As Beijing escalates military activities, Taipei seeks clarity on U.S. policy under Trump while bolstering defenses against mounting threats.

Taiwan finds itself at a critical juncture as U.S. President-elect Donald Trump prepares to return to the White House. Amid Beijing’s increasing military aggression and gray zone tactics, Taipei faces uncertainty about how Trump’s administration will handle U.S.-Taiwan relations, a cornerstone of stability in the region.

Donald Trump’s rhetoric on Taiwan during his campaign offered mixed signals, leaving policymakers in Taipei cautiously optimistic but concerned. While Trump praised Taiwan’s economic prowess, he controversially suggested that the island “pay for defense” and emphasized prioritizing U.S. interests. His pledge to impose heavy tariffs on China if it “goes into Taiwan” reflects a transactional approach to U.S.-Taiwan relations.

Trump’s return comes as Taiwan grows accustomed to more explicit support under Joe Biden, who repeatedly affirmed the U.S. commitment to defend Taiwan in the event of a Chinese invasion. Trump’s vague post-election remarks about his “good relationship” with Chinese President Xi Jinping add to Taipei’s unease.

In recent weeks, Taiwan has ramped up diplomatic efforts with U.S. officials and Trump’s transition team to secure continuity in relations. President Lai Ching-te’s outreach to Republican congressional leaders and stopovers in Hawaii and Guam signal proactive engagement to build bipartisan support for Taiwan in Washington.

On the home front, Taiwan is strengthening its defenses against Beijing’s escalating military pressure. The island’s defense budget is set to reach a record $19.74 billion in 2025, funding initiatives like real-combat drills and a civil defense committee to counter China’s gray zone tactics.

Beijing has intensified its military pressure campaign on Taiwan, conducting two blockade-style exercises in 2024 and deploying the largest number of naval and coast guard vessels near Taiwan in decades. Gray zone operations, such as sending oversized coast guard ships to intimidate Taiwan’s outlying Kinmen and Matsu islands, complicate Taipei’s defense strategy.

These tactics aim to exhaust Taiwan’s resources and test its response capabilities while avoiding direct conflict. China’s Foreign Ministry has reiterated its resolve to “safeguard sovereignty and territorial integrity,” signaling that Beijing’s pressure will persist regardless of Trump’s policies.

Taiwan’s future hinges on its ability to navigate the dual challenges of managing ties with the U.S. under Trump’s unpredictable leadership and countering Beijing’s aggression. While bipartisan support in Congress provides some reassurance, Trump’s transactional approach to foreign policy could introduce uncertainties.

Taipei’s bolstered defense measures and diplomatic efforts reflect a pragmatic approach to mitigating risks. However, as China assesses Trump’s stance, its actions may escalate further, necessitating careful coordination between Taiwan and its international allies to preserve stability in the Indo-Pacific.

Taiwan stands at a pivotal moment as it balances rising threats from China with the uncertainties of U.S. policy under Trump. While proactive measures strengthen its defense and diplomatic ties, the island must remain vigilant and adaptive to maintain its security and sovereignty in an increasingly volatile region.

Moscow cautions Trump administration over possible resumption of nuclear tests, signaling heightened risks to global stability.

As arms control agreements between global powers erode, Russia has issued a stark warning to the United States about the potential resumption of nuclear testing under Donald Trump’s upcoming administration. Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov, Moscow’s lead on arms control, cautioned that such a move could usher in a perilous new chapter in nuclear weapons development, nearly eight decades after the first nuclear bomb test.

Resurgence of Nuclear Testing?

Ryabkov’s remarks reflect growing tensions between the U.S. and Russia, with both nations modernizing their nuclear arsenals amid the collapse of Cold War-era treaties. Trump’s previous stance on the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) — which the U.S. has signed but not ratified — suggests a potential pivot toward renewed testing, a step that would mark a significant departure from global norms.

“The international situation is extremely difficult at the moment,” Ryabkov told Kommersant newspaper, emphasizing that U.S. policies are perceived as “extremely hostile.” Russia’s warning underscores its readiness to respond in kind, should the U.S. resume testing.

The resumption of nuclear testing by the U.S. or Russia could destabilize decades of arms control efforts. Such actions would not only intensify the arms race but could also embolden other nuclear powers like China to follow suit, further destabilizing global security.

With Russia, the U.S., and China already engaged in significant upgrades to their nuclear capabilities, renewed testing could exacerbate tensions and undermine fragile agreements aimed at preventing nuclear proliferation.

