Commentary
Algerian Ultranationalist Influencers Spark Tensions with France

Arrests in France highlight the rise of incendiary rhetoric targeting Paris amid deteriorating relations with Algeria.
The arrest of several Algerian ultranationalist social media influencers in France over inciting violence and glorifying terrorism has put a spotlight on the complex and deteriorating relationship between the two countries. These influencers, some with hundreds of thousands of followers on platforms like TikTok, have amplified anti-French sentiment and targeted both French authorities and critics of the Algerian regime.
The tensions come against a backdrop of historic grievances rooted in Algeria’s bloody war of independence and France’s colonial legacy. Recent developments, including French President Emmanuel Macron’s support for Morocco’s autonomy plan for Western Sahara and criticism of Algeria’s detention of French-Algerian writer Boualem Sansal, have only deepened the rift.
Among those arrested was an Algerian influencer operating under the alias “zazouyoucef,” who allegedly glorified terrorism and targeted opponents of Algerian President Abdelmadjid Tebboune. With over 400,000 followers on TikTok before his account was removed, his inflammatory content exemplifies a growing trend of ultranationalist rhetoric among members of the Algerian diaspora. Another influencer, known as Mahdi B., had amassed over 800,000 followers before his arrest and subsequent sentencing for similar offenses.
The proliferation of these accounts, often broadcasting in Algerian Arabic, demonstrates their dual appeal to audiences within Algeria and across the Algerian diaspora in Europe. While the French government has refrained from explicitly accusing Algeria of orchestrating the campaign, officials acknowledge the potent influence of Algerian state-controlled media, which has a history of stoking anti-French sentiment.
The role of social media in amplifying nationalist fervor is a growing concern. The simplicity of the messages—often framed around Algerian nationalism—resonates widely, particularly among younger members of the diaspora who feel disconnected from both their host country and ancestral homeland.
“The nationalist craze in part of the Algerian diaspora is new,” said historian Benjamin Stora, who has extensively studied Franco-Algerian relations. This rise in nationalist sentiment is fueled not only by historical grievances but also by Algeria’s perception of betrayal following France’s shift on Western Sahara.
French officials are particularly alarmed by the large audiences these influencers command and the potential for such rhetoric to incite real-world violence. Although no documented acts of violence have been directly linked to the content, the French Interior Ministry has emphasized the need for vigilance.
The resurgence of anti-French rhetoric and the arrests of influencers come at a time when relations between France and Algeria are at a nadir. Macron’s decision to back Morocco’s Western Sahara autonomy plan was seen as a strategic move to strengthen ties with Morocco, one of the few remaining allies France has in North Africa, especially after its fallout with several Sahel nations.
In contrast, Algeria viewed this shift as a betrayal, exacerbating tensions that had already been heightened by disagreements over migration and the detention of critics like Sansal. Algeria’s state-controlled media, echoing the regime’s sentiments, has aggressively attacked France, accusing it of infringing on Algerian sovereignty and undermining its stability.
While French officials stop short of accusing the Algerian regime of directly orchestrating the online hate campaigns, they acknowledge the possibility of indirect encouragement or tacit approval. “The Algerian regime is extremely fragile, and the more fragile it is, the more it hits France,” a French diplomat noted.
France’s Algerian diaspora, estimated at over 2 million, occupies a unique position in this conflict. Many in the community feel caught between their ties to their ancestral homeland and their lived reality in France, where integration challenges and discrimination often fuel alienation. This dynamic makes the diaspora particularly susceptible to nationalist rhetoric amplified through social media.
However, the actions of ultranationalist influencers threaten to deepen divisions both within the diaspora and between France and Algeria. Critics argue that the focus on anti-French sentiment detracts from addressing pressing issues in Algeria, such as economic stagnation, governance challenges, and political repression.
The arrests in France signal an attempt to curb the spread of incendiary rhetoric, but they also underscore the difficulty of managing such a complex and deeply rooted issue. As France and Algeria navigate this turbulent period, the role of social media in shaping public opinion and fueling diplomatic tensions cannot be overlooked.
Ultimately, resolving these tensions will require not only addressing the immediate issue of online hate campaigns but also fostering a broader dialogue that tackles historical grievances, mutual mistrust, and the socio-political challenges faced by the Algerian diaspora. Until then, the relationship between the two nations is likely to remain fraught, with social media serving as both a mirror and a magnifier of their discord.
Commentary
China’s Space Grab in Africa: How Beijing Is Winning the Final Frontier as Trump Slashes U.S. Aid

