructure is raising alarms. The fallout is already underway: a nuclear watchdog crisis, an embarrassed energy department, and a White House scrambling to contain yet another self-inflicted disaster. With nuclear safety on the line, America can’t afford another misstep.

EUNAVFOR Atalanta successfully recovers Yemeni vessel Al Najma after Somali pirates hijack the boat off the coast of Eyl.

The European Union Naval Force (EUNAVFOR) Atalanta swiftly responded to a pirate hijacking off the Somali coast, successfully recovering the Yemeni fishing vessel Al Najma. The attack, which took place in the Eyl district of the Nugal region, was described as an armed robbery at sea, marking a resurgence of piracy in the region.

Somali Piracy Resurfaces: Armed Raiders Seize Fishing Boat Off Horn of Africa

Atalanta’s rapid naval and air deployment led to the successful seizure of the vessel, ensuring the safety of all 12 crew members. According to official reports, the pirates abandoned the ship after looting valuables, leaving the crew unharmed but shaken.

With piracy in the Horn of Africa resurging amid regional instability, this latest incident underscores the ongoing threat posed by criminal networks operating in Somali waters. Despite years of international naval patrols suppressing large-scale piracy, the collapse of security structures onshore has allowed rogue elements to reemerge, threatening commercial and fishing vessels.

EUNAVFOR Atalanta continues to conduct operations to deter maritime threats, gathering intelligence on the latest attack. As instability in the Red Sea intensifies due to regional conflicts, the fight against piracy is once again at the forefront of global security concerns. The successful rescue of Al Najma signals Europe’s continued commitment to protecting international waters and ensuring the safety of maritime trade routes.