The Crumbling Arms Control Framework

The decline of Cold War-era treaties has left the global arms control framework in tatters:

The INF Treaty, which eliminated intermediate-range missiles, dissolved in 2019.

The New START Treaty, limiting strategic nuclear arsenals, faces an uncertain future as its 2026 expiration approaches.

Trump’s potential return to office could signal a further unraveling of these agreements, with a more unilateral approach to U.S. nuclear policy likely to provoke adversaries.

China’s rapid modernization of its nuclear arsenal complicates the global arms control landscape. While Beijing remains a far smaller nuclear power than the U.S. or Russia, its refusal to participate in multilateral arms control discussions adds another layer of uncertainty to an already volatile situation.

Ryabkov’s warning highlights the precarious state of global arms control as geopolitical tensions rise. A resumption of nuclear testing by the U.S. or Russia would represent a dangerous escalation, with implications far beyond bilateral relations.

As Trump’s administration considers its next steps, the world faces the prospect of a destabilized nuclear order, with heightened risks of proliferation, regional conflicts, and an accelerated arms race. The decisions made in Washington and Moscow in the coming months will determine whether the world moves closer to renewed nuclear brinkmanship or toward a renewed commitment to arms control.

IDF targets Houthi-controlled sites in Sanaa, Hodeidah, and other locations in its most extensive operation, with U.S. intelligence backing.

In its most expansive operation yet in Yemen, Israel’s Air Force carried out a series of precision airstrikes targeting Houthi-controlled infrastructure in Sanaa, Hodeidah, and surrounding areas. The strikes come amid rising tensions following multiple Houthi ballistic missile launches that recently targeted central Israel, intensifying the regional conflict.

The Operation: Scope and Impact

The operation involved 25 Israeli aircraft, including fighter jets, reconnaissance planes, and tankers. Key targets included:

Sanaa International Airport: Control towers, landing aids, and runways were destroyed to disrupt Iranian supply chains. Civilian aircraft used by Houthi leaders were also damaged.

Hodeidah Port: Strikes targeted oil facilities and critical infrastructure, likely to hinder the Houthis’ logistical capabilities.

Power Stations: The Haziz power station, critical to the Sanaa region, was severely damaged.

These strikes highlight Israel’s strategic intent to degrade the Houthis’ operational capacity and disrupt Iran’s influence in the region.

Israeli Leadership’s Message

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Defense Minister Israel Katz, and top military officials observed the operation from the Air Force command center. Katz declared, “No Houthi leader will escape Israel’s reach,” emphasizing Israel’s resolve to counter threats. IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Herzi Halevi added, “Our long-range strike capabilities ensure precision and power against any threat to Israel’s citizens.”

Casualties and Global Repercussions

Houthi-affiliated media reported three deaths and 16 injuries from the strikes. Notably, World Health Organization Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus was at Sanaa Airport during the attack. Ghebreyesus described the damage and confirmed injuries among his team.

While some criticized the strikes for affecting civilian infrastructure, Israeli officials defended the action as necessary. “If the Houthis don’t understand force, they’ll understand more force,” one senior official said, hinting at potential escalations.

U.S.-Israel Coordination

The operation underscores deepening U.S.-Israel military collaboration. Intelligence sharing played a pivotal role, with sources dubbing the strike a “Hanu-Christmas collaboration.” This coordination aligns with shared goals of curbing Iran’s influence and addressing the Houthi threat.

Context and Strategic Implications

The airstrikes follow a series of Houthi missile attacks on Israel, which caused damage in Tel Aviv and surrounding areas. The IDF’s decisive response demonstrates Israel’s capability to project power far beyond its borders, targeting Iranian-backed groups in the region.

Israel’s actions also send a message to Tehran: its proxy forces will face direct consequences. The strikes highlight Israel’s broader strategy of targeting Iranian supply lines and diminishing the operational capabilities of Tehran’s allies, including the Houthis.

Conclusion

Israel’s largest airstrike in Yemen marks a significant escalation in its campaign to counter Iran’s regional influence. The coordinated operation with U.S. intelligence underscores a united front against the growing threat posed by Houthi missile attacks and Iranian-backed forces.

As tensions rise, this operation signals Israel’s readiness to take decisive action while strengthening its strategic partnerships. The message is clear: any threat to Israel’s security will be met with unparalleled force.

Regional tensions and Houthi attacks in the Red Sea cause an $8 billion revenue loss for Egypt, compounding economic challenges.