While Trump retreats, China plants its flag in Africa’s skies—building satellites, telescopes, and alliances to dominate space and surveillance.
As Trump guts foreign aid, China ramps up space partnerships across Africa, embedding surveillance tech and satellites that could shift the balance in the global space race—and military power.
Space for Sale: How China Is Colonizing Africa’s Skies as America Pulls Back
While the United States under President Trump slashes development aid and scales down soft power, China is quietly launching a space takeover in Africa—one satellite, telescope, and military-grade surveillance system at a time.
From a space lab outside Cairo to high-powered telescopes tracking orbital objects from Egyptian hilltops, China is embedding itself deep into Africa’s burgeoning space infrastructure. Beneath the banner of cooperation and development, Beijing is not just gifting technology—it’s harvesting data, expanding its global surveillance network, and establishing a strategic military and political footprint across the continent.
This is no secret to Washington. Intelligence veterans like Nicholas Eftimiades warn that China is “democratizing space to enhance its authoritarian capabilities”—a global dragnet cloaked in diplomacy. And it’s working. More than 23 African nations now partner with China on space ventures, from satellite launches and ground stations to a proposed joint moon base that openly rivals NASA’s Artemis program.
The Space City outside Cairo, where Chinese engineers outnumber locals, is emblematic. The “African-built” satellites launched there? Mostly assembled in China. Data ownership? Officially Egyptian—but insiders say Beijing still taps into the stream. It’s not just soft power—it’s hardware dominance with military consequences, including anti-satellite warfare readiness and real-time surveillance of joint U.S.-Egyptian exercises.
As China builds eyes in the sky, Trump’s America is going dark—cutting U.S. Agency for International Development funds and retreating from space diplomacy. Meanwhile, SpaceX’s Elon Musk races ahead in military-grade satellite networks, but there’s little sign of the U.S. competing with China’s ground-level infiltration across Africa.
The result? A Cold War-style showdown in orbit, with Africa as the battlefield—and Trump’s retreat from development aid and soft power may have handed Beijing the launch codes for a new global order in space.
China isn’t just investing in Africa—it’s outsourcing its space program onto the continent, collecting data, projecting power, and rewriting the rules of 21st-century dominance. The moon may be next, but the race is already raging here on Earth. And right now, Beijing is winning.
Commentary
Djibouti: New Foreign Minister Appointed as Nation Rises on African Stage

President Guelleh’s strategic vision propels Djibouti’s global influence as Abdoulkader Houssein Omar takes the reins of foreign affairs.
Djibouti appoints Abdoulkader Houssein Omar as new foreign minister after Mahamoud Ali Youssouf’s historic election to the AU Commission. A diplomatic reshuffle signaling a new era in African leadership.
Djibouti’s Strategic Rise: New Foreign Minister, Same Master Plan
Djibouti just played another winning move on the grand chessboard of African diplomacy.
Following Mahamoud Ali Youssouf’s landmark election as chair of the African Union Commission, President Ismail Omar Guelleh swiftly appointed Abdoulkader Houssein Omar—former ambassador to Kuwait and Jordan—as the new Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation.

Kuwait FM receives Ambassador Abdoulkader Houssein Omar
Far from a routine reshuffle, this singular change is the continuation of a meticulously orchestrated strategy that’s propelling Djibouti from a coastal enclave to a continental powerhouse.

Ambassador Abdoulkader Houssein Omar presents his credentials to King Abdullah II
The elevation of Youssouf to lead the AU is no fluke. It was the result of deliberate diplomacy crafted in the heart of Djibouti’s presidential palace. Guelleh, long respected for his calm resolve and regional alliances—especially within the Francophone bloc—has once again demonstrated that Djibouti may be small, but it is no lightweight.
Abdoulkader steps into a foreign ministry reshaped by Youssouf’s two-decade legacy. His immediate challenge? Leverage Djibouti’s commanding location on the Red Sea to expand its influence even further across Africa, the Arab League, and the geopolitical triangle anchored by the U.S., China, and France—all of which maintain military bases on Djibouti soil.
“We are not talking about a ministerial reshuffle,” clarified presidential spokesman Alexis Mohamed. “This is the only change within the government.” But that lone shift signals far more than meets the eye.
Djibouti stands as a rare bastion of stability in a region marred by conflict—from Yemen’s firestorms across the sea to the fragile Horn of Africa inland. And now, with one hand steering the AU and another guiding foreign affairs, Djibouti is quietly crafting a model for what African diplomacy could become: coordinated, strategic, and unapologetically assertive.
The world should pay attention. The next chapter in African diplomacy may be written in Djibouti City.
From Vision to Victory: Djibouti’s Political Mastery as Youssouf Assumes AU Chair
Djibouti’s Mahamoud Secures Historic AU Commission Chairmanship
Why Djibouti’s Mahamoud Ali Youssouf Will Win the AU Chairmanship
Commentary
Trump’s National Security Team Caught Using Personal Emails for Military Ops

Top Trump officials reportedly used unsecured Gmail accounts and Signal to coordinate US military strikes, sparking national security outcry.
In a scandal that could dwarf Hillary Clinton’s infamous email saga, members of Donald Trump’s national security team—including his top adviser Mike Waltz—have reportedly used personal Gmail accounts to discuss sensitive military operations and national security matters, according to the Washington Post.
The revelation comes hot on the heels of the so-called “Signal-Gate”, when a journalist was accidentally added to a Signal group chat where senior White House officials—including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Vice President J.D. Vance—were actively discussing real-time plans for US airstrikes in Yemen.
Now it gets worse.
The Post alleges that a senior aide to Waltz engaged in “highly technical conversations” via Gmail, including information on weapons systems and battlefield movements—content that experts warn could be “potentially exploitable” if intercepted.
This isn’t a minor protocol breach. It’s a massive operational security risk, and it flies in the face of government regulations that strictly require secure, government-issued communication platforms for such matters.
Waltz, now under fire, claims that he “didn’t and wouldn’t send classified information” through these accounts—but evidence suggests otherwise. His team allegedly coordinated meetings and posted fragments of his classified schedule into Signal messages, raising serious concerns among cybersecurity experts and Democrats alike.
The NSC attempted to downplay the leak, stating that Waltz copied messages to his government email “to ensure compliance,” while refusing to acknowledge whether sensitive intel was shared outside secure systems.
But that’s not washing with critics.
“The hypocrisy is staggering,” one Hill staffer told the media. “They spent years attacking Hillary over emails—and now Trump’s war council is texting about drone strikes like it’s a football group chat.”
Despite growing pressure, Trump is standing by his embattled team. “I don’t fire people because of fake news and because of witch hunts,” he said defiantly to NBC News.
But make no mistake: this is not just about emails. It’s about the chain of command being compromised, unauthorized communication during active military campaigns, and the alarming normalization of recklessness in U.S. national security.
And in an era of rising global tensions and cyber espionage, that’s not just dangerous—it’s damning.
Commentary
AUSSOM Exposes the Global Power Struggle Driving Somalia’s Next Conflict