Egypt’s economy faces mounting pressure as geopolitical instability in the Middle East continues to weigh on one of its most critical revenue sources—the Suez Canal. Pro-Iranian Houthi militias have launched repeated attacks on merchant vessels in the Red Sea, deterring maritime traffic and prompting some shippers to reroute via the Cape of Good Hope. This shift has caused Egypt to lose $8 billion in canal revenue over the past year, a substantial blow to its GDP.

The reduction in Suez Canal transits has had ripple effects across Egypt’s economy. Fitch Solutions recently revised Egypt’s GDP growth forecast for the 2024/2025 fiscal year down to 3.7%, citing disruptions to canal traffic and subdued economic performance in the previous fiscal year. While Fitch anticipates a rebound in non-oil exports and investments, the projected recovery remains slower than initially expected.

Similarly, the IMF’s latest review of Egypt’s Extended Fund Facility program highlights the canal revenue drop as a significant obstacle to economic stabilization. Regional instability, compounded by the rising number of refugees, has strained public services and amplified fiscal pressures, particularly in health and education.

Amid these challenges, Egypt is turning to privatization as a potential remedy for its economic stagnation. Prime Minister Mustafa Madbouly recently announced plans to list three to four military-owned companies, including Wataniya and Safi, on the stock exchange. Wataniya operates a network of gas stations, while Safi focuses on bottled water, olive oil, and related products.

This privatization initiative is part of a broader economic reform plan tied to Egypt’s agreement with the IMF. By reducing military dominance in the economy and encouraging private sector growth, the government hopes to unlock economic potential, create jobs, and stabilize macroeconomic conditions.

Egypt has seen some relief on the inflation front, with urban consumer price inflation falling to 25.5% in November, down from a peak of 38% in September 2023. However, inflation remains elevated, driven by external shocks such as the Russia-Ukraine war and domestic factors, including the Suez Canal revenue decline.

The Central Bank of Egypt has implemented measures to stabilize the exchange rate and tighten monetary policy to curb inflation. While these reforms have slowed inflationary pressures, continued vigilance is necessary to sustain progress.

The Suez Canal is not only an economic lifeline but also a geopolitical asset. The ongoing instability in the Red Sea underscores the vulnerability of this critical waterway to regional conflicts. Egypt’s ability to safeguard the canal and restore confidence in its security will be pivotal in reversing the economic damage caused by declining transits.

Egypt’s economic recovery remains fragile, with falling Suez Canal revenues adding to a litany of challenges, including inflation and fiscal pressures. While privatization and economic reforms offer hope, the success of these initiatives will depend on Egypt’s ability to navigate geopolitical uncertainties and implement sustainable policies.

The canal’s significance extends beyond Egypt’s borders, making regional stability a priority not just for Cairo but for the global economy as well. As Egypt works to stabilize its finances, its resilience in the face of these challenges will determine its ability to reclaim economic momentum.

Tokyo balances cautious dialogue with Beijing while reaffirming its strategic alliance with the U.S. amid heightened regional tensions.

As the global stage braces for the return of Donald Trump to the White House, Japan and China are recalibrating their bilateral relationship in a climate of uncertainty. While both nations have expressed interest in improving ties, longstanding disputes and regional security challenges underscore the difficulty of achieving any meaningful reset.

Japanese Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya’s recent meetings with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi and Premier Li Qiang in Beijing highlighted both nations’ cautious attempts to foster dialogue. Japan emphasized concerns over Chinese military activities in the East China Sea and the safety of Japanese citizens in China, while Beijing sought to promote people-to-people exchanges and economic cooperation.

China’s Wang Yi urged Tokyo to “calibrate its strategic perception” and pursue a “positive policy toward China,” yet such rhetoric is unlikely to assuage Japan’s concerns over issues like the Senkaku Islands and Beijing’s aggressive posturing in the Indo-Pacific. The two nations agreed to hold high-level economic and security dialogues, signaling a willingness to maintain communication despite tensions.

Japan’s motivations are deeply intertwined with its strategic alignment with the United States. With Trump’s anticipated hardline approach toward China, Tokyo views this transitional period as an opportunity to extract concessions from Beijing while preparing for intensified U.S.-China competition.

Stephen Nagy, a Tokyo-based political analyst, notes that Japan seeks “short-term gains” from China, such as enhanced economic exchanges and reduced tensions, without compromising its strategic priorities. Simultaneously, Japan aims to influence U.S. policy, ensuring Washington adopts a nuanced approach to its rivalry with Beijing.

Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba underscored the importance of the U.S.-Japan alliance during a recent press conference, reaffirming that Tokyo’s ultimate priority remains strengthening ties with Washington.

Disputes over Japan’s discharge of treated radioactive wastewater from the Fukushima nuclear plant have further strained relations. Despite efforts to allow independent testing by stakeholders, Beijing continues its seafood import ban, leveraging the issue to pressure Tokyo diplomatically.

While China’s economic incentives historically aimed to create rifts between Japan and the U.S., analysts like Nagy argue that Beijing’s declining economy limits its ability to achieve sustainable influence over Tokyo.

Japan’s approach to China reflects a delicate balancing act: maintaining essential economic and regional ties while safeguarding its strategic partnership with the United States. Tokyo’s strategy of leveraging the current geopolitical climate to secure concessions from Beijing demonstrates pragmatism, but the enduring security challenges posed by China’s military ambitions remain significant obstacles to a genuine rapprochement.

As Trump’s return to the White House looms, Japan’s focus will likely shift to managing U.S.-China competition, advocating for a balanced approach that protects its interests without further destabilizing the Indo-Pacific region. Whether Tokyo can successfully navigate this intricate geopolitical landscape remains to be seen.

How Somaliland’s strategic position is attracting Israeli and Emirati interest amid rising regional tensions and global power plays.

Somaliland’s geostrategic significance has placed it at the heart of a complex web of international interests, particularly as Israel and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) seek to bolster their presence in the Gulf of Aden. With the region serving as a critical corridor for approximately 12% of global trade, the pro-independence territory’s proximity to Yemen and the Strait of Bab el-Mandeb makes it a prime candidate for military and economic initiatives aimed at curbing threats from the pro-Iranian Houthi militias.

Israel and UAE’s Strategic Interests

Recent reports reveal a burgeoning partnership between Israel, the UAE, and Somaliland to establish a military base in the port city of Berbera. The facility would allow Israel to launch preemptive strikes against Houthi targets and deter future attacks, while also enhancing surveillance capabilities in the Red Sea. Facilitated by Abu Dhabi, this collaboration underscores the UAE’s ambition to dominate strategic sea lanes, a goal it has pursued through substantial investments, including a $440 million project to develop Berbera’s port and airport infrastructure.

The UAE’s involvement extends beyond Somaliland to Yemen’s Socotra archipelago, where a joint Israeli-Emirati military and intelligence facility already operates. Somaliland’s potential role as a Red Sea security hub aligns seamlessly with these broader objectives, further cementing the region’s importance in countering Houthi and Iranian influence.

The U.S. Factor

Somaliland’s rising profile is also drawing attention from the United States, particularly among Republicans aligned with former President Donald Trump. Influential figures and think tanks, including the Heritage Foundation, are advocating for Somaliland’s recognition as an independent state. They view Somaliland as a stable and reliable partner in a region where Chinese and Russian influence is expanding.

A U.S. recognition of Somaliland could serve multiple strategic purposes:

Countering China: With Beijing maintaining a military base in nearby Djibouti, recognition of Somaliland would provide the U.S. with a foothold to monitor Chinese activities in the Horn of Africa.

Tackling Houthi Militias: The establishment of a U.S.-aligned base in Somaliland would strengthen efforts to neutralize threats from Yemen.

Monitoring Weapons Movement: Somaliland could become a key node for U.S. intelligence operations in the volatile Gulf of Aden.

While Israel and the UAE see Somaliland as a linchpin in their strategic calculus, the potential establishment of a military base in Berbera could heighten tensions in the already volatile Red Sea region. Egypt, which views any foreign military presence near the Suez Canal as a threat, might oppose such a development.

Moreover, the interplay of global powers, including the U.S., China, and Russia, adds another layer of complexity. Somaliland’s pursuit of international recognition could either elevate its strategic standing or entangle it further in regional and global rivalries.

Conclusion

Somaliland’s strategic location is transforming it into a coveted asset for nations seeking to secure their interests in the Horn of Africa. While Israeli-Emirati initiatives highlight the region’s growing importance, the potential for U.S. recognition adds a new dimension to its geopolitical value. However, these developments also risk further destabilizing the region, making Somaliland a focal point in the global chessboard of power and influence.

The world’s next moves regarding Somaliland will not only shape the future of the region but also redefine alliances and rivalries in the broader Red Sea corridor.

Once allies with shared strategic goals, Pakistan and Afghanistan are now locked in escalating tensions marked by cross-border violence and growing mistrust. The latest incident—a deadly airstrike by Pakistan in Afghanistan’s Paktika province—has widened the rift, highlighting a complex relationship that has deteriorated since the Taliban seized power in 2021.