The African Union’s new peace mission in Somalia—AUSSOM—faces early collapse from financing woes, geopolitical rivalries, and internal Somali divisions. Without unified support, another war-torn era may be inevitable.
As the African Union launches AUSSOM in Somalia, funding delays, fractured alliances, and donor fatigue threaten peace in a nation on the brink of renewed conflict.
The African Union’s latest intervention in Somalia, the African Union Support and Stabilization Mission in Somalia (AUSSOM), was meant to be a beacon of hope. Instead, it risks becoming the graveyard of yet another multilateral peace effort in a country that has bled through every alphabet soup of international missions: UNOSOM, AMISOM, ATMIS—and now AUSSOM.
This isn’t just about peacekeeping. AUSSOM is a geopolitical tug-of-war, with Somalia as the unwilling prize.
Despite being greenlit by the UN Security Council in January 2025, AUSSOM’s launch has already been kneecapped by financial chaos. The US—under its new Trump-era administration—has slammed the brakes on predictable UN financing, undermining Resolution 2719 and pushing for transitional mechanisms. Meanwhile, the EU, long the financial engine of African peace missions, is showing signs of donor fatigue, wary of throwing billions into what increasingly looks like a strategic black hole.
And while Western donors hesitate, regional powers like Turkey and Egypt are moving in aggressively—not to stabilize Somalia, but to carve it up into zones of influence. Each supports different militias and trains rival security units. Somalia, which should be focused on constitutional reform and integrating security forces, is now juggling a dozen foreign agendas and arming for the next round of internal warfare.
The Somali government’s own dysfunction only deepens the mess. From the federal feud with Puntland and Jubaland to the rising tensions with Somaliland, the country is imploding under the weight of conflicting visions and external meddling. Arrest warrants, firefights, and disputed elections define Somalia’s 2024-2025 political calendar. And into this minefield, AUSSOM has walked—underfunded, divided, and running out of time.
Without serious, coordinated multilateral support—especially financial—the AU mission could implode, leaving Somalia wide open to warlords, terrorists, and proxy powers. Gulf states and Turkey may hold the purse strings now, but the only thing they’re buying is fragmentation.
Qatar’s upcoming donor conference in April could be the last lifeline. But if the international community fails to unite around AUSSOM, Somalia may not survive another shattered peace mission. What comes next won’t be another transition—it will be a collapse.
Commentary
The Battle for Khartoum: Tracking Sudan’s War Over Two Years

As Sudan marks two years of brutal civil war, foreign powers fuel the bloodshed while peace talks stall and civilians suffer in silence.
Two years into Sudan’s devastating civil war, the death toll mounts, millions are displaced, and outside powers pour in weapons. With no peace in sight, this forgotten conflict risks exploding across the Horn of Africa.
It began on April 15, 2023 — a power struggle between two armed men that has now devolved into one of the deadliest and most neglected wars on earth. But Sudan’s war is no longer about two generals. It’s about a nation on fire, a people abandoned, and a global community complicit in silence.
Khartoum, once the beating heart of Sudan, has become a battleground of smoke, starvation, and shattered lives. In just two years, the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) have turned the country into a graveyard. Over 60,000 are believed dead. Over 14 million have fled their homes. More than 30 million are in urgent need of aid. And yet, the world shrugs.
Sudan’s War Is Not a Crisis — It’s a Catastrophe Ignored
What makes Sudan’s descent so uniquely tragic is the cynical choreography behind it. This isn’t just a civil war — it’s a proxy war. Foreign governments have chosen their warlords and are feeding them weapons: Saudi Arabia backing SAF’s al-Burhan, the UAE reportedly arming the RSF’s Hemedti through Chad. Egypt, Libya, Iran, and Russia each have stakes in the chaos. Sudan isn’t just bleeding — it’s being bled for influence.
Even worse, Sudan has become the battlefield for Middle East rivalries playing out thousands of miles away. The power vacuum left by Omar al-Bashir’s fall in 2019 became fertile ground for regional kingmakers and shadow donors. Civilians now pay the price for alliances they never asked for and battles they never started.
Meanwhile, peace talks are little more than political theatre. Jeddah, Switzerland, Addis — all have hosted failed negotiations, stifled by foreign interests and lack of neutrality. The UN left in 2024. There is no peacekeeping force, no humanitarian corridors, no international protection. Calls for “green zones” have gone unanswered. Children are dying in bombed-out hospitals. Entire towns are wiped off the map. Aid workers are targeted. And the African Union stands paralyzed.
The Sudanese war isn’t just a human tragedy. It’s a geopolitical warning shot. As the RSF creeps westward and SAF targets airports in Chad, the risk of regional spillover grows dangerously real. Eritrea, Ethiopia, South Sudan — all sit on the edge of a firestorm.
Sudan is the canary in the coal mine of Africa’s security. And right now, the canary is dying.
The world may be watching Gaza, Ukraine, and the Red Sea — but in Sudan, a slow-motion genocide is unfolding in the dark. If nothing changes, it won’t be long before Sudan’s war becomes the Horn of Africa’s collapse.
The time to act was yesterday. The price of inaction will be catastrophic tomorrow.
Study Reveals Sudan’s Civil War Death Toll Far Higher Than Previously Reported
Sudan’s Man-Made Famine: A Humanitarian Crisis in a Conflict-Ravaged Nation
Sexual Violence Used as Weapon of War Throughout Conflict in Sudan
Ethnic Cleansing Unleashed in Darfur: Sudanese Paramilitary Forces Accused of Horrific Atrocities
Sudan’s Military Repels Assault by Paramilitary Forces in el-Fasher
What’s Sudan like after 15 months of war, displacement, and inhumanity?
At Least 85 Killed in Sudan Village Attack by Paramilitary Forces
Sudan’s Al-Burhan Rejects Peace Talks, Promises to Fight for a Century
Human Rights Watch Accuses Sudan’s RSF of War Crimes in South Kordofan
Understanding the Urgency: Why the World Must Pay Closer Attention to Sudan
Sudan’s Power Shift: Army Captures Presidential Palace Amidst National Crisis
A Deep Dive into the Roots of Sudan’s Civil War and Its Impact on Regional Stability
How Militia Groups Capture States and Ruin Countries: The Case of Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces
Nile Waters Divide Widens as Egypt and Sudan Reject New Basin Agreement
World Bank Cuts 2024 Growth Forecast for sub-Saharan Africa Over Sudan
Sudan Punishes Kenya for Hosting RSF Group by Suspending all Imports
Sudan: U.S. Withdraws Nonessential Staff Amid Escalating Tensions
Sudanese Opposition Leader Detained in Kenya on Interpol Warrant
How a Key Ingredient in Coca-Cola, M&M’s is Smuggled From War-torn Sudan
Sudanese Warlords Likely To Be No-Shows at Geneva Peace Talks
Commentary
Egypt’s Military Buildup Tests Limits of Peace Deal with Israel

Israeli Officials Warn of “Intolerable” Egyptian Violations as Cairo Expands Forces, Ports, and Airfields in Defiance of Camp David Accords.
Tensions rise as Egypt quietly escalates military presence in Sinai. Israeli security officials warn that Cairo’s moves violate the peace agreement—calling on the U.S. to intervene before it’s too late.
Egypt is expanding its military footprint in the Sinai Peninsula, pushing beyond the force limits established in the 1979 Camp David peace accords. And while tanks can retreat, trust doesn’t reverse as easily.
According to a high-level Israeli security source, Egypt has quietly deployed forces in excess of the permitted quota, constructed new port facilities, and extended runways at key airbases—turning Sinai into a potential launchpad rather than a demilitarized buffer.
The implications? Explosive.
For decades, the Israeli-Egyptian peace deal—backed by billions in U.S. military aid—stood as a rare pillar of stability in the region. Now, that fragile architecture is under strain. “Israel will not accept the situation and will not tolerate violations from Cairo,” the security source told reporters, bluntly.
Let’s be clear: this is not just about tanks or jets—it’s about intent. Cairo’s incremental militarization of Sinai looks more strategic than reactive. Is Egypt posturing for regional leverage? Or is it laying groundwork for a future showdown, possibly against Israel or to support proxy operations in Gaza?
What’s worse is Washington’s relative silence. As the broker and guarantor of the Camp David agreement, the U.S. is legally and diplomatically obligated to enforce the terms. Yet as Egypt redraws the lines in the sand, American influence appears paralyzed.
Back in February, Israel’s Ambassador to the U.S., Yechiel Leiter, called Cairo’s buildup “intolerable” and warned that Jerusalem would soon raise the issue “very firmly.” Now, with Egypt doubling down, the question is whether Israel will act—diplomatically or otherwise.
This isn’t a drill. When peace agreements become optional, war becomes inevitable. If the U.S. fails to hold Egypt accountable, Israel may be forced to consider options no one wants on the table.
Sinai is no longer quiet. And the peace is no longer guaranteed.
Commentary
US AFRICOM Strikes ISIS Strongholds in Somalia