On December 24, Pakistan launched airstrikes on the Barmal district in Paktika province, killing civilians, including women and children. While Islamabad claimed the strikes targeted Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) militants, Kabul accused Pakistan of violating its sovereignty and vowed retaliation. Afghanistan’s Taliban-led government condemned the attack as a “barbaric” act and summoned Pakistan’s envoy to express its outrage.

This is not the first time such incidents have occurred. Earlier this year, similar airstrikes prompted retaliatory fire from Afghanistan, reflecting a pattern of increasing hostility.

Pakistan’s military actions stem from a pressing security concern: the rise of the TTP. With safe havens allegedly in Afghanistan, the TTP has launched numerous attacks on Pakistani soil, making 2023 one of the bloodiest years in recent memory. Islamabad accuses Kabul of harboring the TTP, a claim the Taliban denies. Yet, the persistence of cross-border attacks underscores the failure of both nations to address this volatile issue.

The TTP’s resurgence highlights the fragility of Pakistan’s internal security. Once seen as a patron of the Afghan Taliban, Islamabad now faces blowback as militant groups exploit Afghanistan’s unregulated spaces to destabilize Pakistan.

Pakistan’s mass deportation of Afghan refugees has further strained relations. Citing security and economic pressures, Islamabad expelled over half a million Afghans, a move Kabul described as inhumane. For decades, Pakistan hosted millions of Afghan refugees, but its recent hardline approach reflects shifting priorities and dwindling tolerance for Afghan migrants amid economic challenges.

Historically, Pakistan supported the Afghan Taliban to counter Soviet influence and maintain strategic depth. However, the Taliban’s 2021 return to power disrupted this dynamic. Feeling emboldened by new partnerships with China, Russia, and Iran, the Taliban no longer see Pakistan as indispensable. Meanwhile, Islamabad, grappling with its own challenges, has found its influence over Kabul diminishing.

The deteriorating relationship between these two nations has regional and global implications. Border skirmishes, deportations, and growing ties between the Taliban and other nations complicate Pakistan’s strategic calculations. Efforts to mend ties seem unlikely in the near term, as both nations pursue divergent goals.

Pakistan and Afghanistan now stand as adversaries, their historical camaraderie overshadowed by mutual suspicion and unyielding national interests. Whether this relationship can be salvaged depends on pragmatic diplomacy and mutual recognition of shared security challenges—a path that remains uncertain amid escalating hostilities.

The revelation that Somali Al-Shabaab operatives have infiltrated Yemen to support the Houthis represents a perilous new dimension in the region’s already volatile conflict. Intelligence reports indicate that dozens of Al-Shabaab fighters, affiliated with Al-Qaeda, have been smuggled into Hodeidah and Abyan provinces under the coordination of Houthi forces and local Al-Qaeda leaders. This alliance of convenience is poised to escalate Yemen’s conflict and pose a broader threat to regional stability.

The Houthi-Al-Shabaab Nexus

The collaboration between Al-Shabaab and the Houthis, despite their differing ideological frameworks, underscores the pragmatic alliances terrorist organizations often forge to achieve tactical goals. The Houthis, who have long relied on external support from Iran and allied militias, now appear to be diversifying their sources of manpower and operational capacity by integrating Al-Shabaab fighters into their strategy. These operatives are reportedly being prepared for both land-based assaults and naval operations, signaling a multifaceted threat that could destabilize shipping lanes in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden.

The Bigger Picture

This alarming development occurs amidst a backdrop of increasing challenges for the Houthis. As internal discontent grows within Houthi-controlled areas due to economic collapse, repression, and starvation, the group may be seeking to project strength through enhanced military operations. However, their reliance on external operatives such as Al-Shabaab reflects both desperation and a willingness to exploit regional terrorist networks to maintain their grip on power.

The partnership between the Houthis and Al-Shabaab represents a calculated yet dangerous escalation in Yemen’s conflict. If left unchecked, this alliance threatens to spill instability across borders, jeopardizing regional and global security. For the international community, this is a call to action to curb the influence of these extremist groups before their collaboration further entrenches chaos in one of the world’s most fragile regions.

Russia Arming Houthis: A New Threat to Somaliland’s Security and Global Internet

How the Houthis Are Shaking the Foundations of Global Order

Somaliland Sounds the Alarm: Rising Al-Shabaab-Houthi Alliance Threatens Regional Stability