US Africa Command (AFRICOM) has executed targeted strikes against ISIS positions in Somalia’s Puntland region, southeast of Bosaso. Conducted in coordination with Somalia’s government, this operation highlights the escalating threat ISIS poses to American forces and broader regional stability.
The March 29 strikes, as detailed in AFRICOM’s official statement, targeted militant positions deemed threatening to US military personnel and interests in the strategically critical Horn of Africa. While the US provided limited operational details, the timing and location underscore significant geopolitical maneuvers unfolding in the region.
Notably, these airstrikes occur just one day after a controversial diplomatic offer from Somalia’s President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud to President Donald Trump was leaked. Mohamud proposed granting the US “exclusive operational control” over strategic assets—including Bosaso port and airbase and Somaliland’s Berbera port—in a desperate bid to bolster US involvement and counteract regional instability.
However, this diplomatic overture sparked immediate controversy, especially since these assets remain outside Mogadishu’s control. The recent US military actions, striking precisely near these contested sites, signify a robust American posture in response to ISIS threats while simultaneously underscoring the complex interplay between US strategic interests and Somalia’s fragile sovereignty.
Washington’s strikes and Somalia’s provocative diplomatic offers reveal the growing urgency in controlling critical Horn of Africa maritime routes against terrorist threats and international rivals.
Will intensified US military actions stabilize Somalia, or could they further inflame regional tensions, reshaping the strategic balance in this geopolitically sensitive corridor?
Commentary
Massive Protests Shake Istanbul After Arrest of Popular Mayor Imamoglu: Turkiye’s Democracy in Crisis

Hundreds of thousands of furious protesters poured into the streets of Istanbul on Saturday, escalating a wave of demonstrations triggered by the arrest and imprisonment of the city’s charismatic former mayor, Ekrem Imamoglu. The dramatic protests, among the largest seen in Turkiye in recent years, underline growing tensions over the state of democracy and judicial independence under President Recep Tayyip Erdogan.
Imamoglu, considered Erdogan’s most formidable political rival, was arrested on corruption charges on March 23 after initial accusations of terrorism were dismissed by the courts. His imprisonment sparked immediate nationwide outrage, with protesters branding his arrest as politically motivated.
In a powerful message read aloud during the massive rally, Imamoglu declared defiantly: “I have no fear because the nation is united against the oppressor. They can jail me, they can put me on trial, but the people will crush their plots.”
The government continues to deny claims of political manipulation, insisting the judiciary remains independent. Erdogan has fiercely condemned the protests, branding demonstrators as threats to national stability. “Those who spread terror have nowhere to go,” Erdogan warned, calling the demonstrations a “dead end.”
Protesters passionately disagree, with many voicing fears about the erosion of freedoms and the future of democracy. One demonstrator told reporters, “I’m 25 and I’ve only ever known one government—I want change.” Another stated bluntly, “The judiciary is not independent.”
Ozgur Ozel, leader of the opposition Republican People’s Party (CHP), criticized the aggressive police response that has seen nearly 1,900 people detained since Imamoglu’s arrest. “They’ve detained hundreds, arrested thousands—trying to intimidate and terrify us into silence.”
Despite severe crackdowns, the scale of these protests sends a strong message: many Turks are unwilling to accept the suppression of political rivals and the erosion of their democratic rights.
Turkiye stands at a crossroads, facing a crucial test of its democratic resilience.
-
Analysis3 weeks ago
Saudi Arabia’s Billion-Dollar Bid for Eritrea’s Assab Port
-
ASSESSMENTS3 days ago
Operation Geel Exposes the Truth: International Community’s Reluctance to Embrace Somaliland as a Strategic Ally
-
Somaliland2 months ago
Somaliland and UAE Elevate Ties to Comprehensive Strategic Partnership
-
Africa12 months ago
How Somaliland Could Lead the Global Camel Milk Industry
-
Analysis12 months ago
Iran escalates conflict, attacking Israel; US forces help Israel to intercept Iranian projectiles
-
Top stories10 months ago
Gunmen Kill 11 in Southeastern Nigeria Attack, Army Reports
-
Analysis12 months ago
Israel and Iran on Edge: Tensions Escalate Amidst Rising Threats
-
TECH10 months ago
Zimbabwe Approves Licensing of Musk’s Starlink Internet Service